#conflict analysis

Iran just rejected the ceasefire. Refused to reopen Hormuz. Said the US "lacks readiness" for peace.

Here is what that means for Trump. He has three options left. All three are catastrophic.

⚠️ OPTION 1: KEEP BOMBING

The US is running low on stealth missiles after 38 days of strikes. Iran keeps charging $2,000,000 per ship to cross Hormuz. Every week of bombing costs America more than Iran loses.

A French think tank already called this a "Triple Failure — military, economic, and political."

This option does not end the war. It funds Iran.

⚠️ OPTION 2: NEGOTIATE WITH NO LEVERAGE

Iran holds Hormuz. Iran holds the oil. Iran collects payments in Chinese yuan. Trump set 12 deadlines. Iran ignored every one.

Every deadline that passes makes the next one weaker. Negotiating now means negotiating from the losing position Trump swore would never happen.

⚠️ OPTION 3: ESCALATE TO FORCE HORMUZ OPEN

35 countries are already begging for this to stop. Oil already surged $11 in one day — the worst energy shock since the 1970s.

A full escalation risks turning a regional war into a global one. And Iran has already warned it will never return Hormuz "to its former state, especially for America."

Let that sink in.

Trump said "Iran has been essentially decimated" on week three.

Day 38: Iran charges ships $2,000,000 to pass through the water Trump said he would liberate.

There is no Option 4. There is no clean exit. The only entity making money right now is Iran.

There’s something unsettling about online war debates. They rarely begin with facts. They begin with a line that hits like a slap.Someone says hating a country should be treated like a mental disorder. That’s not an argument. It’s a verdict.And once a verdict is delivered, the rest is predictable. Applause from one side. Outrage from the other. Somewhere in between, a few people try to speak in…

There are places in the world where violence does not need religion. And then there are places where religion makes it sharper. Recent reports of attacks on Christian communities in parts of Africa—especially in Nigeria—have circulated widely. The language online is immediate and absolute: slaughter, persecution, genocide. Some of those claims oversimplify a complicated reality. The violence…

As of today—April 11, 2026—there was supposed to be a two-week ceasefire in the ongoing conflict involving the United States, Iran, and Israel. A pause. A chance to step back. A moment—however brief—to stop the escalation and create space for something resembling diplomacy. But instead, what we’re seeing already is something else entirely. Violations. Breakdowns. A ceasefire that, in…

Information warfare is the real battlefield. Not missiles. Not tanks. Not even territory. Instead, what we are witnessing is a quieter contest. A struggle over perception, narrative, and belief. And that shift changes everything. How Information Warfare Replaced Traditional Combat Modern conflict no longer begins with troops crossing borders. It begins with stories. For example, during the…

  Continue reading GÉOPOLITIQUE SIMPLE : COMPRENDRE UN CONFLIT SANS TOMBER DANS LA PROPAGANDE

Introduction: separating claims from reality West Papua separatist groups present a powerful narrative of inevitable independence, international injustice, and moral certainty. This narrative circulates widely through activist networks, social media campaigns, and sympathetic foreign audiences. Yet when examined carefully, many of the core claims do not withstand factual, legal, or geopolitical…