The Sound and the Fury modern AU where Caroline Bascomb is a transphobic mother who refuses to support Caddy after the fallout with Herbert because of his queerness
seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from China

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Israel

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Iraq
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Ecuador
seen from Sweden
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
The Sound and the Fury modern AU where Caroline Bascomb is a transphobic mother who refuses to support Caddy after the fallout with Herbert because of his queerness

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
flats of my beutiful wifeš¤¤š¤¤š¤¤š¤¤
Gay son AND thot daughter. But that is really the least concerning thing about your entire family (your third child is yelling slurs as we speak)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I'm sorry
Literature Circle #4 Reflection
In our final literature circle for William Faulknerās The Sound and the Fury, we discussed the ending of the book, and we all agreed that we were disappointed with the abrupt way that the story finished. We all felt that there was going to be a bigger climax, so we were all a little bit taken aback by the sudden,Ā āordinaryā ending. After going a bit deeper as to why Faulkner would have finished his novel in such a way, we realized that he was trying to show us that life doesnāt work as most books want us to think. Sometimes there is noĀ ābig eventā that changes, or resolves everything; life goes on no matter what. This is what the modern writers really wanted us to grasp; books like The Sound and the Fury give us only a snippet of the lives of the characters, and most of the time, the story line will be disappointing. We realized that Faulkner was trying to tell us that life is disappointing, and it canāt wait for people to come back, or for something drastic to happen. Another reason why the author might have not brought Caddy back in the end is because he wanted his readers to feel how the characters in the book felt, especially Benjy. We all agreed that we were so eagerly expecting her to come back and explain herself, but she never did, and this is how Benjy felt like his whole life after she left him. He is described waiting at the gate every day hoping that she would return, and we are able to see the agony he lives with every time he is reminded of her because he misses her dearly. Faulkner wanted to keep us waiting because that is what the characters were doing as well, and he wanted us to feel what they were feeling. This applies especially for Benjyās situation, but it also can apply for Jason, who Iām sure wanted Caddy to come back and apologize to him for what she did, and for Miss Quentin, who really wants to have a real relationship with her mother.Ā
I shared my idea about how Caddy might be the fire represented on the cover page of the novel, and the group agreed that this is a very plausible answer. We looked at the ways that she is a warm character (especially to Benjy), a very lively one (we see that in the way that she is daring and not afraid to take risks), but she is, in many ways, very destructive in the Compson family. We all thought that the fire would be something physical, that when the fire would actually appear in the story, things would start becoming very interesting, but we took little consideration to the possibility that maybe the fire is just a metaphor and that this fire was present throughout the whole novel. We were playing around with the idea that maybe Caddy is theĀ ātragedyā that is so clearly mentioned in the description on the back of the book. Figuring out what this tragedy was was kind of our mission throughout the whole time we were reading, but we realized that it isnāt as clear as we thought.Ā
We also all agreed that we loved Dilsey as a character because she is such a strong woman in a time where women, especially black women, were not highly esteemed.We appreciated Faulkner even more for creating this character; I donāt know how many people would have made a character like hers in the time period that they were in. We thought it was interesting to hear a black servantās voice because we so rarely do know exactly how they lived during this time period.Ā
Although we were disappointed with Caddyās not coming back we found it kind of neat that the last portion of the book was written in the third person, because it gave us an outside perspective on things. Throughout the whole novel, we were always experiencing the things going on in the story through somebody elseās mind, so we were limited in the sense that we could only go as far as the first-person narratorās opinion about everything. With a third-person narrative, we could look at things objectively, and see them for what they truly were, instead of having to rely on a characterās perception of things.Ā
We liked that Caddy remains a mystery to us, and that theĀ ātragedyā, the whole point of the story, is still so unclear to us, despite having finished the book. I personally think that is what makes the story so good; it makes me so much more in awe of her character. Although we donāt see her in the end, and this is super sad, we are left with an emptiness that only her coming back could fill, and this is what is kind of genius about the book. Faulkner built up this whole narrative, centered on her, only to leave us with an expectation that is never fulfilled in the end. William Faulkner, especially for the time this piece was written in, was a true genius because he went against what aĀ āgoodā book is supposed to be. Instead of a novel based on events, and the characters simply being instruments to facilitate the way these events resolve each other, The Sound and the Fury is based on a character, and the events of the novel are only instruments to facilitate the way we perceive her. With the book being so much about Caddy, we couldnāt help but feel struck by the fact that life does just go on, and people may live their life with their thoughts centered on someone, but it doesnāt mean that they will see them again. Most of the time, life just goes on, no matter how much youāre thinking about someone. This is the main thing that I personally got from reading this novel. Life goes on, no matter how much one may will it not to.
Caddy: A Mystery
Why did Faulkner decide to write the final chapter of the novel in the third person, instead of in the point of view of the final Compson child, Caddy?
Maybe the author did this to show a more objective side to the story. We see throughout the rest of the book that the events that take place are very skewed, because it was either in the point of view of a mentally ill man, a man knowing he was going to drown himself that very day, or a man so filled with bitterness and hatred that none of his claims against the other characters could be taken seriously. I think what William Faulkner wanted was for the readers to get an outside look on what happened in this last part. We could actually make up our own truths about how the characters are like, instead of relying on the characters messed up truths about the other characters and the different situations they were in. I also donāt think that Caddy was chosen to narrate this last section because I believe that Faulkner wanted his audience to choose who Caddy really is, based on the evidence and opinions that her three siblings form regarding her. If she would have narrated, the whole truth would have been left on the page, and the mystery would be gone. I appreciate the authorās decision to keep her silent because it means that we will never know who Caddy really is. The whole idea of this book was that no one, not even Quentin or Benjy, knows exactly who Caddy is. Faulkner left her a mystery because, perhaps she was a mystery to the people living inside the pages as well. Even though it frustrates me that I cannot completely figure out the focal point of the whole book, it displays William Faulknerās genius. People are seen through the eyes of many, but only they themselves have a clear picture of who they truly are. Nobody in this novel was Caddy, except Caddy herself, so there is no way that she could be understood. We, as the readers, are playing the part of another one of her siblings: we know the memories we share with her, her different characteristics and traits, what she has done, even what she smells like, but we do not know her, and that is whatās so beautiful about Caddy. The fact that she doesnāt have a voice in this novel speaks louder than the voice she would have had if the author did give her one.