The Body Positive Movement is the Byproduct of Shame CultureâŠ
And I mean that. Most movements are based on a victimâperpetrator dynamic. Shame cultureâmeaning the practice of shaming people who donât meet the body and beauty standards of the time, which shift every decade or soâcreated what we now know as the bodyâpositive movement.
Just as the civil rights movement arose from racial injustices against Black people, and LGBTQ+ labels emerged as a response to discrimination and oppression under heteronormative propaganda. Making heterosexuality the default has harmed everyone, forcing us to create labels simply to understand one anotherâbecause everyone is unique in who they are. The issue is that weâve normalized bullying as a method of compliance.
Iâm late to the game, but I did watch Jillian Michaels vs. 20 BodyâPositive Activists, and I have thoughts. First of all, that woman is the wrong person to represent or handle anything related to obesity and health as a whole. I wouldâve had her removed from the premises the moment she said âfat body.â But this is an entertainment platform that thrives on negativity and poor bedside manners. What she said right out of the gate was unprofessional and passively fatphobic, making her biases front and center and the environment unsafe. Jillian is not a safe professional to debate or even discuss obesity with the public. When someone uses a passive slur and refuses to retract it, they should be removed entirely.
âFat bodyâ is a passive slurâjust like when someone says, âYou look cute for being a Black guy.â Thatâs passive racism. Some people are unaware, while others know exactly what theyâre doingâbeing racist, homophobic, or fatphobic, as Jillian was, by making backhanded comments. To maintain integrity, I wouldâve given her an ultimatum: âRetract your statement and apologize for your behavior, or leave the premises. Youâre done.â
Jubilee is not an ethical debate channel, by the wayâitâs entertainment. Real debates have rules of decorum. On entertainment platforms like Jubilee, those rules are lifted because viewership matters more than maintaining a safe space or having meaningful discussions.
I noticed people saying Jillian was composed and âate the activists up.â Peeps, she lost. Nothing she said made a difference. The point of a debate is to plant a seed of understanding and possibly change someoneâs perspective. She lost brutally. She reacted like a rabbit backed into a corner by wolvesâhorrible analogy, but it fits. By saying âfatâbodiedâ right at the start, she invalidated the debaterâs feelings, triggering everyone in the room. When people feel threatened, they stop focusing on the question and instead plead emotionally for the perpetrator to see their perspective. Jillian became the perpetrator of that debate.
We, the viewers, arenât going to feel as threatenedâbut the people in that room did. Itâs a different experience when the bully is physically present. People who shame others are perpetrators. It doesnât matter if they claim to âmean well.â Noâwellâmeaning people are careful with their words and make every effort not to say anything that could be perceived as threatening. Iâm always aware of that with people I donât know or care about. But with illâmannered people who do horrible things, I take intentional jabsâbecause Iâm human, and I absolutely detest people who act cruelly toward others.
In Jillianâs case, throughout the debates, she was not mindful of her words and let her extreme biases slip out often. Thatâs the ârabbit backed into a cornerâ effect Jillian was experiencingâshe felt threatened because the activists were revealing their trauma as a defense.
Iâll say this again: Jillian created an unsafe environment. She needed to be removed. The entire debate was doomed from the start because of that. There were no âgotchaâ moments or Jillian âowningâ anyoneâshe lost. And not only that, she made herself look bad on social media to professionals.
Jillian always makes herself look bad. People forget that she and her coâstar on The Biggest Loser almost had someone die on their watch. If that person had diedâand she technically did, flatlining while being medevacked outâthat would have been Jillianâs fault, her coâstarâs, and the productionâs. Just because contestants sign a disclosure agreement doesnât mean they arenât responsible if someone dies. Jillian was lucky no one died on her watch. Iâve met people who have had someone die under their supervision, and they left their careers entirely because of it. Some have even taken their own lives because they couldnât live with the guilt of being directly or indirectly responsible for someoneâs death. Others, even when not directly involved, left their careers after such tragedies.
My father once experienced something similar. He was in charge of training cyclists and wasnât even on siteâhe was on vacation with my mother and meâwhen he got the call that one of his students had suffered from hyponatremia during an outdoor training course. It was a hot day, and the man had been drinking gallons of water. He collapsed suddenly, and by the time the ambulance arrived, he had died. Let me tell you, men can cry. My dad had to pull over and bawl his eyes out. The student was young, and my father knew him and his family. After that, every precaution was taken when training in heatâhow to hydrate properly without risking water poisoning.
So Jillian, as a fitness influencer, should not be anywhere near the bodyâpositive movement. Sheâs primarily an entertainer, focused on her career rather than peopleâs wellâbeing. Iâm not saying Jillian is evilâshe just cares about herself and wants to make money as an entertainment fitness influencer. Many influencers are like that; it opens more pathways to upward mobility. Thatâs why Jillian, a conservative lesbian, is completely out of touch. As a white, cisgender lesbian woman, she has more pathways to success under capitalism than she would if she were progressive or humanitarian. Capitalism drives peopleâs focus.
Jillian is also egocentric. It was obvious right away when she used medical terminology as a tactic of superiorityâeven after her debaters asked her to use words they could understand, saying, âWe are not doctors.â The twenty activists were trying to get Jillian to respect them and meet them at their level of understanding. Jillian struggled to do that. If she truly wanted to connect, she wouldâve used accessible language from the start. But for Jillian, it was a âsmart person contest.â That was another indicator she lostâshe treated it as a superiority contest.
Debates are supposed to plant seeds of understanding and help people see different perspectives. Thatâs not what happened.
Itâs why I canât debate anyone on the topic of a cosmic creator. Thereâs no evidence to prove or disprove that a cosmic creator exists. Neither side has conclusive evidence, so itâs always a stalemate. When someone argues that point, they reveal how little they understand about how knowledge expands. As Iâve said in other blogs, radio waves existed before we created radiosâwe had to invent radios to discover and use those waves.
Thatâs why I say humility is the opposite of arrogance. Humility allows expansivenessâthe ability to admit we donât know everything yet. You can tell when someone is rooted in arrogance because they refuse to acknowledge that. Itâs a matter of introspectionâasking, âWhy do I want a cosmic creator not to exist?â or, in Jillianâs case, âWhy am I in the health industry? Why am I in entertainment fitness?â
She has to admit to herself that it was never truly about helping people. Jillian prefers being an entertainer to being a figure of health and fitness. Thatâs why she was capable of acting so horribly on cameraâbeing filmed gave her permission to be the worst version of herself. She chose to present that persona, and even in that debate, she continued to embody it.
The way to deal with people like that is to remove them as credible voices in fitness and healthâbecause biases get in the way of helping others.
I would never in my life say to any of the women I know with a larger body mass that they are âfatâbodied.â And if something I say ever comes out the wrong way, I apologize immediately when called out. I deeply care about the people in my life and their wellâbeing, no matter their body type. Many of them are beautiful to me because of their sense of fashion, their humor, their kindness toward my own wellâbeing, and the way they carry themselvesâletting their personalities shine.
One friendâs fashion sense blows my mind. Every time she walks into a room, I notice her outfit of the hour. Sheâs adjacent to goth but far more posh and upscale with the brands she wears. Sheâs witty with words and makes it her mission to tease me as much as possibleâbut always respectfully. I usually play along. Both she and her husband are a joy to be around during group meetings and events.
Most of my longâterm relationships have been with women who are bodyâshamed by society for their size. I always gave them extra love to remind them they were the most gorgeous women to me. Fuck everyone else whoâs a hater.
Now, I was concerned about their health, so I cooked often and made a habit of doing things together that benefited both of us. Most people with larger body mass are aware of their health circumstances. More mass around the belly can be concerning because visceral fat surrounds the organsâbut in many women, midsection fat is often linked to hormonal imbalances.
During my fourâyear relationship, my partner needed hormonal therapy because her midsection carried most of the fat, while her limbs were muscularâshe could easily lift a hundred pounds at the gym and worked heavy manual labor. But she couldnât afford hormonal therapy because of the broken healthcare system here in the U.S. So, you make do in life.
But Iâll end it at that.
Shaming people is the reason the bodyâpositivity movement exists in the first place.
We canât heal shame with more shame. The bodyâpositive movement isnât about perfection; itâs about reclaiming dignity.