baileysfromaboot replied to your post:
Which is terrifying when you realize that life guarding classes still teach rescue breathing, or they did a year ago.
goldfishtobleroneandamitie replied to your post:
Actually, the Red Cross still does (I'm a lifeguard) but we have special masks for it and they're really only for prolonged not-breathing situations...like if they have a pulse but are continually not breathing. Using your mouth is inefficient and more likely to get you sick than anything else. Didn't see the episode; was it a drowning victim, or what?
I don't know how it applies to drowning, specifically, but I know that in the case that you find someone not breathing, it is not only inefficient but actually DANGEROUS (to the patient who I almost just referred to as a victim, mother of God more than to the rescuer, but also that person, yes) to do rescue breaths, particularly for untrained Good Samaritans. I think this is more about cardiovascular complaints than drowning; when it comes to expelling water from lungs, it possibly has an application.
In this case, the patient had not drowned, and he didn't even DO chest compressions on her, and I just... can't... even.