#azmun

Azmun: ...how would that help?

In the latest United States Constitutional Convention meeting United States representatives gathered to discuss plans of progression and attainment of economical stability.

Delegates discussed their thoughts on ideas of central government and representation for the country’s best interest. In a moderated caucus, Massachusetts showed favor towards bicameralism, and the appointment of a central leader.

Officials stated that this would alleviate all problems. When asked how this leader would be appointed, officials stated that they would be voted in, and each vote should be accounted equally.

New Hampshire responded with an “adjustment” to the plan and stated that the bicameral legislation should be split into two major divisions, one for wealth management, and one for governing. Virginia also included their views on how important trade management is when choosing a form of representation.

Representative of New York stated: “For the best interest of this country, we need a bicameral legislation.”

New York officials also had faith that the newly founded government will not turn into a tyranny, for the people of the country have majority say. When asked how the officials should be selected the representative stated, “Officials should be voted in, and states should have majority say by population, and not by wealth.”

By: Razanne Chatila

Syrian President Bashar Assad recently had an on-camera interview with a Portuguese state news outlet, RTP. The interview  showed the President very adamant in pointing out the differences between the “West” and the ongoing situation in Syria while trying to divert attention on the ongoing unrest and casualties. During the interview, Assad said, “The West has no desire to combat terrorism....West Channels money and armaments to ISIS.” It seems that these more frequent news appearance are a tactic President Assad is trying to utilize to continue diverting attention on the current state of Syria especially amid allegations of chemical warfare. Click here for a full text of the interview.

By: Gurjinder Dosanjh

The ongoing situation in Syria has resulted in 220,000 casualties and counting. Many of these casualties have been an outcome of chemical warfare. Both rebels and government officials have blamed each other for the use of these deadly chemicals. As a result, the United States has circulated a draft resolution on March 5 to stop the use of chlorine in Syria. According to reports by OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons), the chlorine was dropped directly from helicopters. Representatives from France and Britain have showed anger towards Syrian government knowing that only the government has accessibility to helicopter usage. The new draft proposed by the United States implements further consequences to the original 2013 draft that bans use of chemicals. The draft states that such actions should be imposed under section 7 and can result in military enforcement.

In 2013, Syria joined OPCW and declared a 1,300-ton chemical arsenal, which has since been destroyed by OPCW. OPCW has destroyed two chemical facilities so far, and plans to destroy 12 more by this summer according to a news report by the International Business Times. As a result of this chemical frenzy many are wondering what the Arab League plans to do to halt chemical warfare. Some might even ask, how does the Arab league plan on meditating not just the situation, but the rage filled citizens of Syria also. In the upcoming issue of MUNdi, we will interview delegates from the Arab League and find out exactly what their plans are to solve these problems. We also welcome your comments below on possible suggestions from your respective delegations.