Jenny Holzer / Mikko Kuorinki
Both artists Jenny Holzer and Mikko Kuorinki produce art works that examine language, relationships and self.
1. Jenny Holzer
Holzer's Truisms (1977-9) series consists of statements and original thoughts which Holzer displays in print as well as publicly in the form of signs and landscape projections. Her work is not only a beautiful exploration of language and inspiration, it reveals the internal conflicts of self as well as critiques and provides commentary on social and political issues.
Holzer's projection and sign work thrusts truths and knowledge into the everyday public landscape, provoking intelligent thought as well as self-reflection. The public presentation and various mediums of Holzer's Truisms make her work very accessible and relatable while simultaneously possessing a unique voice that is succinct, powerful and poetic.
2. Mikko Kuorinki
Kuorinki's Wall Piece with 200 Letters (2010-1) is a similar exploration of language and an examinations of personal relationships and the psyche. However, Kuorinki's work resides inside a museum rather than Holzer's intricate intigration with the public sphere. Additionally, Kuorinki's work examines the relationship between individual self and surrounding realities through the limitations of 200 letters. Each day, Kuorinki exhibited a new phrase or statement on the gallery wall using and rearranging a collection of 200 letters. Therefore, each day revealed a new thought, personal truth or expression.
While the voices and presentations of the art of Jenny Holzer and Mikko Kuorinki have distinct differences in the categories of personal voice and relation to the public realm, both beautifully experiment with language and the power of expressing thoughts and realizations. Holzer's work greatly examines the relationships between the self and others as well as strong social and political critique, while Kuorinki's work is more representative of the conflict and contemplations of the individual mind and depression. Though Holzer's work makes direct contact to everyday public life and therefore has a wider reach, Kuorinki's daily alternations and unique examination of the possibilities within a limited range of letters is equally admirable.
Holzer and Kuorinki's comparable love of language and experimentation with expression and thought illustrate how artists with similar mediums can share an artistic connection while at the same time maintaining their distinct voices and presenting to the public/audience in respectively compelling and interesting ways.













