In Becoming, you imply that Phillip and Alexander of Epiros had an affair. Is this historically accurate? How would Olympias have felt about it, especially if she was close to her brother- would she gave been jealous or worried for him?
Philip and Alexander of Epiros (and some Epirote history)
Olympias wasnāt that much older than Alexander of Epiros, and exactly when he came to Macedon isnāt settled. Justin gives the most details (8.6), as well as the titbit that, as he was āa youth of remarkable beauty,ā Philip pursued and seduced him. Justin loves the salacious details (as did his source Pompeius Trogus), so he makes it sound as if Philip preyed on the boy. Justin generally portrays Philip as a bad person, so itās just part of his general narrative. Nonetheless, when Alexander arrived in Macedon has a lot to do with the likelihood of any affair. If his arrival was closer to 350 than earlier in 356/55 (when Alexander the Great was born), heād have been ātoo old.ā I suspect he was younger, because if he made it to 18-20 alive, Philip didnāt need to bring him to Macedon to protect him (see below).
Neoptolemos (I, the Elder), father of Olympias and Alexander (and Troas), died somewhere around 360. This is when Perdikkas II was still king, and the height of raids by Bardylis the Illyrian, who basically terrorized all his neighbors. As a result, it appears that Perdikkas II and Neoptolemos (and/or Arrybas) may have forged an alliance, betrothing Olympias to Perdikkasās younger brother Philip to unite their kingdoms into a wall against the Illyrians. Obviously, this didnāt work. The Illyrians killed Perdikkas on the battlefield in 359. Neoptolemos also died about the same time (how isnāt clear but as they donāt say battle, it was probably of something else). He and Arrybas had split the rule between them. This isnāt weird for Eprios, who also had a council. In short, it was a less absolute monarchy than Macedon.
Thessaly, Epiros and Macedon were all on a āmonarchy continuum,ā if you will. Thessaly at one end, Macedon the other, and Epiros in the middle. What that means is more or less consolidation behind not just a royal house (or four houses in Thessalyās case) but behind its leading male member (the king). So when Jason of Phaerae made a bid to become ātyrant,ā it might be more accurate to say he made a bid to become king.
In any case, Arrybas was married to Troas, the eldest child of Neoptolemos, but whether Neoptolemos married her to his brother (a common thing: uncle-niece marriages) or Arrybas married her after Neoptolemos died is unclear, as weāre not sure how old she was. Alexander (the youngest) was born c. 370. We donāt even know when Olympias was born, but if she was 14-16 upon her marriage (the most typical age), and Alexander born about a year (?) later, then she was probably born somewhere between 373-71. And that would likely make Troas old enough to have been married to Arrybas by her father, although far from certain. The fact OLYMPIAS (or really, Polyxena-Myrtale at the time) was the one betrothed to Philip strongly suggests that Troas was already either married or promised to her uncle.
Anyway, the two brothers had split rule regionally, so when Neoptolemos died, he left an underage heir, a betrothed daughter, and a married (?) daughter. Olympias was shipped off to Macedon about 3 years after her fatherās death (c. 357), and Alexander of Macedon was born a year after. With one sister in the house of his rival (willingly or not) and the other in Macedon, the child Alexander was isolated. Arrybas wouldnāt have killed him immediately; that wouldāve looked bad. Plus, not long after his brother died, the Illyrians invaded yet again and Arrybas evacuated the people, let the Illyrians plunder, then fell on them when they didnāt expect it.
The victory made Arrybas look good for his people. He just needed Troas to give him a son and he could quietly move Alexander out of sight somewhereāthen possibly kill himāand keep control of the whole thing. This is the SAME thing Philip II had done earlier with Perdikkas IIIās son Amyntas. Fortunately for Amyntas, he was only about a year old (with no older siblings), so by the time he reached a ādangerousā age (e.g., early adolescence), his uncle was so firmly entrenched, Amyntas was no threat at all and Philip could be generous and let him live, even marry him to his eldest daughter (who wasnāt that much younger than him).
By contrast, Kassandrosāfar less firmly in control and acting as āprotectorā for the son of Alexander III (even if the boyās mother was an unpopular āfurrinerā)āhad to kill Alexander IV. He really had no choice. As long as an Argead lived, nobody else could take the throne. Yet he doesnāt kill Alexander IV until heās post pre-pubescence (c. 14).
Arrybasās problems are closer to Kassandrosās. While he wasnāt unpopular, at least at first, he wasnāt anywhere close to as powerful/successful as Philip, and his nephew was older from the start. Plus he and his brother had already split rule, so it was a lot harder for him to argue Alexander of Epiros shouldnāt take over his fatherās regions when he turned 16.
THATāS likely why Philip removed Alexander to his court, using Alexanderās sister as an excuse. It may even have started with a āvisitā that turned permanent. (Weāre told so little, itās hard to know how he got there.) Philip knew Arrybas couldnāt let Alexandros live much longer, at least not if he wanted to keep the whole thing.
Justin does suggest Philip meant him to take over the whole thing all along. Maybe, but far from certain. Philip did want him in charge of what had been his fatherās portion. Once he was of age, he could go back and the council could recognize him. By 343 (not long after book 1, Becoming, opens), Philip finally was able to push out Arrybas entirely and hand Epiros to his brother-in-law.
Back to Alexander of Epiros as one in Philipās revolving door of boyfriends ⦠itās hard to say. But as a prince, only a king would be high enough to court him. (Remember, thatās the big objection to/problem for Hephaistion in Becoming.) So I think itās entirely possible they did have a fling. Archelaos earlier had made a āprinceā of Thessaly his lover (prince isnāt the right word, but Thessaly had a noble class), and Pausanias of Orestes was also from the Orestian royal house. We may find it strange for Philip to be courting the younger brother of one of his wives, but for the Greeks, not as much. After all, if the new boyfriend who followed Pausanias was Hegelochos, not āPausaniasā (there is debate as to whether or not the name is a duplication error),* then Philip would later marry that boy's younger sister.
-------------------
*In the novels, I decided to follow that fish. The reason was two-fold. First, the names are already weird enough. Having TWO Pausaniases involved in the same novel and same event in the novel wouldāve been really confusing. The option to use Hegelochos helped. Second, whoever the new favorite was, Attalos clearly cared about him. A LOT. Hegelochos would have been his nephew. By contrast, we donāt know of a Pausanias in that family. There certainly could have been, but name mangling and name duplication arenāt uncommon. You can imagine why. I have some baptismal records for my own family from Vincennes IN, and the same personās last name is spelling three different ways (apparently by different priests) in the same collection. And that was the late 1700s!











