Top Posts Tagged with #aphanosaur

Teleocrater rhadinus

By Ripley Cook

Etymology: Completed Basin

First Described By: Nesbitt et al., 2017

Classification: Biota, Archaea, Proteoarchaeota, Asgardarchaeota, Eukaryota, Neokaryota, Scotokaryota Opimoda, Podiata, Amorphea, Obazoa, Opisthokonta, Holozoa, Filozoa, Choanozoa, Animalia, Eumetazoa, Parahoxozoa, Bilateria, Nephrozoa, Deuterostomia, Chordata, Olfactores, Vertebrata, Craniata, Gnathostomata, Eugnathostomata, Osteichthyes, Sarcopterygii, Rhipidistia, Tetrapodomorpha, Eotetrapodiformes, Elpistostegalia, Stegocephalia, Tetrapoda, Reptiliomorpha, Amniota, Sauropsida, Eureptilia, Romeriida, Diapsida, Neodiapsida, Sauria, Archosauromorpha, Crocopoda, Archosauriformes, Eucrocopoda, Crurotarsi, Archosauria, Avemetarsalia, Aphanosauria

Status: Extinct

Time and Place: Possibly 247 million years ago, in the Anisian age of the Middle Triassic

Teleocrater is known from the Lifua Member of the Manda Formation in Tanzania

Physical Description: Teleocrater was a long, slender reptile measuring 2.1 to 3 meters long from snout to tail tip. It had a long, narrowing skull with small, very pointed teeth lining the insides. Its nostrils were at the tip of its snout, while its eyes were deep in its head. In a lot of weird ways, its skull kind of looked like that of a Monitor Lizard. However, it was no lizard. It had a very long neck, with some of the longest neck vertebrae of any bird-line Archosaur (Avemetatarsalia). These vertebrae were weirdly ornamented in addition to long, which turns out to have been a defining feature of this early offshoot in the bird-line group (Aphanosaurs). These vertebrae get taller and taller as they continue down the neck, unique for Teleocrater. It only had two vertebrae on its pelvis, unlike the contemporaneous dinosaur Nyasasaurus that had three, indicating its lower position on the bird-line tree. It also had small nubbins coming off of its ribs like seen in other early Avemetatarsalians. It had long legs, going out to the sides and not under the body, with very small hands and normally-proportioned feet. It didn’t have very long feet compared to its legs like those seen in Ornithodirans, indicating it wasn’t very fast or adapted to running like in those other animals. Despite being in Avemetatarsalia, Teleocrater had an ankle more closely like those of the ancestral condition - ie, the crocodilian ankles rather than the firmly connected ankles of the pterosaurs and dinosaurs. Teleocrater also had a long tail, giving it an overall very elongated appearance.

It is uncertain what Teleocrater would have been covered in. It is a very distinct and notable mid-point in the bird-line evolution - it is a part of the earliest group to branch off on this portion of the tree of life and it lacks many of the defining characteristics of Avemetatarsalians, including the one from which they got their name. That said, it doesn’t preserve osteoderms like in Pseudosuchians, indicating that these structures were lost in even the earliest Avemetatarsalians (and only regained later in some unique dinosaur groups). So - did it have floof? We don’t know. We probably will never know. Unlike other small bird-line archosaurs of the time, it’s a 50/50 shot.

Diet: Thanks to the very well preserved teeth, we know for a fact that Teleocrater was a carnivore.

Behavior: Teleocrater may have oddly resembled living monitor lizards from a far and may have had much in common with living Crocodilians in its skeleton, but it - like other early Archosaurs - would have most likely been endothermic, living a very active lifestyle. The bones of this animal indicate that it grew rapidly, much more so than earlier archosaurs (which have decent evidence for at least partial endothermy), though less so of dinosaurs and pterosaurs. This would have looked interesting with its splayed-out legs, and it probably would have run very clumsily and slowly given its small hands and non-adapted for fast movement feet. That said, it could have used its increased activity to aid in catching prey that other reptiles couldn't, to help get away from predators, and in general be a weird active possibly fluffy lizard dude. You know. Like Varactyl from Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Except without front feet. Or, useful front feet. It was weird. It may or may not have been social. We have no evidence either way - while it was common, it was also a carnivore, so it probably wouldn’t have gotten much out of being in social groups in such a crowded ecosystem. That said, it was an archosaur, and archosaurs should be assumed to take care of their young without evidence to the contrary. Modern archosaurs across the board, except the weird and highly unique Megapodes, take care of their young - so Teleocrater would have too. That said, both Crocodilians and Birds have unique nesting strategies, so we can’t look to them for clues into how Teleocrater took care of its young.

Ecosystem: Teleocrater lived in the amazing Manda Beds Formation, a seasonally arid river valley floodplain in the heart of Tanzania where many early and fascinating reptiles appeared as the Triassic began to go into full swing. Teleocrater probably came at least a little earlier than more famous animals of the formation - it comes from the Lower portion of the Lifua Member, while Asilisaurus and Nyasasaurus, among others, came from the Upper portion. That said, it wasn’t much earlier, and the exact ecology is still a little murky. Teleocrater itself was found with the large Dicynodont Dolichuranus, the smaller cynodont Cynognathus, the temnospondyl Stanocephalosaurus, an unnamed Allokotosaurian, and the Ctenosauriscid Hypselorhachis. So, the explosion of the reptiles was still not quite there - but Teleocrater represented change in the winds to come. It probably would have been able to feed on many of the other animals in its environment, given its fairly large size.

Other: Once upon a time, a fossil that would tell us much about the evolution of bird-line archosaurs and ruling reptiles in general sat unstudied in a cabinet in the Natural History Museum of London. Then, a young scientist described this animal as Teleocrater in a PhD Thesis - which means it wasn’t officially named, making it a nomen nudum - a naked name. It would take nearly sixty years for more parts of Teleocrater - parts that could actually be described and talked about, as opposed to the locked-away remains of the thesis - to be found and properly described, bringing us Teleocrater, officially, at last. This important discovery was of the oldest bird-line Archosaur known, beating the previous record holders, Asilisaurus and Nyasasaurus, by quite a few million years. It helped to piece together the evolution of the bird-line Archosaurs, see where certain traits (including the famed ankles) actually appeared, and also lead to the formation of a new group of animals entirely - the Aphanosaurs. Many weird early dinosaur-esque creatures that formerly didn’t have a home have now been placed in the Aphanosaur group, giving them a home at last - and showing how diverse bird-line archosaurs were outside of the famed Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs. Given their fast growth rate and potential fluff (though that’s a 50/50 shot) but splayed out legs and lizard-like appearance they - rather than dinosaurs - probably deserve the name “Lizard-Birds”, as they look like lizards, but their closest living relatives are birds. Other Aphanosaurs include Yarasuchus, Spondylosoma, and Dongusuchus.

~ By Meig Dickson

Sources Under the Cut

Angolin, F. L., M. D. Ezcurra. 2019. The Validity of Lagosuchus talampayensis Romer, 1971 (Archosauria, Dinosauriformes) from the Late triassic of Argentina. Breviora 565 (1): 1 - 21.

Benton, M. J. 1999. Scleromochlus taylori and the origin of dinosaurs and pterosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences 354 (1388): 1423 - 1446.

Benton, M. J. 2004. Origin and relationships of Dinosauria. In David B. Weishampel; Peter Dodson; Halszka Osmólska (Hrsg.) (eds.). The Dinosauria. Berkeley: Zweite Auflage, University of California Press. pp. 7–19.

Botha-Brink, J., R. M. H. Smith. 2011. Osteohistology of the Triassic Archosauromorphs Prolacerta, Proterosuchus, Euparkeria, and Erythrosuchus from the Karoo Basin of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31 (6): 1238 - 1254.

Brusatte, S. L., M. J. Benton, J. B. Desojo, M. C. Langer. 2010. The higher-level phylogeny of Archosauria (Tetrapoda: Diapsida). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 8 (1): 3 - 47.

Brusatte, S. L., G. Niedzwiedzki, R. J. Butler. 2010. Footprints pull origin and diversification of dinosaur stem lineage deep into Early Triassic. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278 (1708): 1107 - 1113.

Butler, R. J., P. M. Barrett, R. L. Abel, D. J. Gower. 2009. A possible Ctenosauriscid Archosaur from the Middle Triassic Manda Beds of Tanzania. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29 (4): 1022 - 1031.

Butler, R. J., S. J. Nesbitt, A. J. Charig, D. J. Gower, and P. M. Barrett. 2018. Mandasuchus tanyauchen, gen. et sp. nov., a pseudosuchian archosaur from the Manda Beds (?Middle Triassic) of Tanzania. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Memoir 37 (suppl.):96-121.

Cau, A. 2018. The assembly of the avian body plan: a 160-million-year-long process. Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana 57 (1): 1 - 25.

Charig, A. J. 1957. New Triassic archosaurs from Tanganyika, including Mandasuchus and Teleocrater: Dissertation Abstracts, Cambridge University.

Chinsamy, A. 1990. Physiological implications of the bone histology of Syntarsus rhodesiensis (Saurischia: Theropoda). Palaeontological Africana 27: 77 - 82.

Diaz-Molina, M. 1993. Geometry and Lateral Accretion Patterns in Meander Loops: Examples from the Upper Oligocene–Lower Miocene, Loranca Basin, Spain. In Marzo, M.; Puigdefábregas, C. (eds.). Alluvial Sedimentation. Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists. 17. pp. 115–131.

Dzik, J. 2003. A beaked herbivorous archosaur with dinosaur affinities from the early Late Triassic of Poland. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23 (5): 556 - 574.

Elgin, R. A., D. W. Hone, E. Frey. 2011. The Extent of the Pterosaur Flight Membrane. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (1): 99 - 111.

Ezcurra, M. D. 2016. The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriformes. PeerJ 4: e1778.

Ezcurra, M. D., S. J. Nesbitt, L. E. Fiorelli, J. B. Desojo. New Specimen Sheds Light on the Anatomy and Taxonomy of the Early Late Triassic Dinosauriforms from the Chañares Formation, NW Argentina. 2019. The Anatomical Record doi:10.1002/ar.24243.

Fostowicz - frelik, L., T. Sulej. 2010. Bone histology of Silesaurus opolensis from the Late Triassic of Poland. Lethaia 43 (2): 137 - 148.

Gauthier, J. A. 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. The origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. K. Padian (ed.), Memoirs of the california Academy of Sciences 8: 1 - 55.

Gauthier, J., K. de Queiroz. 2001. Feathered dinosaurs,f lying dinosaurs, crown dinosaurs, and the name Aves. pp. 7 - 41 in Gauthier, J. and L. F. Gall (eds.) New Perspectives on the Origin and early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. New Haven: Peabody Museum of Natural History.

Griffen, C. T., S. J. Nesbitt. 2016. The Femoral Ontogeny and Long Bone Histology of the Middle Triassic (?Late Anisian) Dinosauriform Asilisaurus kongwe and Implications for the Growth of Early Dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 36 (3): e1111224.

Kubo, T., M. O. Kubo. 2012. Associated evolution of bipedality and cursoriality among Triassic archosaurs: a phylogenetically controlled evaluation. Paleobiology 38 (3): 474 - 485.

Langer, M. C., M. J. Benton. 2006. Early Dinosaurs: A phylogenetic study. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 4 (4): 309 - 358.

Langer, M. C., M. D. Ezcurra, J. S. Bittencourt, F. E. Novas. 2010. The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs. Biological Reviews 85 (1): 55 - 110.

Lautenschlager, S.; Desojo, J. B. 2011. Reassessment of the Middle Triassic rauisuchian archosaurs Ticinosuchus ferox and Stagonosuchus nyassicus. Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 85 (4): 357–381.

Lloyd, G. T., D. W. Bapst, M. Friedman, K. E. Davis. 2017. Probabilistic divergence time estimation without branch lengths: dating the origin of dinosaurs, avian flight and crown birds. Biology Letters 12: 20160609.

Nesbitt, S. J., C. A. Sidor, R. B. Irmis, K. D. Angielczyk, R. M. H. Smith, L. A. Tsuji. 2010. Ecologically distinct dinosaurian sister group shows early diversification of Ornithodira. Nature 464 (7285): 95 - 98.

Nesbitt, S. J. 2011. The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 352: 1 - 292.

Nesbitt, S. J., R. J. Butler. 2012. Redescription of the archosaur Parringtonia gracilis from the Middle Triassic Manda beds of Tanzania, and the antiquity of Erpetosuchidae. Geological Magazine 150 (2): 225 - 238.

Nesbitt, S. J., C. A. Sidor, K. D. Angielczyk, R. M. Smith, W. Parker. 2012. Derivation of the aetosaur osteoderm carapace: evidence from a new, exceptionally preserved "stem aetosaur" from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) Manda Beds of southwestern Tanzania. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32 (supp 1): 149.

Nesbitt, S. J., P. M. Barrett, S. Werning, C. A. Sidor, A. J. Charig. 2013. The oldest dinosaur? A Middle Triassic dinosauriform from Tanzania. Biology Letters 9 (1): 20120949.

Nesbitt, S. J., C. A. Sidor, K. D. Angielczyk, R. M. H. Smith, and L. A. Tsuji. 2014. A new archosaur from the Manda beds (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of southern Tanzania and its implications for character state optimizations at Archosauria and Pseudosuchia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34(6):1357-1382.

Nesbitt, S. J., R. J. Butler, M. D. Ezcurra, P. M. Barrett, M. R. Stocker, K. D. Angielczyk, R. M. H. Smith, C. A. Sidor, G. Niedzwiedzki, A. G. Sennikov, and A. J. Charig. 2017. The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan. Nature 544(27):484-487.

Nesbitt, S. J., R. J. Butler, M. D. Ezcurra, A. J. Charig, P. M. Barrett. 2018. The anatomy of Teleocrater rhadinus, an early Avemetatarsalian from the lower portion of the Lifua Member of the Manda Beds (Middle Triassic). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 37 (sup1): 142 - 177.

Nesbitt, S. J., M. C. Langer, M. D. ezcurra. 2019. The Anatomy of Asilisaurus kongwe, a Dinosauriform from the Lifua Member of the Manda Beds (~Middle Triassic) of Africa. The Anatomical Record: 1 - 61.

Padian, K., J. R. Horner, A. Ricqles. 2004. Growth in Small Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs: The Evolution of Archosaurian Growth Strategies. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24 (3): 555 - 571.

Parrish, J. M. 1987. The origin of crocodilian locomotion. Paleobiology 13 (4): 396 - 414.

Ricqles, A., K. Padian, F. Knoll, J. R. Horner. 2008. On the origin of rapid growth rates in archosaurs and their ancient relatives: complementary histological studies on Triassic archosauriforms and the problem of a "phylogenetic signal" in bone histology. Annales de Paleontologie 94 (2): 57 - 76.

Rubidge, B. S. 2005. Re-uniting lost continents – Fossil reptiles from the ancient Karoo and their wanderlust. South African Journal of Geology 108 (1): 135 - 172.

Sen, K. 2005. A new rauisuchian archosaur from the Middle Triassic of India. Paleontology 48 (1): 185 - 196.

Sereno, P. C., A. B. Arcucci. 1994. Dinosaurian precursors from the Middle Triassic of Argentina: Marasuchus lilloensis, gen. Nov. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 14 (1): 53 - 73.

Senter, P. 2005. Phylogenetic taxonomy and the names of the major archosaurian (Reptilia) clades. PaleoBios 25 (3): 1 - 7.

Sereno, P. C. 1991. Basal archosaurs: phylogenetic relationships and functional implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 2, 11 (4s): 1 - 53.

Sidor, C. A., D. A. Vilhena, K. D. Angielczyk, A. K. Huttenlocker, S. J. Nesbitt, B. R. Peecook, J. S. Steyer, R. M. H. Smith, L. J. Tsuji. 2013. Provincialization of terrestrial faunas following the end-Permian mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (2): 8129 - 8133.

Smith, N. D., T. A. Cross, J. P. Dufficy, S. R. Clough. 1989. Sedimentology 36 (1): 1 - 23.

Smith, R. M. H. 1993. Sedimentology and ichnology of floodplain paleosurfaces in the Beaufort Group (late Permian), Karoo Sequence, South Africa. PALAIOS 8 (4): 339 - 357.

Sues, H. D., N. C. Fraser. 2010. Early and Early Middle Triassic in Gondwana. Triassic Life on Land: The Great Transition. New York: Columbia University Press. 19 - 36.

Taylor, M. 2007. Phylogenetic definitions in the pre-PhyloCode era; implications for naming clades under the PhyloCode. PaleoBios 27 (1): 1 - 6.

Tsuji, L. A.; Sobral, G.; Müller, J. 2013. Ruhuhuaria reiszi, a new procolophonoid reptile from the Triassic Ruhuhu Basin of Tanzania. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 12 (7–8): 487–494.

Wopfner, H. 2002. Tectonic and climatic events controlling deposition in Tanzanian Karoo basins. Journal of African Earth Sciences 34 (3): 167 - 177.

Wynd, B. M., B. R. Peecook, M. R. Whitney and C. A. Sidor. 2018. The first occurrence of Cynognathus crateronotus (Cynodontia: Cynognathia) in Tanzania and Zambia, with implications for the age and biostratigraphic correlation of Triassic strata in southern Pangea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 37(Sup. 1):228-239.

Xu, X., S. Mackem. 2013. Tracing the evolution of avian wing digits. Current Biology 23 (12): R538 - 544.

Trending Tags

Last Seen Tags

#aphanosaur

Trending Tags

Last Seen Tags

#aphanosaur