#antitangled

Yes, a joke. You know—humor? The same writers made Tangled Ever After, and the flower girls who braided Rapunzel’s hair haven’t aged a day. So no, she didn’t spend years “finding herself” before marriage. Y’all just took a quirky line and twisted it into a whole fake narrative. 😂

Meanwhile, everyone’s out here defending this “modern, empowered” Rapunzel and dragging the older princesses like Cinderella, Ariel, and Aurora—for what? Marrying in a time where THAT WAS THE ONLY OPTION?? In their eras, you couldn’t just "date" or "live together." Marriage was the only way two people could even be together.

People keep telling me, “Rapunzel couldn’t have said yes right away, she was too traumatized!” Uh, yeah? So was the original Rapunzel. She was literally locked in a tower and abused. And she still said yes to the prince's proposal. Because you know what? Back then, people were terrified of out-of-wedlock pregnancy. THAT WAS THE ACTUAL PLOT of the original story!!!

Why act like traumatized people can’t say yes to love? Why act like a woman needs to see the world before marriage—when she could still see the world while being married?

Marriage. Wasn’t. A. Prison. Especially not in a time where couples were married off at 16 and unmarried women had zero autonomy.

So why the revisionism? Why pretend discrimination never existed? Why erase the original story, culture, and historical reality just to push a modern narrative that directly contradicts the actual meaning of the tale?

Price: (as of – Details) From the brand MONS+GA. Monster meets Game. High Performance comes with Super Fun”Monster” – MONSGA is committed to providing every customer with high-performance cleaning products that excel at cleaning like a ferocious monster devouring all the dirt in your home”Game” – MONSGA desires to turn cleaning into a fun experience by transforming the tedious task of cleaning…

The Tangled series sends a HORRIBLE message about marriage being a "prison," which is the complete opposite of the truth. What even happened to the characters? Flynn’s turned into a dumb sidekick, and Rapunzel? She’s toxic now. She lets everyone insult Flynn without defending him, keeps secrets from him, draws his face on a punching bag, time travels to rewrite his personality, and then rejects his proposal—after she literally would have died for him in the movie. 🙄

And why is everyone ignoring the fact that this story takes place in the 18th century? People—especially princesses—were married off at 16 so they could be together. Marriage wasn’t a choice, it was the only option. No one was living together unmarried back then. Why rewrite history? Why is this now “unrealistic”? Back then, people got married fast because that was reality.

And don’t even try to say this is “canon.” The series was written by someone else than the movie, and it’s NOT the same thing. Disney never intended for Rapunzel to reject Flynn’s proposal—that line at the end of the movie was a JOKE. Tangled Ever After doesn’t look like years later; it’s clear the creators were just trying to fill time. Plus, the Royal Theater still claims they got married quickly after the movie. So much for the series being “canon,” huh?

Tangled fans love to trash older princesses for marrying young and quickly—when it made perfect sense for their time period—but they’re fine with Rapunzel and Flynn being willing to die for each other after THREE DAYS? If the message is “commitment takes time,” then giving up your whole life and freedom for someone should ALSO take time, right? That’s real commitment, not marrying quickly. Huge double standard.

I genuinely cannot believe I even have to say this, but yes—the “after years of asking” line at the end of Tangled was a JOKE. Like... comedy. Humor. Sarcasm. You know—a joke? 😂

It wasn’t a serious plot point. It was a quirky little narrator moment, and everyone in the theater laughed. No one left the movie going, “Wow, what a thoughtful commentary on marriage and commitment.” It was literally just Flynn being Flynn. But now? A whole fandom has taken that one line and turned it into a self-righteous crusade about how marriage = oppression and “commitment takes time,” while somehow forgetting everything else in the movie.

And don’t even try to argue that years passed. Tangled Ever After was made by the same creators, and Rapunzel looks exactly the same. The flower girls who braided her hair haven’t aged a day. You’re really going to tell me it’s been years? Do you not know how aging works? 😅😂

But here’s what really kills me:

The real Rapunzel—yes, the one by the Brothers Grimm—was locked away in a tower, traumatized, isolated, and still said yes to the prince’s proposal. Because in that time period, a man and woman dating without marriage would’ve been a scandal. It wasn’t about “rushing.” It was about survival, dignity, and liberation. Maybe try reading the fairy tale before turning it into a weird anti-marriage manifesto.

Oh—and by the way—the Royal Theatre show at Disneyland even says “they didn’t wait long before getting married.” So much for Disney “canon” claiming otherwise. 😂😂😂

What’s the actual message here? That getting married is oppressive and scary, but giving up your entire life and freedom for someone you barely know is totally healthy? You’re out here romanticizing sacrificing your identity on Day 3, but calling marriage “too fast”? That’s not just ironic—it’s peak hypocrisy.

And let’s be real: if you’re having literal nightmares about marrying someone, and panic when he proposes? That’s not romantic tension. That’s a walking red flag 🚩. Psychology even backs this up. Commitment issues that intense aren’t “quirky”—they’re signs you might not actually love the person.

But hey, let’s keep teaching kids that marriage is a trap, and that emotionally shutting down at the idea of lifelong partnership is empowerment. I’m sure that won’t have any consequences later in life. 🙄