Lost in Translation: Why Benefits Jargon Costs Employees Real Money
Ask any HR director what employees most often complain about during open enrollment and you'll hear the same answer: "I don't understand any of this." That isn't a knock on employees. It's an indictment of the language we use to explain benefits.
Benefits documents are written for compliance, not comprehension. They're full of words like deductible, coinsurance, formulary, and beneficiary β terms that mean something specific to insurers and underwriters, and almost nothing to the people being asked to make decisions in 72 hours.
This isn't a soft, "nice to have" problem. Jargon costs employees real money. It causes them to pick the wrong plan, skip preventive care, miss HSA contributions, and forfeit FSA dollars. And it's the root cause of what the team at OneBenefits calls the chaos-to-clarity gap in benefits communication.
The 5 Worst Jargon Offenders in Benefits
Not every confusing word is equally costly. These five do the most damage, because employees make consequential decisions based on misunderstanding them:
Deductible β Routinely confused with premium or copay. Employees often think a $0 deductible means "free care," not "higher premium."
Coinsurance vs. Copay β These are different things, and the difference is hundreds to thousands of dollars per year on a hospital stay.
Out-of-Pocket Maximum β Many employees believe this is what they'll pay each year, not the ceiling.
In-Network / Out-of-Network β "My doctor takes my insurance" is not the same as "my doctor is in-network." The financial gap can be 4x.
HSA vs. FSA β These accounts have opposite rules on rollovers, eligibility, and ownership. Picking the wrong one is one of the most common β and most expensive β benefits mistakes.
Before and After: What Plain Language Actually Looks Like
Plain language isn't dumbing things down. It's removing the translation layer the employee shouldn't have to do themselves. A few examples:
Benefits-Speak (Before)
Plain Language (After)
You are responsible for satisfying the deductible before the carrier remits payment for covered services.
You pay the first $1,500 of medical bills each year. After that, your plan starts paying.
Coinsurance is your share of costs after meeting the deductible, expressed as a percentage of allowable charges.
Once you've hit your deductible, you split costs with the plan β usually you pay 20%, the plan pays 80%.
Out-of-pocket maximum is the annual limit on what you contribute to in-network covered services.
This is the most you'll ever pay in a year for in-network care. After this, the plan pays 100%.
Eligibility for the HDHP/HSA pairing requires non-enrollment in any disqualifying coverage.
You can only put money in an HSA if your only health plan is the high-deductible one. Not Medicare, not a spouse's PPO.
FSA funds are subject to the use-it-or-lose-it provision absent a grace period or limited carryover.
If you don't spend your FSA money by year-end, you lose it. (A small amount may roll over β check your plan.)
Same information. Same legal accuracy (when properly reviewed). One version gets read; the other gets skimmed and forgotten.
Where AI Earns Its Keep
Plain-language rewriting at scale is exactly the kind of work AI handles well β and the reason it's quietly becoming standard in modern HR teams.
A 60-page benefits guide has hundreds of sentences that need this treatment. No HR team has time to rewrite each one by hand, every plan year, in every language their workforce speaks. AI can produce a first-pass plain-language version of every paragraph in minutes, leaving HR's time for the part that matters: reviewing accuracy, adjusting tone, and approving final copy.
Platforms like OneBenefits are specifically designed for this β they're trained on your benefits documents and generate plain-language explanations, chatbot answers, and email content that stays accurate to your plan while sounding like a human wrote it for the person reading it.
Importantly, the AI isn't deciding anything for the employee. It's just removing the wall of jargon between them and a clear choice.
A 4-Step Plain-Language Audit You Can Run This Week
If you want to see where your communication is hurting you, this audit takes about an hour:
Pick your three most-read benefits emails from last year. (If you don't know which were most read, that's its own problem β track opens.)
Highlight every word a non-HR person wouldn't use in normal conversation. If more than 10% of the email is highlighted, your employees aren't reading it; they're decoding it.
Rewrite the first paragraph at an 8th-grade reading level. Most readability tools (including Word) will score this for free.
Send the rewrite to five non-HR employees and ask them what action it's asking them to take. If they can't answer in one sentence, the copy still isn't working.
Most teams discover the same thing in this exercise: they're not under-communicating. They're communicating in a language their audience doesn't fluently speak.
