@mardu-lesbian -Ā Emeriaās Imperative
So, you talked some about Emrakul moon things. I kind of remember that part in the Eldritch Moon story. Looking at this card, Iām just left scratching my head. First ability: this doesnāt feel like an additional cost, partially because you donāt actuallyĀ āpayā anything and secondly because it affects all players. Second ability: what? Why would you ever do this? At mythic, for seven mana? Third ability: Odd, but okay, sure, whatever, it is what it is. In the end, Iām left just...not understanding this card. It feels like itās trying to meet me halfway, but halfway to another planet, in another solar system, where theyāre playing a different card game.
@mistershinyobject - When Gods Flee
When DO Gods flee? Look, I think you were maybe on the right track - butĀ āsacrifice a Godā is a power play that you could have used much more effectively here. The wording all around just feels a little awkward, and the flavor text doesnāt really add much. Why is this modal, exactly? Mechanically I think that, again, itās on the right track. For two mana... Hm. Phenax would like a word with you about all this. I donāt know, I just feel there was something you were trying to bring together, and Iām left underwhelmed on both fronts.
@reaperfromtheabyss - Adventurous Prankster
Great concept! But the big part about this card that makes me pause is that this really, really should have been an ETB ability. Itās not like she only could come out when there were creatures on an adventure or on the battlefield - she could be summoned whenever, and then part of her personality/ability/flavor is that she can disperse things to make themĀ āget lost.āĀ
This isnāt just with your card - I feel that actually a majority of cards in this contest fell into this trap, whereĀ āif I do then, then this happensā takes mechanical precedent overĀ āI NEED to do X in order to do Y.ā Iām rambling at this point, but I hope that something comes across here. Oh, last point: I really donāt like Sabotage as a keyword. As an ability, yes, keyword, no.
@scienceshaman - rat kindās tithe
Good card. I suggest working on capitalization and whatnot. This card probably could have been at least a runner-up with polished presentation. Frankly, as-is I still enjoy it. Maybe call this one a retroactive runner-up. You donāt have to even have MSE, although it helps. What Iām curious about is... Hm, should it haveĀ āadditionalā or is just the extra draw there good? Maybe it should haveĀ āThenā before all of these. Like,Ā āDraw a card. Then, if X, draw a card. Then, if X, draw a card.ā Thereās no precedent for it so Iām curious! Also, what rarity? I assume uncommon but drawing three cards for three mana in black might necessitate this being a rare.
ā...all cards from your graveyard,ā I believe. But yeah, I grok. For seven mana, I donāt want my opponent getting anything, period. I donāt feel theĀ ātruenessā is complete if your opponent gets one last chance to cast something, yāknow? Now Iām also curious about that second ability, ifĀ āthis wayā as it relates to the additional cost is how the templating works, or ifĀ āthis wayā can only refers to things in its paragraph.Ā āFor each nonland card type exiled with this spell, X.ā I dunno with these new precedents.Ā
@starch255 - Juliet Capulet.
Firstly, English major represent, the flavorās funny/resonant, so letās get that on the table. See my commentary for Reaperās stuff, because this really could have been an ETB ability. Mechanically, for the rest of it, I kinda like having the bouncing effects for these two creatures, and it makes for some difficult and funny combat.Ā ā1W: Exile thisā looks really, really awkward. Maybe if it sacrificed for an effect?
@suitsongirls - Dromokaās Protection
So Safe Passage, for WW instead of 2W, at rare, that requires a dragon to as effective? Iādāve liked a greater benefit. Flavor B+. Good callback to the Dragon mechanic, which I enjoyed.
@thatnewcarsmeli - Infinite Possibilities
ā...exile ALL CARDS from your library.ā The second ability can just shuffle them back into the library (see Mind Sculptor ult.). The last ability... are you talking about cards exiled with Infinite Possibilities? You need to specify where youāre choosing these cards from. There should be a sentence break between theĀ ācardsā andĀ āyou,ā and there doesnāt need to be a comma afterĀ āgain.ā I donāt know if thatās workable in the rules. Lastly, this is a five-mana Emrakul tutor with protective backup in the form of pitch-spells, so thatās something to consider. Oh, wait, or Laboratory Maniac too.
@tmstage - Solar Ignition
Iām on board for this card with everything exceptĀ āexile a legendary creature or planeswalker you control.ā Pitching your hand, sure. Getting your stuff into protective morph shells, awesome. Iād make it seven, but w/e. Board wipe, nice. But why that specific exile? I dunno, Iām not seeing that specific flavor. Also, theĀ āifā clause should be part of the additional cost, I feel, because of theĀ āthis way.ā I need to emphasize: this is a creative, fascinating, powerful card. Just needs a little polish!
@wpandp - Harmonic Entropy
I know what youāre getting at, but this card is still a break. Not a flavor bend, a break. One of redās underlying weaknesses is the inability to destroy target enchantments. And if Iām running a mono-red deck, Iāll play this, pitch a hybrid card, and go about my merry way. I really canāt bridge this gap with you.
Thank you all for your many, many entries this week. I think I have an interesting contest for you Commander folks tomorrow. We shall see! Be well, be cool.