Insanity and sanity are not mutually exclusive under the legal doctrines considering the burden of proof.
Hank Roberts, trusting that science can do better than law.

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from Israel

seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Spain
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Denmark
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan

seen from Brazil
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from Spain
Insanity and sanity are not mutually exclusive under the legal doctrines considering the burden of proof.
Hank Roberts, trusting that science can do better than law.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A Squadron of Strawmen Eating Red Herrings
I’m suggesting that your Bad hominem’s a bad omen: It labels a squadron of Strawmen eating red herrings On board of a black helicopter On its way to your house, Figuratively speaking.
Mann et al are bad. The hockey stick is bad. Therefore, climate change isn’t real. Just ask Freeman Dyson. He’s a real scientist.
Gryposaurus, reasoning narratively.
Hypocrisy Sandwiches
Jeff,
Here’s the last sentence from the article to which we are alluding:
Appeal to Hypocrisy
The “walking the walk” argument is often used as a stick to attack those who signal a certain problem.
Indeed, it can be classified as a tu quoque, or an appeal to hypocrisy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
There are legitimate and illegimate uses. It depends if what one does matters to what one says.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A fantastic example of a straw man eating a red herring.
Greg Wellman, making me smile.
Guess Not
[**A good example of Bart's Crane style.**] JC: ” I would be particularly interested in hearing from any defenders of these global paleotemperature analyses by Mann et al.” Ok, sounds like you’re interested in having a constructive discussion and would like to understand where they (the “defenders”) are coming from. JC: “Continuing to defend these kinds of graphs is beyond anything I can understand.” Hmm, guess not. [**Note that Bart's point is not about logic, but about pragmatics.**]
People laughed at Galileo, people are laughing at me, therefore I am Galileo"
Brian, paraphrasing the Galileo fallacy.