#@wapo

Our Analysis

This is fake news tweet 588. Words used to have meaning. See all the fake news tweets at http://trumptweettrack.com/fakenews.html There is a 81% chance that Donald Trump wrote this tweet himself.

This is tweet number 115 mentioning the Washington Post from @realdonaldtrump -- 72 since inauguration. This is tweet number 660 mentioning the fake/lame/mainstream news media from @realdonaldtrump -- 639 since inauguration. This is tweet number 588 mentioning 'Fake News' from @realdonaldtrump -- 578 since inauguration.

Word probabilities: 70/29 (Trump/Staff) Time probabilities: 69/30 (Trump/Staff) Metadata probabilities: 93/6 (Trump/Staff) Posted at: Sun Nov 24 14:58:51 2019 EST [Link] Tweet Source: Twitter for iPhone

The most informative terms in this tweet were: great (Trump, 1.4:1), well (Trump, 1.8:1), book (Trump, 1.4:1), justice (Other, 1.7:1), badly (Trump, 13.6:1), & (Other, 2.3:1), disaster (Trump, 1.6:1), many (Trump, 8.4:1), fake (Trump, 27.7:1), news (Trump, 7.2:1), like (Trump, 3.1:1), ! (Trump, 1.3:1)

A computer sees the following emotions in this tweet (NRC): {'positive': 2, 'trust': 2, 'negative': 4, 'sadness': 2, 'anger': 1, 'disgust': 1, 'fear': 1, 'surprise': 1}

Grade level of this tweet (Flesch-Kincaid): 6.4

This is a great and well reseached book on Justice K. The Ruth Marcus book is a badly written & reseached disaster. So many incorrect facts. Fake News, just like the @washingtonpost! https://t.co/i6GwghuEsU

Our Analysis

There is a 64% chance that Donald Trump wrote this tweet himself.

This is tweet number 282 mentioning Russia from @realdonaldtrump -- 193 since inauguration. This is tweet number 735 mentioning Hillary Clinton from @realdonaldtrump -- 142 since inauguration. This is tweet number 78 mentioning the Washington Post from @realdonaldtrump -- 35 since inauguration. This is tweet number 66 mentioning Guns from @realdonaldtrump -- 15 since inauguration.

Word probabilities: 55/44 (Trump/Staff) Time probabilities: 9/90 (Trump/Staff) Metadata probabilities: 96/3 (Trump/Staff) Posted at: Wed Aug 1 11:56:31 2018 EDT [Link] Tweet Source: Twitter for iPhone

The most informative terms in this tweet were: getting (Trump, 8.9:1), hillary (Trump, 1.5:1), clinton (Other, 1.4:1), russians (Trump, 2.3:1), trump (Other, 1.2:1), met (Trump, 3.0:1), bad (Trump, 4.2:1), ? (Trump, 2.2:1)

A computer sees the following emotions in this tweet (NRC): {'fear': 3, 'anger': 3, 'surprise': 1, 'anticipation': 2, 'negative': 5, 'disgust': 4, 'sadness': 1}

Grade level of this tweet (Flesch-Kincaid): 6.1

“We already have a smoking gun about a campaign getting dirt on their opponent, it was Hillary Clinton. How is it OK for Hillary Clinton to proactively seek dirt from the Russians but the Trump campaign met at the Russians request and that is bad?” Marc Thiessen, Washington Post