#1st amendment

Synthetically extending feminism via engineered media campaigns until it turned into the domination and control of men by women, the exploitation of women through the female prioritization of formal employment over the sustainment of family and households via 4th wave feminism manufactured by psychologically engineered media, the exhaustion of these women through their exploitation via capitalistic employment via the holding of two directly conflicting beliefs involved in 4th wave feminism, and then containing it to politically left leaning women who tended to hold irrational fears such as hoplophobia (fear of firearms) and overall obsessive compulsive tendencies stemming from their desire to hold an irrational or unreasonable amount of power and control over others, was pretty genius though, and I guess it did technically allow for more men to be able to see what it’s like to be household caretakers and a caretaker of others, while also allowing for more women to be able to see what it was like to be directly exploited through capitalistic employment, but the people who desired men and women who can empathize with these naturally occurring binary gender roles likely could have collectively, assertively, and clearly asked for this and achieved the same or a similar outcome.

Instead, liberal feminists who perceived their society as dominated by men without empathy and compassion, and who then gaslit themselves into mirroring their false perception of men with personalities dominated by dark triad traits, ended up creating a society dominated by both men and women with personalities dominated by dark triad traits, instead of society being dominated by just men with dark triad trait dominated personalities. This was due to enough men in society responding to the masking of self-described liberal leaning feminists by subsequently masking as men with personalities dominated by dark triad traits, which then just caused more women to mask with personalities dominated by dark triad traits, and all in the misdirected effort to be loved and/or sexually accepted or desired by, and sexually compatible with, as many of the opposite gender as possible, originally through the means of the hijacking of the mate selection behavior centers of the brains of these people through the use of synthetically manufactured media.

So, enough liberal leaning females put on enough of an act that they pretended was real enough for it to significantly contribute to enough males then also putting on an act that they pretended was real, in an effort to increase their probability of being selected as a mate as much as possible, to the point of many of these people even voting for neoliberal Democrats when they otherwise wouldn’t have. This caused the society that this occurred within to then be somewhat accurately viewed as a society dominated by people acting as if their true personalities were dominated by dark triad traits, with this view being somewhat accurate since someone utilizing a fake personality more often than they utilize their real personality has the same effects on society as them having the actual personality that they’ve pretending to have.

But, some of the leftist leaning protesting that many of these dark triad personality masking females organized and partook in, because of most lower courts and at least some higher courts in the United States being dominated by misogynists that assumed women were too emotionally driven to work as lawyers and judges due to most of the women they were used to being around experiencing mania due to misogyny and men mistaking aspects of fairness and equality as purely emotional based, did cause some rather useful and innovative confrontational but non-violent protesting and other tactics to emerge and develop, and it also likely would have resulted in a noticeably worse outcome if even more emotionally imbalanced Americans had had firearms more readily accessible to them than before.

The USCG disqualified this tall ship from the July fourth flotilla for exercising first amendment rights. Need I say more.

Supreme Court decided National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n, 609 U. S. __ (2026), 6 - 3 today, 30jun26.

Ratified in 1791, the First Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” As relevant here, the Federal Election Campaign Act, known as FECA, limits a political party’s campaign spending. Those spending limits necessarily abridge political parties’ freedom of speech: Because “virtually every means of communicating ideas in today’s mass society requires the expenditure of money,” a “restriction on the amount of money a person or group can spend on political communication during a campaign necessarily reduces the quantity of expression by restricting the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached.” *** Applying the First Amendment, this Court has long ruled that a political party possesses a right to make unlimited independent expenditures during a campaign—that is, expenditures without coordinating with a candidate.*** But FECA still limits a political party’s coordinated expenditures.***

FECA restricts a political party’s coordinated expenditures—that is, a political party’s spending on campaign activities in coordination with candidates. 52 U. S. C. §30116(d).*** The First Amendment’s protection of free speech has its “fullest and most urgent application precisely to the conduct of campaigns for political office.” *** For nearly 200 years after the ratification of the First Amendment, parties could spend on campaigns in coordination with candidates. Parties and candidates could work cooperatively toward their common goal of advancing policies and winning elections to implement those policies. Again, no one suggests “that these elections were not functional or that they were marred by corruption.”*** Importantly, by holding FECA’s political-party coordinated-expenditure restrictions unconstitutional, the Court’s decision today treats all political parties equally. It will allow all political parties—including the DNC and RNC and the respective Senate and House campaign committees, as well as other parties and party committees—to participate more freely and compete more fully in the political process, and to coordinate more closely with their candidates. Whether the Democratic party, the Republican party, or other parties, all political parties and candidates going forward can compete equally under the same rules regarding coordinated expenditures and can structure their fundraising, spending, and political speech on a level playing field as they see fit within the law.***