According to Donougherâs footnotes, the flower the Bishop is mourning is not a real flower, but one Hugo made up. Here is her note on it: âA Hugolian invention: Les Guillons is a place on the way to Pontarlier, which here is combined with the name of a four-petalled plant of the Cruciferae family (â cruciferousâ meaning cross-bearing).â
Which, okay. You know how I talked about Hugoâs lack of subtlety? This is, like, the opposite of that while simultaneously somehow being unbelievably unsubtle. The plant is referring to the Bishopâs earlier idea that Valjean go to Pontarlier, while also being a reference to God, because crosses donât show up randomly if youâre Hugo, and itâs been crushed. So the Bishop is mourning Valjeanâs clear choice to reject this path and instead continue his path of violence and destruction. Super duper unsuble except that all of that is contained in a passing joke about flower names. Hugo probably thought he was being so very clever when he thought of it, and I canât even argue that he wasnât!
And itâs probably a pun and an in-joke with his friends too. (Actually, making up Symbolic binomials sounds exactly like something Hugo and his friends would do, nerds that they were. This isnât quite a binomial, but itâs close enough.)
Anyway, Madame Magloire continues to read as... not weird, because her reactions are definitely perfectly sensible given the everything, but slightly incongruous. Sheâs there as a foil to the Bishop, as a woman of the soil to contrast the Bishopâs lofty idealism. And from a narrative perspective sure, it works. They contrast nicely, her worldly concerns for things like his reputation and personal safety work to further highlight how much the Bishopâs lack of concern for those things stand out.
But, and Iâve been struggling for a while to put this into words, she doesnât ring true as a person in the situation sheâs in. She reads like someone who doesnât know the Bishop all that well, like a concerned townsperson or something. But we know that sheâs been with him for at least 9 years now, probably significantly longer. Magloire knows what heâs like. But she still tries to appeal to him as though heâs a normal person. âArenât you concerned for your personal safety?â she asks. No, heâs not. âWonât it upset you greatly to not eat off silver anymore?â No, not really. âWonât you put yourself first for once?â No, he wonât.
And I want to emphasize, her concerns are reasonable! Itâs entirely sensible to be worried about personal safety, or to want enough money to live, or to dislike being stolen from. In the âbeing a normal person with normal concernsâ sweepstakes, Magloire wins by a landslide.
But the Bishop isnât even playing that game. Thatâs his whole deal. So Magloireâs treating him, not as he is, but as she thinks he should be, tells me that theyâve spent a decade talking past each other. As much as the Bishop doesnât really care to understand why Magloire wants what she wants, Magloire equally doesnât really care to understand why the Bishop is how he is. âBut itâs for Monseigneur. Whatâs Monseigneur to eat with now?â is not the cry of someone who really gets what Myriel is doing and why.
And clearly they still enjoy each otherâs company, more or less. But thereâs a really deep disconnect that neither of them seems to have really tried to bridge. And you can see how they got there! The Bishopâs whole thing is bucking trends and expectations in the name of whatâs right. Heâs got leeway to do that, because heâs a man and a Bishop. Magloire, meanwhile, is a servant, whose entire social standing depends on her employer. She does not have the leeway to be eccentric, and clearly social approval matters to her. They are fundamentally at cross-purposes, and that would be fine except that the text never acknowledges that. Theyâre just presented as foils for the sake of being foils, and I find that unsatisfying.