TRE fans are not real 3.0 or Why I don't like TRE and its weird fans
Not me seeing Navier fan trying to shit on Rashta "because she's a horrible person" but defending their piss that immediately forgave a war criminal, closes her eyes on the slavery (though, as we later find out - she CAN do something about it) and murders of innocent people, befriends with the person who is responsible for children traffic. And, of course, forgives a person who was one of the reasons why her lover was almost SA... because Kaufman did it for her.
But, of course, the one who upholds the opressive system just because she's too priviliged to care, is a "better person". No, she's not, she's worse. Of course, a girl who JUST became an empress and without ANY support is MORE responsible for the slavery than a woman from noble society from the birth, who has dozens of the allies and who is FRIENDS with the priest who is trafficking people.
And, please, stop trying to make some strange assumptions to make your take sound better. There is only classism and Rashta is the opressed one. Stop trying to justify your hatred to an enslaved abused woman just because she's "SILVER-haired, BLUE-eyed (she has BLACK eyes) PALE-skinned girl that is meant to be a self-insert for isekai-fans", it's biased and weird. It's giving those people who are spreading hate to the women but add the word "white" to not receive backlash. Not to mention that the person admitted that they hated Rashta already, even before reading the novel, lmao. Do y'all even hear yourselves? "Yes, I hate a woman because she's the one you, isekai-fans, usually sympathise with! Navier?... Well, yes, she's white, too, and she's more priviliged and is pro-slavery, BUT..." Navier is NOT black, there is literally NO fucking correlation between Navier and black people. It's kinda odd to make the "it would be worse if Navier was black" assumptions, she's simply a Mary Sue who upholds on the slavery and is here to show that cheating is worse than the slavery. She's literally the definition of the white women in the South who blamed the slave for "seducing" their husband, if y'all want to talk about it so much. She was described like Rashta - "a beautiful white woman", her skin is even lighter than Rashta's, what are you even talking about? If we talk about the self-insert - Navier is literally THE self-insert for little insecure girls who want to play in the "power fantasy" and "be not like the other women, those stupid easy women because I'M NOT LIKE THE OTHERS AND ALL MEN LOVE ME". For someone, who is so "woke" and so "experienced in writing and reading", I fear you have better things to think about. For example, the racist portrayal of the POC in this shitass story.
If you drag Rashta for being the "isekai-self-insert trope" and she needed a tragedy because "this is what happens to such self-inserts", then I can do the same with Navier. Who is she? As I said, the Mary Sue for little girls to assosiate themselves with, the "power fantasy" that requires the misogyny, classism and pro-slavery ideas. The character that is meant to show "what a real girlboss feminist does unlike the patriarchy bootlickers" and fails miserably in the most pathetic way being very stupid, male-centred and hypocritical. Then, by your logic, she needs to die, too. If you can ignore Rashta's past to make the hatred to her more valid, I can also ignore all Navier's background and mental state, so your arguments about "people hate when a girlboss flips" don't work, too.
The "media literacy" tag is just sending me, OMG, this fandom is WORSE than The Boys fandom... If you want to make a "reverse" and retelling, then make a FANFIC or make a story inside the story (you know like reincarnation into the villainess' body and everything). Because in the vacuum, if the story is independent and on their own, with just their world - you don't have the power to say "erm, actually, Rashta is the Y/N, she's the isekai-self-insert!" BECAUSE THERE IS LITERALLY NONE OF IT. There is only ONE Y/N and it has piss blonde hair.
And not a Navier fan talking about the "Girl's Girl" thing when Navier is literally one of the worst female friends representations I've ever seen despite the author's desperate attempts to make her seem better. "She cares about Evalie" - yes, bro, and that's why she was smiling to her while covering up her chicken's war crimes? Knowing damn well that he hurt her? She didn't demand any apologies, nothing. "She cares about Lebetti, she gave her an estate" - when Lebetti said that Ergi backstabbed her father and brother - Navier didn't care at all, though, she knows that her dada is close friends with Ergi. It would be okay if Navier assumed that Ergi probably just make the truth come true (about all this shitass circus with Glorym's and Ian's blood) and tried to reassure her friend, but, no? She literally couldn't give a fuck. She knew that Lebetti would probably try to do something with Ergi (a "very dangerous person" according to Navier) and instead of trying to calm her down, she just thinks "well, I hope she wouldn't do that" to herself. I'm not saying that Navier should have left her man for those two but it's immensely hypocritical to hate Rashta for not being a "Girl's Girl" when your fav, despite ALL the plot and the narrative support, is just a bird-brained dumbass. She was literally doing the "I miss my cacao butter kisses" RIGHT after she found out Heinrey's plan. You know what's worse? Navier, before meeting Heinrey, already knew that he's a bad person who could backstab people. Heinrey was hiding his plan from Navier. And that bird, instead of demanding the answers, bashing Heinrey or at least just have an arc with the forgiveness, just says "omg, it was his DREAM! He will let go of his dream for me". If Navier hadn't a plot armor, it would be the dumbest decision I've seen - a bird trades her family's, friends', HER OWN safety for a murky man that she knows for 7~ months that was hiding it all from her. You know, it's weird that she thinks that Rashta is a "filthy sl#t" while glazing Heinrey before she met him because of the rumours about him being a cruel backstabber, killer and a womaniser. Not really "feminist", don't you think? For a woman who was meant to be shown as a "girlboss feminist that doesn't bootlick to patriarchy and men" in comparison to the girl who didn't have neither proper education nor normal childhood because of the system that she supports? She's not even fucking strong or smart enough, at least for my standards, but okay, I guess. I've just seen better.
And learn English, please. My English is not perfect, too, but my eyes were almost bleeding when I was reading that nonsense. For the post with the "writing" tag, it lacks the good writing, sorry.