:3
Cosimo Galluzzi

shark vs the universe

Andulka
trying on a metaphor
KIROKAZE
Peter Solarz
d e v o n

Product Placement
sheepfilms
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Not today Justin

η₯ζ₯ / Permanent Vacation
wallacepolsom


JBB: An Artblog!

JVL

pixel skylines
Keni

ellievsbear

Love Begins
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@solarpunk-nightbird
:3

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
*trying to pitch public transportation to Americans* itβs like a legal form of texting while driving
This comic is not about Plants
I wanted to make this comic after realising how my Mum and Iβs dynamic worked, and found a good way to describe how itβs made it hard to have a close relationship with her. I wanted to make this comic open to interpretation though, as Iβm sure others will have ways this connects to them personally.
acrylic on canvas 60*70 cm βlace over the riverβ 2022 #river #volkslovers #art #painting #sky skylovers
"In the 1960s, after his seminal work on barn owls, Roger Payne switched his attention to whales. In 1971, he published two historic papers. (...) The second showed that fin whalesβthe second-largest animals after blue whalesβmake extremely low-pitched calls that can be heard across entire oceans. It nearly destroyed Payneβs career.
That controversial paper was born of the Cold War. To listen for Soviet submarines, the U.S. Navy installed chains of underwater listening posts in the Pacific and Atlantic. This network, known as the Sound Surveillance System, or SOSUS, picked up a deluge of oceanic noises. Some were clearly biological. Others were more mysterious. One especially enigmatic sound was monotonous, repetitive, and low, with a frequency of 20 Hzβan octave below the lowest key on a standard piano. This hum was so loud that people doubted it could be coming from an animal. Did it have a military origin? Was it produced by underwater tectonic activity? Did it come from waves crashing on some distant shoreline? The actual source only became clear when Navy scientists started following the sounds to their sources, and often found a fin whale at the end.
Human hearing typically bottoms out at around 20 Hz. Below those frequencies, sounds are known as infrasound, and theyβre mostly inaudible to us unless theyβre very loud. Infrasounds can travel over incredibly long distances, especially in water. Knowing that fin whales also produce infrasound, Payne calculated, to his shock, that their calls could conceivably travel for 13,000 miles. No ocean is that wide. Together with oceanographer Douglas Webb, Payne published his calculations, speculating that the largest whales βmay be in tenuous acoustic contact throughout a relatively enormous volume of ocean.β The response was brutal. Leading whale researchers told him that his paper was pure fantasy. Colleagues hinted that critics had been questioning his mental health behind his back. βWhen you get to distances like that, people just refuse to believe that itβs true,β Payne tells me.
Payneβs work made a more positive impression on Chris Clark. A young acoustician and former choirboy, Clark was recruited by Roger and Katy Payne to be a sound technician on a 1972 trip to Argentina to study right whales. It was a thrilling and formative time. Camped on a beach beneath the Southern Cross, with penguins bumbling past and albatrosses wheeling overhead, Clark began listening to whales. He placed hydrophones in the water to eavesdrop on their songs and found ways of assigning specific recordings to individual whales. He went on to compile libraries of whale calls, recorded all over the world, from Argentina to the Arctic. And all the while, Payneβs idea of giant whales talking over oceans stuck with him.
In the 1990s, with the Cold War over and the threat of Soviet subs diminished, the Navy offered Clark and others a chance to observe real-time recordings from their SOSUS hydrophones. Amid the spectrogramsβvisual representations of the sounds that SOSUS picked upβClark saw the unmistakable signal of a singing blue whale. On his first day, Clark saw that more blue whale vocalizations had been recorded from a single SOSUS sensor than had been described before in the entire scientific literature. The ocean was awash with their calls, and those calls were coming in from enormous distances. Clark calculated that one individual was 1,500 miles from the sensor that recorded it. He could listen to whales singing in Ireland with a microphone situated off Bermuda. βI just thought: Roger was right,β he says. βIt is physically possible to detect a blue whale singing across an ocean basin.β (...)
Although blue and fin whale songs can traverse oceans, no one knows if the whales actually communicate at such ranges. Itβs possible that theyβre signaling to nearby individuals with very loud calls, which just happen to extend further afield. But Clark points out that they repeat the same notes, over and over again, and at very precise intervals. A singing whale will stop calling when it surfaces for air, and come back on the beat when it submerges. βThatβs not arbitrary,β he says. It reminds him of the redundant and repetitive signals that Martian rovers use to beam data back to Earth. If you wanted to design a signal that could be used to communicate across oceans, youβd come up with something similar to a blue whaleβs song.
Those songs might have other uses, too. Their notes can last for several seconds, with wavelengths as long as a football field. Clark once asked a Navy friend what he could do with such a call. βI could illuminate the ocean,β the friend replied. That is, he could map distant underwater landscapes, from submerged mountains to the seafloor itself, by processing the echoes returning from the far-reaching infrasounds. Geophysicists can certainly use fin whale songs to map the density of the ocean crust. But can the whales do so?
Clark sees evidence in their movements. Through SOSUS, he has seen blue whales emerging in polar waters between Iceland and Greenland and making a beelineβa whaleline?βfor tropical Bermuda, singing all the way. He has seen whales slaloming between underwater mountain ranges, zigging and zagging between landmarks hundreds of miles apart. βWhen you watch these animals move, itβs as if they have an acoustic map of the oceans,β he says. He also suspects that the animals can build up such maps over their long lives, accruing sound-based memories that lurk in their mindβs ear. After all, Clark recalls veteran sonar specialists telling him that different parts of the sea had their own distinctive sounds. βThey said: If you put a pair of headphones on me, I can tell you if Iβm near Labrador or off the Bay of Biscay,β says Clark. βI thought that if a human being could do this in 30 years, what could an animal do with 10 million years?β
The scale of a whaleβs hearing is hard to grapple with. Thereβs the spatial vastness, of course, but also an expanse of time. Underwater, sound waves take just under a minute to cover 50 miles. If a whale hears the song of another whale from a distance of 1,500 miles, itβs really listening back in time by about half an hour, like an astronomer gazing upon the ancient light of a distant star. If a whale is trying to sense a mountain 500 miles away, it has to somehow connect its own call with an echo that arrives 10 minutes later. That might seem preposterous, but consider that a blue whaleβs heart beats around 30 times a minute at the surface, and can slow to just 2 beats a minute on a dive. They surely operate on very different timescales than we do. If a zebra finch hears beauty in the milliseconds within a single note, perhaps a blue whale does the same over seconds and minutes. To imagine their lives, βyou have to stretch your thinking to completely different levels of dimension,β Clark tells me. He compares the experience to looking at the night sky through a toy telescope and then witnessing its full majesty through NASAβs spaceborne Hubble telescope. When he thinks about whales, the world feels bigger, stretching out in space and time.
Whales werenβt always big. They evolved from small, hoofed, deer-like animals that took to the water around 50 million years ago. Those ancestral creatures probably had vanilla mammalian hearing. But as they adapted for an aquatic life, one group of themβthe filter-feeding mysticetes, which include blues, fins, and humpbacksβshifted their hearing to low infrasonic frequencies. At the same time, their bodies ballooned into some of the largest Earth has ever seen. These changes are probably connected. The mysticetes achieved their huge size by evolving a unique style of feeding, which allows them to subsist upon tiny crustaceans called krill. Accelerating into a krill swarm, a blue whale expands its mouth to engulf a volume of water as large as its own body, swallowing half a million calories in one gulp. But this strategy comes at a cost. Krill arenβt evenly distributed across the oceans, so to sustain their large bodies, blue whales must migrate over long distances. The same giant proportions that force them to undergo these long journeys also equip them with the means to do soβthe ability to make and hear sounds that are lower, louder, and more far-reaching than those of other animals.
Back in 1971, Roger Payne speculated that foraging whales could use these sounds to stay in touch over long distances. If they simply called when fed and stayed silent when hungry, they could collectively comb an ocean basin for food and home in on bountiful areas that lucky individuals have found. A whale pod, Payne suggested, might be a massively dispersed network of acoustically connected individuals, which seem to be swimming alone but are actually together."
- Ed Yong, An Immense World : How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us
this is beautiful
Never doubt that there is so, so much beauty and strangeness and infinite complexity in the world, so very much of which we are still to discover.
Here (and pictured blow) is a link to the book the above passage is from, which is by renowned and Pulitzer Prize-winning science journalist Ed Yong. And here's a link to the young readers version, for any young readers or people who know them!
How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us
It's so often that I read "this scientist observed something that so upended human understanding that everyone said they were crazy. 10+ years later, everyone finds out they were right all along"
Do these scientists get apologies? I always wondered this as a child. You never get told that. Do they? Did anyone apologise to the scientists saying that dinosaurs were warm blooded? Were fast-moving? Had feathers? Did anyone apologise to Roger Payne? Did he live to see himself proven right?
I'll apologise. I'm sorry that people were mean and were rude to you, Roger Payne. I'm sorry they did not listen to you. They were scared and they lashed out at you for speaking truths they were not ready to hear. That was wrong and we shouldn't do that to each other.
And we need to stop making the ocean so loud. Industry and the military make a lot of horribly loud noise all the time and it stresses out everyone that lives in the ocean. We don't even live there and we're being such rude neighbours! Think about if you wanted to live next door to people who put speakers in your house and played deafening volumes of just screeching PINGS and REVVING MOTORS all day and night with no rest! That's what the sea animals have to deal with, and many of them have such sensitive hearing!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Also some of the reason food in the United States sucks so much is because white people have been refusing to eat natural staple foods of the places they live on Turtle Island for the past 500 years tbqh
Like, avocados are only expensive if you don't have easy access to avocados
If I go to 40 miles west of my house, it's 8 avocados for $5
If I go 4 miles west of my house, it's 1 avocado for $5
If I go to the right neighbor's house, it's "please take our 20 extra avocados before they rot on the cement"
Most produce works this way
In 2019, if I wanted a meyer lemon, I either got it from the store for like $1 or got it from a neighbor for free
In 2019, if the average New Yorker wanted a meyer lemon, it cost them $8
I found this out because a bunch of New York food writers were complaining to a colleague that California cuisine is so snobby and expensive
Traditional staple foods of the land where I grew up include acorns, prickly pear (as in the cactus and its fruit), elderberry, laurel sumac
How often do white people eat any of those? Well, at least here, so rarely that I don't think I ever ate them until I was an adult, and if they're available at any grocery stores near me, I've only ever seen it in scented goods
If I wanted to buy any of those traditional regional staple foods now, I have no idea how I would acquire them besides "Oh I know this one street corner that still has the plant"
And I've lived here over 20 years
thursday..... and i bet you wish you were her
Baby platypus By: Unknown photographer From: Disney's Wonderful World of Knowledge 1971
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" was literally written by a person who believed in fairies btw (source)
Like don't get me wrong, he investigated the alleged proof of fairy very thoroughly before he came to believe in fairies!
But, yknow. When people hold up Sherlock Holmes, rationalism, or Western philosophy as some bar by which all can be measured,
You gotta remember Sherlock Holmes was written by a guy who believed in fairies
Similarly, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" (Shakespeare, Hamlet, full quote here) was written by a guy who grew up believing the sun orbited earth
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" was literally written by a person who believed in fairies btw (source)
Like don't get me wrong, he investigated the alleged proof of fairy very thoroughly before he came to believe in fairies!
But, yknow. When people hold up Sherlock Holmes, rationalism, or Western philosophy as some bar by which all can be measured,
You gotta remember Sherlock Holmes was written by a guy who believed in fairies

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Also some of the reason food in the United States sucks so much is because white people have been refusing to eat natural staple foods of the places they live on Turtle Island for the past 500 years tbqh
Like, avocados are only expensive if you don't have easy access to avocados
If I go to 40 miles west of my house, it's 8 avocados for $5
If I go 4 miles west of my house, it's 1 avocado for $5
If I go to the right neighbor's house, it's "please take our 20 extra avocados before they rot on the cement"
Most produce works this way
In 2019, if I wanted a meyer lemon, I either got it from the store for like $1 or got it from a neighbor for free
In 2019, if the average New Yorker wanted a meyer lemon, it cost them $8
I found this out because a bunch of New York food writers were complaining to a colleague that California cuisine is so snobby and expensive
Also some of the reason food in the United States sucks so much is because white people have been refusing to eat natural staple foods of the places they live on Turtle Island for the past 500 years tbqh
Like, avocados are only expensive if you don't have easy access to avocados
If I go to 40 miles west of my house, it's 8 avocados for $5
If I go 4 miles west of my house, it's 1 avocado for $5
If I go to the right neighbor's house, it's "please take our 20 extra avocados before they rot on the cement"
Most produce works this way
Also some of the reason food in the United States sucks so much is because white people have been refusing to eat natural staple foods of the places they live on Turtle Island for the past 500 years tbqh
Language stuff that might help explain some misunderstandings
or, fun linguistic fact!
In a lot of languages, the base form of a verb is just one word, e.g.:
Spanish: correr, tener French: courir, avoir Chinese: ζ» (zΔ«), θ· (pΗo)
In English, the base form of a verb is 2 words: to run
Actually, in English, verbs are very often 2 to 3 words. This is because, as the joke goes, English mugged three other languages in a back alley. (The alley is metaphorical - the mugging usually isn't, to be totally honest)
so, if English isn't your first language, you might look at "I run", "I am running", and "I ran", and think those all mean about the same thing
to some monolingual English speakers, they do all mean the same thing
to an English dictionary, all three of those are in completely different verb tenses with overlapping but distinct meanings
and each English dictionary has a different set of rules for what info it (a) accepts, and (b) displays for free online

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
e e cummings was literally right btw
I do not agree with veganism as a moral standard. If it is your personal moral stance, that is fine. If you think humans eating meat is inherently immoral, I donβt want to deal with you, youβre hopeless. Vegan ideology behaves more like a sect of evangelical Christianity than a dietary choice.
Veganism is better for the environment, but claiming that it's a morally superior choice ignores cultural and economic factors that make people eat animal products.
It is not inherently better for the environment. That is the thing. When you begin trying to explain that local, sustainably sourced animal protein is better for the environment than imported plant proteins that are farmed 3,500 miles away using slave labor, they start tuning you out. Down is better for the environment than polyester stuffing, leather is better for the environment than pleather. We should work on making animal agricultural practices more sustainable instead of trying to shame everyone into eating plant products that are also farmed unethically and unsustainably.
Ok so I actually did the math on the first statement (local animal protein is better for the environment than imported plant based proteins).
I will be making a comparison between animal derived proteins (beef, poultry, and eggs) and plant based proteins (tofu and pulses)
First, I looked up the CO2-equivalents (CO2e)* emitted by producing 1kg of each protein source (Source), which yields the following results:
Beef: 498.9 kg CO2e
Poultry: 57 kg CO2e
Eggs: 42.1 kg CO2e
Tofu: 19.8 kg CO2e
Pulses: 8.4 kg CO2e
So we can see that plant-based proteins emit fewer greenhouse gasses than animal derived proteins.
Next, I looked at how transportation affects these numbers. I made the assumption that (1) no transportation is needed for the animal proteins and (2) the plant proteins are shipped from the other side of the world (so 20.000km). Shipping a kg of protein by freight ship at this distance emits about 0.6kg of CO2 equivalents (source)**.
So adding it up yields the following numbers***:
Beef: 498.9 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 498,9 kg CO2e Poultry: 57 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 57 kg CO2e Eggs: 42.1 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 42.1 kg CO2e Tofu: 19.8 kg CO2e + 0.6 kg CO2e from shipping = 20.4 kg CO2e Pulses: 8.4 kg CO2e + 0.6 kg CO2e from shipping = 9 kg CO2e
So even if we produce animal proteins locally and we ship all of our plant-based proteins halfway across the world, plant proteins are still far more environmentally friendly than animal proteins.
In other words, we can produce 55kg of pulse proteins, ship them 20.000km away and have the same environmental impact as producing 1kg of beef locally.
This is not even accounting for land use, water use, nitrate pollution, phosphate pollution etc., all of which have very real environmental impacts, and all of which are more present in the production of animal proteins****.
Factory farming is worse for the environment than what the farm actually produces. Also, there's always going to be some people that eat meat just like there's always going to be some people that never do. Both of these choices are morally neutral, because food is food and we do not get to tell people what to eat, because bodily autonomy is a human right.
This is not a problem math can or should solve, because math is unfortunately something that can only solve problems that have a single correct solution. And real life problems that involve living beings are not those types of problems.
Industry emits more CO2 than any living being. The plastic and rayon plants, the oil refineries, the mines, the data centers--they all are the main CO2 problem. Factory farms are the main animal welfare and groundwater/soil toxicity problem. Blaming this on people not being vegan is ridiculous. This is a problem created by industry and cannot be solved even if everyone in the world COULD get their protein from plants--and at least one person on this earth can't, because I can't. But I'm sure I'm not the only one.
There are several places where animals are overpopulous--some of them are invasive, some are not--and hunting them down and eating them is a very good solution. We have feral hogs where I am. We also have a native species of deer that is overpopulating. Humans stepping in and hunting them down and eating them so as not to waste the meat is a good solution here. In places that have a long tradition of NOT eating meat, eating meat isn't something anybody is saying they should do.
It IS however a fact that we are omnivores as a species. Some humans not being omnivores is not proof our species isn't. You have canine teeth. You have a gut that is arranged in a particular way. These are facts of our species. That we have the freedom of choice and adaptability to survive by genetically engineering plants to produce more protein and eating them instead does not erase that when looking us up as a species of animal, we are among the omnivores.
There is no one size fits all kind of answer. And vegans asserting there is and then doing a bunch of math about CO2 emissions like that proves it is not just doubling down, it's actively deciding to play into the oil executives who found out that oil was destroying the earth in the 1970s and spent millions of dollars in marketing the idea of a Carbon Footprint and guilt-tripping individual people into thinking THEY were responsible. No. It's the oil companies. It's the industrial factories and plants that are doing the bulk of the polluting. Nothing any individual person decides to eat or not eat is going to make more than a drop in the ocean's worth of difference.
Shut the factories down.
But don't lecture people on what food is and isn't moral to eat, especially if the only thing you're thinking about is CO2 emmission. What about the human cost of plants? What about the human agricultural workers? Quinoa getting popular fucked up Indigenous people who relied on quinoa as a staple and now they can't afford it. How is that less terrible than the CO2 emmissions of a single cow? What's the cost of suffering? Or does that not matter because you can't make a number out of it? Who is the "we" in "we can produce... pulses"? They don't produce themselves! There are humans out there picking them, weeding them, and those humans have a CO2 emission and take up resources the same as any other animal. But THOSE numbers aren't available, not like the handy numbers of a cow. Doesn't mean they aren't there!
Eating only plants are not some shortcut to being morally pure, that's what I'm saying. ALL food production involves something deeply exploitative and unethical in this age of factory farming and global exploitative economy and so forth. Vegans are not magically exempt from having blood on their hands just because the blood is human only and most agriculture statistics ignore the human cost of a crop.
You cannot diet your way into moral purity and it's folly to equate diet with morality anyway. That's not how morality works. It's messy and complicated and personal. It's not a math problem.