Untitled

There are currently 3,797,670,327 women in the world. A fifth of that would be 759,534,065 women who you claim would be raped in their lifetime. I'm no genius but I find that to be a bit too high to be true without evidence to back it up.

I think it's because they have addressed what makes them lose their composure is why some women constitute as "crazy" or "overreactive". Sometimes it's reasonable to be upset (even if it is still plausible some are blowing it a bit out of proportion) but not all the time.

Yeah, no. Women are not the perfect angels you're trying to make them out to be. If someone is bisexual, what we're not going to do is denote them by saying "awe sweetie you're just confused, women are the only viable choice :D". They get enough of that "you're confused" and "it's just a phase" stuff as it is. You can't force feed someone your ideology. Not to mention women can be worse in just as many aspects as men can be bad in so I wouldn't just go around spreading this message as if it actually makes complete sense.

So do you always contradict yourself or? Because you said "any other person not on the binary spectrum, is biologically male" and the binary system is male and female, so nonbinary women are men literally in your own words so they're trash by logic, correct? Because the pronoun "non" means not and we know binary refers to the spectrum so nonbinary is not on the spectrum meaning nonbinary women are apparently biologically men and are, in your own words, "scum". Everyone is valid. You may hate those specific types of people for whatever reaso but it doesn't invalidate them. Heck, you contradict yourself on who is and is not trash and a man so what makes you think your clear bias is right?

Well for one I'd need the basis of what you define as "trash". Everyone who has attempted to debunk you made the mistake of not asking the set conditioning for what 'trash' meant, most likely because it sounds pretty straight-forward, but it's easy for you to just change and mold how YOU would define trash in the context you're using it. Another point is, I can just as easily say Women have done just as many bad things as men have and then some. Also, you'd have to prove men ARE trash before anyone could actually debunk you, otherwise they could just say "this guy did this good deed" and you'd have to concede to their point because you never proved a point to begin with. You just insulted them with the remark "asshole" and asked them to prove you wrong.

Sounds like a very flawed system of thinking, but hey at least you're right about... Something? I guess that's the take away from this.

Don't know about anyone else but I certainly can. I mean with how most men are brought up, women are life. Everything they do should be for the well being of themself and should be for twice so for whatever women are in their life. Great Grandma, Great Aunt, Mom, Sister, Cousins, etc. If you can't keep the women in your family happy then you aren't doing your part in life or society and you're essentially not as good as you could be. I could say women treat men fairly okay and men treat women decently, but I can most certainly say if I had to pick which is treated better by the opposite side, I'd pick men, nothing to do with me being a boy or anything of that nature. It just comes from pure observations of the world around me. Even complete strangers I've observed in and not in relationships, I see men generally being much more courteous to women. Do they have deeper intentions? No idea I don't have any form of mind reading, but usually there is no follow-up to what they do and if there is it's just a short conversation that goes no where beyond chit chat to pass a good 5 minutes or so.

‘‘we need to tell men it’s okay to cry and show their feelings’‘ LMAOOOOO we need to tell men to stop killing and raping and beating women and watching porn holy shit y’all can fuck off with that ~male positivity~ bullshit, men are the OPRESSOR class in patriarchy we don’t need to hold their hands and coddle them like this

Women kill men. Women kill women. Women rape men. Women rape women. Women beat men. Women beat women. Literally everything you just said can be applied to women, it wouldn't make it anymore right, and it'd still hold plenty of merit as an actual counter arguement. Why don't we stop saying women are 'quirky' when they talk about being bipolar like it's something cute? Or why don't we stop women from abusing their husbands since they have a far superior domestic violence rate than men? Why not tell women to stop going crazy when things don't go their way? Probably because that generalization is presumptuous and gratuitous. Not every man kills a woman. Not every woman kills a man. Not every man beats a woman. Not every woman beats a man. Not every man rapes a woman. Not every woman rapes a man. It's pretty easy to argue women can be just as oppressive as you claim all men to be. No one is holding any man's hand or coddling any man. It is just simple positivity. It's better to be positive than allow negativity to run around freely. If that's so bad then I don't know what else to tell other than to each their own. You want to be a negative spiteful sack of potatoes trying to heckle on others trying to spread kind words around, go ahead, but do so with caution as those who wish bad things upon others usually have it reflected toward themself at one point or another.

Just because they are white men doesn't give them a pass on the reprecussions of rape accusations. You are a prime example of such because you're trying to shame them based on ALLEGED sexual assualts. Now I'm not calling anyone who came forward a liar, but by the logic of some people like you it is "guilty until proven innocent" and that logic is very lopsided. If society were like that anyone could say anything about you even if they had no proof and all you had was your word being your bond and guess who'd win that one? Certainly not you. It is innocent until proven guilty to give people the benefit of the doubt so that everyone stands on equal ground before an overall decision has been made. Has anyone actually prosecuted Donald Trump? Has he had to go in to court for anyone accusing him of such horrible acts? No. I don't like him, I don't even care for him, but there are always reprecussions to false accusations of rape. Doesn't matter what position you recieve or how high in regards you are held, someone's going to hate you because of rape allegations against you, someone believes you're guilty, and someone will spread it out further until now you have your own hateful fan club. Until either of them are in court, it's all just allegations. Being cautious with something as touchy as rape and sexual assault is the best way to handle it for the most part.

Boy oh boy I’ve got myself a real lummox on my hand. First off all of your statistics are false and come straight out of your imagination. 99 out of 100 rapists aren’t men you sad sad fool. In a study done in 2014 to 2017 it said that 79% of men were “made to penetrate” someone through coercion or forceful nature, making it sexual assualt or rape, and most of those men reported that it was a female, meaning a minority group said it was another man that forced them to penetrate someone they didn’t want to. So already there are a lot of female rapists. In that same study, 35% of male victims who suffered sexual assualt, they all said they had one or more female perpetrators, so that’s a lot of women. 35% isn’t that much compared to the other 65% but from your statistics, I can already tell you made up figures in your head and did 0 research because there is no way you come to any of those conclusions, but lets continue with this lesson I’m going to give you. In this VERY SAME STUDY, 58% of men who experienced rape and 41% of women who experienced domestic violence or a violent attack against them had a female perpetrator. So that means 58% of women are violent towards men and only 42% of men are violent towards men and that 41% of women are violent against women and 59% of men are violent against women. So clearly both sides have high numbers but it is basically 50-50 for each side with women having a much higher rating than your “10%” that you pulled out of your world of make belief. The only thing that is true is the school shooter thing and even then only 99.6% of school shooters are males. The other 0.4% is done by females or males and females working together but at least that’s the closest you’ll get to an actual figure that holds merit. Moving on to sexual violence in prisons, studies have shown that female inmates get sexually attacked by other inmates more than male inmates do. Let that sink in. Female inmates that are only surrounded by other female inmates get sexually assualted and raped more than male inmates are. And in Juvenile detetion facilities, 9 out of 10 juveniles that report an incident with a staff member usually report a female staff member. And what’s more is that it turns out that sexual minorities (gay, bi, pan, etc.) are sexually victimized 2 to 3 times more than straight inmates. All of these facts coming from this one study. And the icing on that sexual minority cake is that lesbians and bisexual women go to jail more than straight women do. And in this same study women who self reported themselves for attempting to commit or committing rape was a large 48% in the age group of 18 to 19. Until YOU learn how to do actual research and not spout some garbage just to push your agenda, I suggest you don’t speak without knowing what you’re talking about. And about the “men murder women over rejection” thing. That’s only in the extreme conditions that some guy doesn’t take no for an answer. So i suggest, 1. Stop using extremes that are based on your on mental math to make an arguement, 2. Actually do research, and 3. Don’t blame men for everything. Because you’re incorrect on all accounts.

I'm not defending rapists. Why would I defend them? The only thing I am doing is defending men from your unjust generalizations. I don't have to make things up unlike yourself. You say you "cited your sources" yet there is nothing there that even suggests you have one source. Not to mention your radically disproportional numbers. I'm not projecting anything. I can relate, but I know better than to project my personal feelings in an arguement, you do not. If I were projecting I would have spoken about how I was molested by 5 in my age group, but did I? No, so obviously you don't know what projection is. I'm not being hypocritical about anything. I'll keep defending people from injustice and unjustified hate like yours til the day I die and unlike you, I can grab my source at anytime. So here have it. You want to look even more foolish than be my guest. I only care that people aren't led on by your false proof and that they don't buy into the crap that you spew. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/ There it is. The article I got all my information on with a study conducted in 2014 to 2017. I'm done, have a nice rest of your day. Or as nice as it can be with how negatively you view others because of your imaginary "sources".

Incorrect. Misandry is just the hate of men and misogyny is just the hate of women. Cut and dry, plain and simple. It isn't some "act of rebellion" because a woman doesn't "care about men" it's just straight up, unadulterated hate for men and the same goes for misogyny. Misogyny isn't men "constitutionally oppressing women" because they both have the same constitution to live under so i don't know what you're talking about. Misogyny is just the hate of women. Sometimes I wonder if anyone actually reads over their things to see if actually makes sense. So busy trying to sound profound, meanwhile they are just disregarding actual facts.

I only hate men who have no empathy for women and it’s absolutely not my fault it’s all of them

Lets see here. Empathy, empathy, empathy. AH here it is: Empathy - The ability to understand and share feelings of another. Well for one you're absolutely incorrect. Men can go through things that women have issues with and vice versa. Do you know every man? Are you omniscient? No. So stop acting like you are and realize how ignorant you sound. Until you know every man, you have no right to generalize to this degree. Whatever a man can go through, a woman can too, and vice versa so don't say "all men can't empathize with women" because that is one of the most moronic things I've heard.

Well seeing how you're a human and not an omniscient being that knows every trans person, your hate of EVERY trans person is unjustified. Your hate towards trans people who you've seen or know that are like that is justified, but you don't know everybody so don't act like you do. The best thing I can say here is that at least you'll admit you hate them rather spout nonsensical numbers and such. If identifying as the other gender or sex makes them happy than more power to them. Just like whatever makes you happy is more power to yourself, but who are you to hold final judgement on people? You aren't. So relax. I don't care if you hate them, I care about your presumptuous assumptions that you think gives you the right to generalize all trans people. Which is a big N and O. Hate them if you want to, but don't generalize them because not everyone is the same person.

Boy oh boy I've got myself a real lummox on my hand. First off all of your statistics are false and come straight out of your imagination. 99 out of 100 rapists aren't men you sad sad fool. In a study done in 2014 to 2017 it said that 79% of men were "made to penetrate" someone through coercion or forceful nature, making it sexual assualt or rape, and most of those men reported that it was a female, meaning a minority group said it was another man that forced them to penetrate someone they didn't want to. So already there are a lot of female rapists. In that same study, 35% of male victims who suffered sexual assualt, they all said they had one or more female perpetrators, so that's a lot of women. 35% isn't that much compared to the other 65% but from your statistics, I can already tell you made up figures in your head and did 0 research because there is no way you come to any of those conclusions, but lets continue with this lesson I'm going to give you. In this VERY SAME STUDY, 58% of men who experienced rape and 41% of women who experienced domestic violence or a violent attack against them had a female perpetrator. So that means 58% of women are violent towards men and only 42% of men are violent towards men and that 41% of women are violent against women and 59% of men are violent against women. So clearly both sides have high numbers but it is basically 50-50 for each side with women having a much higher rating than your "10%" that you pulled out of your world of make belief. The only thing that is true is the school shooter thing and even then only 99.6% of school shooters are males. The other 0.4% is done by females or males and females working together but at least that's the closest you'll get to an actual figure that holds merit. Moving on to sexual violence in prisons, studies have shown that female inmates get sexually attacked by other inmates more than male inmates do. Let that sink in. Female inmates that are only surrounded by other female inmates get sexually assualted and raped more than male inmates are. And in Juvenile detetion facilities, 9 out of 10 juveniles that report an incident with a staff member usually report a female staff member. And what's more is that it turns out that sexual minorities (gay, bi, pan, etc.) are sexually victimized 2 to 3 times more than straight inmates. All of these facts coming from this one study. And the icing on that sexual minority cake is that lesbians and bisexual women go to jail more than straight women do. And in this same study women who self reported themselves for attempting to commit or committing rape was a large 48% in the age group of 18 to 19. Until YOU learn how to do actual research and not spout some garbage just to push your agenda, I suggest you don't speak without knowing what you're talking about. And about the "men murder women over rejection" thing. That's only in the extreme conditions that some guy doesn't take no for an answer. So i suggest, 1. Stop using extremes that are based on your on mental math to make an arguement, 2. Actually do research, and 3. Don't blame men for everything. Because you're incorrect on all accounts.

Then I guess it’s safe to assume all of women’s problems are caused by women.

No because that’s not true

Then it’s safe to say not all of men’s problems aren’t caused by men.

No, that’s not how this works. You’re really dumb as fuck.

If I were to thrust all of my problems onto my parents is that fair? No. Your issues are not completely caused by your gender. Clearly you don’t know what your talking about. If all of men’s problems are caused men alone, then all of women’s problems are caused by women alone. It is either that or you are saying men are the cause of every problem and that in and of itself is a completely fallacious statement. Problems are caused by many things, and not everyone’s problems are caused solely by the people they share a gender with. So I suggest you actually know what you’re talking about before you come at someone sideways for not agreeing with your point of view, even if your point of view is one of the more vacuous and malign type of opinions, you don’t see me throwing profanities around and calling you dense just because I can’t prove my point. That’s the difference, I can prove my point, where as you can not. You resort to swearing simply because you lack an actual arguement. I know what I’m talking about. Women can cause men problems and men can cause women problems and things outside of their gender such as race, religion, ideology, personality etc. can cause them problems.

Men were the only ones with power to shape society for the longest. Men created all the standards for men and women. Men fucked up and now they wanna blame feminists for it. Men are the reason for 99% of all societal problems.

That is also a fallacious statement. Clearly anyone could have reshaped society because if they couldn't then protests of any form would not have been tolerated. There would have been no March on Washington, there would not have been no Women's March, etc. If they had complete totalitarian rule over shaping society then things would be very different. The only thing people blame feminist for are being 3 key things: Intolerable, Unjust, and Asymmetrical with their standards. Men had a large hand in shaping society, but Women had a prominent role in doing so too. Whatever arguements that may have worked 10 years ago, no longer do now. Women got what they wanted whenever they took a stand for it. Want to vote? They got it. Want equal pay? Equal Pay Act of 1963. They got what they deserved from the beginning. I won't deny that they had no hardships, but I will deny that societal standards and issues that befall men and women are 99% on men. Where did you even get that number from? Foolishness like this is exactly why I'm barely taking this all that seriously. Women had their fair share of shaping society just like men did because this is a SOCIETY. it's filled with men AND women. There is no way that all of the blame can be thrust upon men. Women shaped just as easily as men could. End of discussion. Plain and simple. Both genders had their hand in shaping society just like all races had their hand in shaping society. So you can sit there on the highest column believing you know what you're talking about and I can stay where I am, below the earth and using actual logic and not trying to disregard history.

Boy I wonder how many years they received.