This is how it happened, right?
$LAYYYTER

pixel skylines

ellievsbear
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Monterey Bay Aquarium
NASA
art blog(derogatory)
KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
untitled

shark vs the universe
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

gracie abrams
Fai_Ryy
Noah Kahan
EXPECTATIONS
Mike Driver
d e v o n
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
seen from Iraq
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Kenya
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia
seen from Spain
@sirsparkiethegenerous
This is how it happened, right?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
he’s at Waffle House
If I had a tank of nothing but plants, would I have to cycle the water as often as one does if it has fish? Or can I get away with just topping it up and maintaining ph?
couple thoughts: 1. A No-Fish tank would not have to do water changes to get rid of nitrates, but you might have to add ammonia and play a really complicated game with artificial fertilizers because you don't have fish poop for your plants to eat. like land plants, aquatic plants need manure. 2. A tank with a SHITLOAD of plants and not that many fish may only need to have it's water changed 2 or 3 times per year because it's 1000% percent possible to zero out your nitrates with enough plants. I'm basically there with my 20 gallon long, I think I've only changed its water when I was dosing the tank with antibiotics. There are some people with walstad tanks they haven't changed the water in years, just topped it off.
3. I'm going to recommend reading up on the Walstad Method in general because it's really interesting and the principles there are applicable to all types of tanks, because it gives you a better understanding of how small freshwater ecosystems work. But walstad tanks have lights, maybe a heater, and no other tech, just a shitload of plants. They take a long, long time to cycle but once they do they're for-real no-tech tanks.
4. A tank without fish is not a tank without animals. healthy plants will have microfauna hitchikers like copepods, daphnia, snails, scuds etc. Those are all good and healthy and fascinating in their own right, and will have a (net positive) effect on your tank ecosystem, so you need to take them into account.
I guess my question here is what you're asking- Do you want to set up a tank with minimal water changes? Do you like tanks but don't want to get emotionally attached to fish? Are you just curious about the chemistry? Is there a plan here or just idle speculation?
dream tiger,,,,,, she has bewitched me,,,,,,
One thing I enjoy in Skyrim that there's not nearly enough of is the idea that ancient Nord culture was not what modern Nords imagine. There's Word walls honoring Redguards and Argonians, Tsun mentioning that ancient Nords actually valued magic, Olaf One-Eye being either a culture hero or a boogeyman depending entirely on who you ask. It's not much, but there is some sense that Nord revanchism is canonically misinformed and self-serving (like real life revisionist histories).
This is genuinely why I like the kinda wishy-washy ambiguous lore of TES as a canonical aspect of history being actively told rather than a strict linear 100% airtight type deal. As history unfolds and gets retold over and over and over things change, morals shift, meanings get translated or lost altogether as a result of attitudes changing over time. Even with dragonbreaks being a thing, the way TES lore adjusts from era to era (and game to game) is very much reminiscent of how the real worls interacts with and warps history.
It is a genius solution to have your game lore be told in-game, written down and propagandized and forgotten and changed... So many fewer retcons, when you can just point to the only account being 240 years old and clearly written by the victors
Add in the actual reality-warping powers of Daedra, dragons, gods and player characters, be they the Nerevarine or Hero of Kvatch or Dragonborn... It holds together better than it appears.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
as a lover of historical fiction and art about women and horny art and silly art i am so so into this premise. everyone can't stop being like "ohh his is dick made of wood too" it's magic dumbass. i am obsessed with how this sounds like an obscure medieval european folk tale. peter dinklage plays a basketmaker with the power to bring life to inanimate objects for an spinste's sexual pleasure. suspend your disbelief about his cock and have a little fun
and the leading lady is played by a woman whose gay man. perfect movie perhaps
for those who haven't seen the trailer.
#I assume his dick is ribbed for her pleasure and well-lacquered#like yes I assume the wicker guy who is ostentatiously 100% wicker everywhere we can see also has a wicker dick#I also assume a basket-making wizard who can make a whole-ass articulated dude out of wicker in one month#while *also* keeping up with his bill-paying day-job baskets#knows how to make a dick where none of the pokery is anywhere near the jiggery#sorry to everyone who's only seen shitty big-box store baskets that are made out of spite and neoliberalism#his dong is wicker and also perfectly fit for purpose#wicker? I hardly knew her! etc.
beautiful + true tags from @tyrannosaurus-trainwreck
You mentioned Batman being the first superhero from Gotham. However, isn't that a bit late? From what I can tell, Zatara was from the Gotham area (with a home not far from Arkham Asylum), the Original Black Canary had connections to Gotham (she may be related to a Gotham family of note), and even Plastic Man spent time in Gotham!
I did NOT say that the Batman was the first superhero in Gotham. I said that, by being the first Gotham superhero to take on a ward/sidekick in the modern day he is the root of the current expanded superhero roster that makes Gotham so famous. He did not invent superheroes in the city but most superheroes currently active within the city trace their origins, resources or iconography back to him. It was a necessary point to make because someone was asking me about WHY Gotham has so many superheroes even for such a large city. And Batman's long list of allies, partners and former proteges is the reason.
Because claiming Batman was the first superhero in Gotham City is the kind of major, yawning factual error that gets you hung, drawn and quartered in my line of work. Especially considering what my specialization is and where I work!
(Green Lantern Alan Scott, photographed soaring through a sleet blown Gotham night)
Gotham City, by nature of being one of America's major population centers was statistically likely to be one of the first places where the idea of masked mystery man took root. It was large, industrialized and financially centered meaning that it was struck hard by the double blow of prohibition and the great depression. As such the gangsters and other societal pressures it was under gave rise to many mystery men in the same way that other cities like New York, Metropolis or Keystone did. Although you're slightly off base on your examples.
Zatara was a native of San Francisco and most often operated around the general SoCal area. Plastic Man spent most of the war years living and working in Mammoth City, and the wartime Black Canary lived and worked in Park City. Though anyone FROM either city will tell you they are used to being confused for Gothamites considering both cities are ALSO in the same general New Jersey area and not far inland from Gotham's famous islands.
The most famous wartime hero from Gotham was and is, of course, "The Big Guy" himself. The Superman of his day and without a doubt the most widely known, inspiring and well trusted member of the Golden Age generation. Alan Scott, the original Green Lantern. During his time and with a large resurgence nowadays he was as much a part of Gotham's pride and DNA as the Bat Family is now. Gotham's criminal underworld fearing the blazing of green fire with the same terror they now reserve for the spreading of leather wings. Of course we also know in the modern day that Alan Scott was an employee of the Gotham based Apex Broadcasting Company where he worked various jobs until eventually becoming the station's director near the end of WWII.
In fact, in relation to the Gotham we know now it is widely believed in historian circles that the forced retirement of Alan Scott along with the rest of the Justice Society generation after their run in with the HUAC was what caused the mob violence and general criminal malaise that Gotham would become infamous for. In the year or so after the Green Lantern's disappearance there was a massive gang war, most likely prompted by the various mobs knowing that the Green Lantern was no longer on patrol over their heads. It was a bloodbath the likes of which called back to the depths of prohibition almost 30 years before and left the Falcones sitting nearly uncontested atop of a pile of corpses. A state of affairs that wouldn't change until near the modern day after the appearance of Batman began to pry Falcone's hands from their death grip around the city's heart.
Gotham City has always been a city of adventure. You just don't get that many...interesting people in one place without things starting to go a bit pear shaped. It just so happens that that nature, so intertwined with risk and violence, is also the perfect cauldron for heroes to be born and forged. Gotham City has been a prominent city in every generation of mystery men so far and I suspect from my own limited temporal perspective that that isn't going to change even as new generations rise.
Gotham always has to be at the center of the universe. Have you ever met somebody from there?
just had a really good mango it was so good that i had to illustrate how it made me feel afterwards.
op’s tags are so fucking important to me
this lab safety training module is sending me
I feel like whoever wrote these questions was speaking from experience

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
LAPTOP DEATH FILE PURGATORY IS OVER I HAVE MY CRAP BACK
Me and my girlfriend did a lil photo shoot in our regalia back in December
Oh we’re engaged now btw 💍
*inserting new RAM into my 10 year old motherboard* "Shhh... hey, hey! It's okay girl. I didn't mean to startle you. I know it's been a little while. I've got a nice little treat for you here, okay? It's going to help you run smoother. There now, see? That wasn't so bad. I'm sorry girl. I didn't realize how much stress I've been putting you under, streaming Elden Ring with only 8 GB of memory... No wonder you're having trouble with Baldur's Gate 3. You've been doing so good though. I know you'll probably have to go soon, but we still got a few good years left. Hopefully this will help ease any pain you've been feeling. I'm going to put the cover back on the case now, okay? I love you."
Girls are you okay?
I just don't feel like I can trust a monetised political blog to be entirely honest. Especially when you're talking about the oppression of others. It's in your financial best interest for that oppression to continue because it draws attention to your ad reads.
This is a very confident accusation built on a misunderstanding on how any of this is monetised.
This blog does not generate any ad revenue. Tumblr does not pay me for political writing and views on my videos here do not earn me anything. For the videos that can earn money based on views - Only TikTok, YouTube and Instagram count.
When I mark something as an Ad on Tumblr, that's me being transparent that a studio, publisher, or creator agency has sent me a key to play the game, or the video has the potential to earn money based on its performance elsewhere. I usually link those other platforms and explicitly say watching there is a way to support me financially.
Yes, some people support me voluntarily through Ko-Fi. Some subscribe to me on Twitch and I'm genuinely grateful for that support. But I also work full time - AyeforScotland is not my livelihood, and I'm certainly not making enough from it for political oppression to be some financial necessity.
Turning that into "It is in your financial best interest for that oppression to continue" is an extraordinary leap.
By this logic, journalists covering wars secretly want them to continue, foodbank workers want people to remain hungry, and climate campaigners are financially invested in the planet getting hotter.
I've been arguing for the same political outcomes since long before there was any earnings from being 'AyeforScotland'. My desired endpoint has always been the same: I would quite like the things I complain about to stop happening.
You're welcome to be sceptical of monetised creators. You should be but if you're going to accuse me of materially benefitting from oppression continuing, you'll need a lot more that "Some of your followers might also watch your gaming videos somewhere else."
Things a living weapon might not be very used to
Luxuries such as blankets
Extra bedding that's there for comfort, such as double pillows, soft ones or plushies
Warm baths/showers
Food that tastes good just because
Clothing in bright colors
Music
A door that locks from the inside
Clothing that favours comfort over functionality/protection
Pets
Floor time
Books
Pain medicine
Lazy days where you can just take it slow instead of being always at a strict and unforgiving schedule for maximum efficiency always
Hugs

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allie’s roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. “This night is for the straights,” Swindell’s character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). It’s also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, that’s not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They aren’t the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond “repeal” signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. That’s just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheep’s clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can y’all maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia
Goddamn. Okay
Did you have a kid in your neighborhood who always hid so good, nobody could find him? We did. After a while we would give up on him and go off, leaving him to rot wherever he was. Sooner or later he would show up, all mad because we didn't keep looking for him. And we would get mad back because he wasn't playing the game the way it was supposed to be played.
There's hiding and there's finding, we'd say. And he'd say it was hide-and-seek, not hide-and-give-UP, and we'd all yell about who made the rules and who cared about who, anyway, and how we wouldn't play with him anymore if he didn't get it straight and who needed him anyhow, and things like that. Hide-and-seek-and-yell. No matter what, though, the next time he would hide too good again. He's probably still hidden somewhere, for all I know.
As I write this, the neighborhood game goes on, and there is a kid under a pile of leaves in the yard just under my window. He has been there a long time now, and everybody else is found and they are about to give up on him over at the base. I considered going out to the base and telling them where he is hiding. And I thought about setting the leaves on fire to drive him out. Finally, I just yelled, "GET FOUND, KID!" out the window. And scared him so bad he probably wet his pants and started crying and ran home to tell his mother. It's real hard to know how to be helpful sometimes.
A man I know found out last year he had terminal cancer. He was a doctor. And knew about dying, and he didn't want to make his family and friends suffer through that with him. So he kept his secret. And died. Everybody said how brave he was to bear his suffering in silence and not tell everybody, and so on and so forth. But privately his family and friends said how angry they were that he didn't need them, didn't trust their strength. And it hurt that he didn't say good-bye.
He hid too well. Getting found would have kept him in the game. Hide-and-seek, grown-up style. Wanting to hide. Needing to be sought. Confused about being found. "I don't want anyone to know." "What will people think?" "I don't want to bother anyone."
Better than hide-and-seek, I like the game called Sardines. In Sardines the person who is It goes and hides, and everybody goes looking for him. When you find him, you get in with him and hide there with him. Pretty soon everybody is hiding together, all stacked in a small space like puppies in a pile. And pretty soon somebody giggles and somebody laughs and everybody gets found.
Medieval theologians even described God in hide-and-seek terms, calling him Deus Absconditus. But me, I think old God is a Sardine player. And will be found the same way everybody gets found in Sardines - by the sound of laughter of those heaped together at the end.
"Olly-olly-oxen-free." The kids out in the street are hollering the cry that says "Come on in, wherever you are. It's a new game." And so say I. To all those who have hid too good. Get found, kid! Olly-olly-oxen-free.
— Robert Fulghum, "All I Really Need To Know I Learned In Kindergarten"