Side blog for all my pent up rage about the current stagnation or even decline of women's rights/the rise of misogyny. I follow from my main account (crypto). If I haven't answered your ask yet it's bc I'm procrastinating.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Commited the mistake of venturing into the comments and I was hit consecutively with takes such as "Hitler was a zionist" (???) then "the USA was right to nuclear bomb Japan twice, they didnât wake one day wanting to be evil for no reason" written with incredible confidence like they were a specialist on the subject. Also added: "well it was better for the japanese population to die instantly of the bomb instead of dying slowly from starvation imposed by their leaders" which. Hum. I have no words.
<p>Abuse driven not just by misogyny, but by financial gain</p>
Council of Europe Strasbourg 11 June 2026
Women are being pushed from online spaces, harming democracy
The Council of Europe has launched a new recommendation aimed at strengthening accountability for technology-facilitated violence against women and girls, a rapidly growing form of abuse that increasingly threatens women's safety, dignity and participation in public life.
Technology-facilitated violence includes cyberstalking, online harassment, the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, privacy violations, misogynistic hate campaigns, threats and image manipulation. Such abuse often accompanies other forms of violence, including domestic violence, allowing perpetrators to extend surveillance, coercion and control through digital tools.
Europe comes together against online violence against women and girls
Many representatives of the Council of Europeâs 46 member countries attended the 10 June launch, which was held online and at the Council of Europeâs headquarters in Strasbourg. Featured speakers at the event praised the recommendation, adopted by the Committee of Ministers in March, for providing guidance to European countries on preventing and combating violence committed, assisted, aggravated or amplified through digital technologies. It also sets out measures to ensure that perpetrators, facilitators and, where appropriate, technology companies are held accountable.
Catherine Van De Heyning, Professor of European fundamental rights law at the University of Antwerp and Deputy Public Prosecutor in Antwerp's cybercrime division, described the recommendation as âa major step forward in ensuring that justice systems are equipped to respond effectively to technology-facilitated violence against women and girls.â
She highlighted emerging forms of abuse driven not only by misogyny or harassment, but also by financial gain, citing a recent case in which Belgian authorities arrested a Dutch national accused of operating Telegram groups that distributed and sold intimate images and personal information of women without their consent.
Online violence harming women in public life
The recommendation warns that technology-facilitated violence can lead to anxiety, depression, reputational harm, economic loss and withdrawal from online spaces. It also notes that women in public life are particularly affected, including journalists, politicians, human-rights defenders and womenâs rights activists, who are frequently targeted by coordinated online attacks intended to intimidate or silence them.
To address these challenges, the recommendation calls for stronger laws and policies, effective investigations and access to justice, improved support services for victims, enhanced international cooperation and greater responsibility for technology companies and online platforms. It also promotes prevention through education, digital literacy and awareness-raising.
Also participating in the launch, MarĂa RĂşn BjarnadĂłttir, head of legal at the Office of the national commissioner of the Icelandic police and a member of the Council of Europeâs GREVIO monitoring body (which deals with violence against women) stressed the need to strengthen law-enforcement capacity and to keep pace with rapidly evolving technologies such as digital forensic expertise.
The recommendation forms part of the Council of Europe's broader efforts to ensure that women and girls can participate fully, equally and safely in the digital environment and that technological innovation advances human rights rather than undermining them.
On 20 May 2026, Brazil adopted Presidential Decree No. 12,976, establishing a comprehensive framework to address violence against women onli
By Diego Bonomo, Jadzia Pierce, Gustavo Akkerman & Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses on June 11, 2026
Posted in International, Uncategorized
On 20 May 2026, Brazil adopted Presidential Decree No. 12,976, establishing a comprehensive framework to address violence against women online. Adopted alongside a parallel decree (No. 12,975) reforming intermediary liability, it reflects a more assertive approach to regulating online harms, including those driven or amplified by AI. Together, these measures will require companies to reassess internal processes to ensure rapid content removal and more proactive monitoring, including for AIâenabled services.
While framed as a genderâbased violence measure, the Decree reflects a broader shift in regulatory expectations from reactive moderation to proactive platform duties and systemic accountability. It also forms part of Brazilian President Luiz InĂĄcio Lula da Silvaâs administrationâs broader efforts, ongoing since 2023, to regulate social media in the absence of comprehensive legislation. This approach has already triggered constitutional and policy debate, including regarding the use of presidential decrees to impose substantive obligations and potential implications for freedom of expression.
A broad, technologyâaware definition of digital violence
A key feature of the Decree is its expansive definition of âviolence against women in the digital environment.â It goes beyond traditional offences such as harassment or threats to include conduct causing physical, psychological, political or economic harm, including where amplified by digital technologies.
The Decree expressly covers AIâgenerated or manipulated content, such as synthetic intimate images and AIâenabled harassment. This effectively integrates AIârelated harms into mainstream online safety rules rather than treating them separately. The framework is grounded in principles such as victim protection, privacy, and the prohibition of reâvictimisation.
From notice-and-action to structured platform duties
The Decree introduces a more structured regime for platforms hosting userâgenerated content. In particular, platforms must:
provide accessible reporting channels;
assess and respond to notifications promptly;
communicate decisions and reasoning to both notifier and user; and
direct users to appropriate support services.
Platforms may retain content where there is reasonable doubt as to its illegality, provided the decision is justified and communicated, preserving proportionality and procedural fairness.
These obligations should be read in light of a 2025 Brazilian Supreme Court decision that significantly limited the traditional âsafe harborâ under Article 19 of the Marco Civil da Internet. Under that regime, platforms were generally only liable for thirdâparty content if they failed to comply with a courtâordered takedown. The Courtâs decision departs from this approach, indicating that platforms may be required to remove unlawful content directly, including upon user notice, without prior judicial intervention, and introducing a broader âduty of careâ (dever de cuidado). While not expressly codified, the Decree clearly reflects and operationalizes this shift by embedding more structured notice-handling accountability requirements.
Systemic liability and designâlevel accountability
The Decree introduces a form of systemic liability, focusing on whether platforms implement adequate measures to prevent or limit harm at scale. The assessment shifts from individual moderation decisions to the effectiveness of systems, processes and safeguards.
Crucially, isolated incidents are unlikely to trigger liability on their own. Instead, the focus is on whether the platformâs systems, processes, and technical measures are sufficiently robust and effective.
Rapid removal obligations for intimate content
The Decree imposes particularly strict requirements for nonâconsensual intimate content. Platforms must:
remove the content within two hours of notification; and
ensure that the content is technically marked and blocked from re-upload across the service.
This combination of rapid response and forward-looking prevention is significant. It reflects an understanding that harm in the digital environment is not limited to initial publication, but is exacerbated by repeated dissemination. From an operational perspective, this may involve techniques such as automated detection, hashing technologies, and cross-platform content identification tools.
Proactive duties and coordinated harassment
Another important departure from traditional models is the introduction of proactive monitoring obligations. Platforms are required to identify indicators of coordinated harassment campaigns and to take proportionate measures to reduce the reach and visibility of harmful content. Notably, these obligations apply even in the absence of a complaint from the victim. Platforms are therefore expected to act ex officio where they detect patterns suggesting coordinated abuse.
The Decree places particular emphasis on protecting women with public exposure, such as journalists or political figures, reflecting concerns around the use of online harassment to silence participation in public life.
Targeted regulation of AI-generated harms
The Decree also addresses certain risks associated with AI-generated content. It prohibits the generation or modification of intimate content involving third parties without consent and requires platforms offering AI-based functionalities to implement technical and procedural safeguards to detect and block harmful outputs. These safeguards must be deployed in a manner proportionate to the scale and risk profile of the service.
These provisions are particularly noteworthy in light of ongoing global debates around deepfakes and generative AI misuse. They signal an expectation that platforms will not only moderate harmful outputs, but also actively design their systems to prevent such outputs from being generated in the first place.
Enforcement and broader policy approach
Enforcement of the Decree is entrusted to Brazilâs Data Protection Authority (ANPD), which reflects a broader trend toward regulatory consolidation with the ANPD increasingly positioned at the intersection of data protection, online safety, and, potentially, future AI governance. In parallel, the Decree provides for the development of a coordinated framework through which multiple public authorities would work together on prevention, protection, and victim support. It requires the Ministry of Justice and Public Security to establish an interministerial working group, which will be tasked with designing the structure and implementation of this framework.
Parallel reform of intermediary liability
The Decree was adopted alongside a separate measure (Decree No. 12,975) amending Brazilâs framework under the 2014 Civil Rights Framework for the Internet (Marco Civil da Internet), following the abovementioned 2025 Supreme Court decision that significantly limited the traditional courtâorderâbased safe harbor for online platforms.
While the previous regime largely conditioned liability on failure to comply with a judicial takedown order, the new framework introduces more structured due diligence and organizational obligations. It clarifies that liability may arise in cases of systemic failure to prevent or address certain categories of illegal content, including terrorism, child exploitation, hate speech and genderâbased violence.
Platforms must, in particular, appoint a local legal representative, maintain noticeâandâaction mechanisms, implement ongoing risk monitoring and mitigation measures, and increase transparency around content moderation, advertising and systemic risks.
Taken together, these developments point to a broader shift toward a proactive, riskâbased model of platform accountability, moving beyond purely reactive or courtâdriven enforcement. This approach shows clear parallels with developments in the EU, in particular under the Digital Services Act, which similarly emphasizes systemic risk management, transparency and proactive obligations for platforms, as well as ongoing discussions under the AI Act regarding AIâgenerated content and safetyâbyâdesign requirements.
*Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *
The Covington team continues to monitor developments in the area of digital services, content moderation and AIâdriven content closely and would be happy to assist companies in assessing the implications of this decree for their products, policies, and compliance strategies.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
a can of mace in your pocket (never in your bag, it's harder to just grab and use in an emergency situation)
if he's lying down, stomp on his ankle with full force
personal alarm device is a great addition, a sudden loud noise is confusing and distracting, while also alerting people around who might pay attention
same thing with a taser, the sound alone is intimidating as hell
don't carry a knife or other tools like this if you're not absolutely, completely 100% confident in your fighting skills with it - it's easy to take away, you can even accidentally drop it, and it could be used against you
comfortable shoes can go a long way - personal confrontation is a last resort situation. run for your life if you can
never tuck your thumb inside your fist - lay it over your fingers instead. you don't want to break it
if you have to, you can harden your fist by putting a matchbox inside - keys and other hard object are highly discourages. matchbox is easy to carry and can give your punch a stronger blow
your elbow hook is absolutely capable of breaking a nose
do literally anything it takes to get out of this situation. use what you can to your advantage. keys on a chain as a whip, pens, nails, teeth - anything. don't be afraid of taking action
once again - groin, eyes, neck, nose, stomach. they also have vulnerable spots, remember them and act, if it comes to it
Also: some things on our body are not that indestructibly attached. you can pull off someones ear almost completely bc its mostly held together by ligaments and cartilage, not bone. and its definitely possible to bite off someones tip of the nose, thats also just soft tissue and cartilage. not to mention lips are easily hitten through and you can absolutely break someones pinky by biting it with everything you got.
and especially for men, their balls are extremely vulnerable. grabbing a testicle and digging your nails into it while also rotating and then pulling as hard as you can WILL have him on the floor passed out or throwing up.
i 100% believe the biggest obstacle to effective and efficient self defense is people's hesitancy to really get close and personal with an attacker's body
Paris Mwendwa's "apology" video is so disturbing, it looks like she's being held at gunpoint. It reminds me of the video of that guy who stole a poster in North Korea, and was then forced to do a press release, while crying and telling the camera about how wrong he was, before being tortured and killed.
Surely this is a wakeup call for some people. That males are attacking this young woman to the point where she not only feels the need to make an apology video, but said video looks like she's being held hostage, as she cries and promises that she'll stop talking about herself, that she'll talk about males instead to appease them. This is horrifying to watch.
Lol it's the way the ask is worded for me. Like I'm supposed to feel bad that "blm and trans colors" don't look good on the rainbow flag. Much love to BLM, but I don't see why that would need to be on the gay pride flag. They are their own movement.
How come instead of just flying actual BLM and black power stuff alongside the rainbow, we just tossed a brown and black stripe over the rainbow? I'll put the raised fist next to my rainbow happily because, idk, maybe I'm able to value them without swallowing their movement into mine.
Why don't we give them real recognition instead of 2 stripes?
^I agree. Shoving everything into one flag (and by extension, one community) is lazy. It shows you have no absolutely respect for the different groups you're herding under one umbrella, and that you just want to look "woke".
None of you actually care. You just want to put up a flag and be done with it. You're lazy.
I wish you guys could see the gal on the right as a woman, too--because "woman" is just like the word "human." It's just what you are, not a set of regressive stereotypes, not makeup or clothing, not gender roles.
You don't have to stop being a woman to stop performing femininity (in fact, you can't really stop being one--not on a chromosomal level, not on the level of bone structure, nor even come close to true average male hormone levels without becoming severely sick, and not on a genital level. Aesthetic changes to the flesh under a surgical knife may ease dysphoria in some, but are not the same as truly replacing female genitalia with male genitalia.)
It reinforces that woman=femininity when your abandonment of femininity is coupled with your attempted abandonment of womanhood.
I'd be miserable if I thought I had to wear makeup and dress uncomfortably forever, too, which is why I don't. And yet, "woman," to me, is not lipstick and subservience--it's just the creature that I am, the animal, more ancient than gender, as natural as gazelles and dirt and trees.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
estĂŠn atentas a la situaciĂłn en colombia con el tema de la mutilaciĂłn genital femenina. estamos hablando de una prĂĄctica que estĂĄ afectando niĂąas menores a 5 aĂąos. ya basta de esta barbaridad y de mirar al otro lado.
in english: FGM is about to be outlawed in colombia. i'll keep you updated after june 18th or hopefully sooner.
UPDATE: FGM IS NOW BANNED IN COLOMBIA. GREAT JOB AND CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERY FEMINIST AND ACTIVIST GROUP WHO HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR YEARS đĽšđ
Also why is it that sex that isnât wildly misogynistic or otherwise sadistic and borderline/actually abusive is immediately referred to as âboringâ??? What does that say about you as a person?? What does that say about our society?? Also tmi but to be honest if things get too rough my body literally goes numb anyway. The lack of nuance in sensations is boring to me like the what fuck has porn done to people???? The definition of modern âexcitingâ sex is just beating someone and at least hinting at some sick parody of rape. Just because you have a boner doesnât mean itâs any less fucked up.
In the 1980s, when many women were graduating with professional degrees, anger against women crackled the airwaves [popular culture recast tender, intimate sex as boring]. We saw a stupendous upsurge in violent sexual imagery in which the abused was female ⌠In a world where both sexesâ guilt and angry fear surrounded the sense that women were getting out of control, the public quickly lost interest in ordinary unharmed nakedness. Presented as more compulsively engaging to the attention of men and, eventually, women, was imagery that played out anxieties from the sex war, reproducing the power inequality that recent social changes had questioned: male dominance, female submission. Female nakedness became inhuman, âperfectedâ beyond familiarity, freakishly like a sculpture in plastic, and often degraded or violated.
itâs something about the aggressively obvious 2020s makeup too on everyone in every movie no matter what the time period is. itâs the 19th century they do not have highlight!!!!
look at meg march in 1994 vs 2019. they both look great! however! emma watson is wearing very obvious lipstick, mascara, concealer under eyes heavy foundation etc etc. you can see this at a glance. i literally in making this comparison had to google if this was a promotional image that she took or actually a still from the movie because her makeup just looks like normal 2019 makeup that a girl from 2019 would wear!!! (not to mention her costume. different post.) then look at trini alvarado on the other left. obviously sheâs wearing tons of makeup because sheâs in a movie and she has tons of lights on her all the time but it doesnât look she is!! you can see circles under her eyes!! she doesnât have The Shine to her face that emma watson does. she looks so much more believable as a girl from the 1860s not because sheâs a perfect representation but simply because she does not Obviously Have On Modern Makeup
being white and making a black character the mouthpiece for your "these white hags are so MANNISH I thought they were just someone who can't pass. you know, one of us" comic...
wait, obvious racism aside, this little comic is a hilarious self-own. "I thought those hideous fucking hag bridgetroll chuddington women looked like USSS!!!! lmaooooo imagine literally looking like USSSS omg ewwww!!! they're so ugly that they literally look like USSSS before we got hormones and surgery to look 6.7% less ugly lmaooooo!!"
I wish all the âreligion is inherently badâ people who go on to describe issues exclusive to Christianity would understand that their idea of Christianity being analogous to all religion is a very glaring sign that they are still steeped in the Christian hegemony they seem to reject so vehemently
Religion is always based on falsehoods and thatâs why I oppose them. Are you seriously going to try to argue Christianity is the only religion based on falsehoods?
There literally exists a sub Reddit for ex memos every major religion including Ex Muslims, Ex Hindus, and yes even Ex Jews.
From reading their stories I found a lot of the things I detest about Christianity, (violence, misogyny, child abuse, controlling others, queerphobia, bigotry against non members, retaliation against ex members, ect) can be found in those religions.
While I agree many atheists make assumptions about other religions without verifying if itâs true thatâs not a valid argument against all atheists who criticize religions.
I'll confess to being what some atheists have dubbed the Righteous Victim Atheist. I'm not coming for any rituals or mythology that are not about subjugating oppressed groups, but I will 100% come for Tumblr Jewish men who try to persuade people-pleasing young culturally Christian leftist women and teenage girls that their calls for accountability for domestic abusers and rapists are indicative of toxic Christian beliefs about sin and punishment. Every religion has a misogyny problem, many religions have racism and classism problems, and it's all morally wrong.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Each time a cis woman speaks over trans men and says something like "oh thats just misogyny, not transandrophobia!" We should be allowed to hit her with a bat