Side blog for all my pent up rage about the current stagnation or even decline of women's rights/the rise of misogyny. I follow from my main account (crypto). If I haven't answered your ask yet it's bc I'm procrastinating.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Each time a cis woman speaks over trans men and says something like "oh thats just misogyny, not transandrophobia!" We should be allowed to hit her with a bat
Fighting to stop from men murdering women is ..... “against morality”.
Attempt to close We Will Stop Femicide on moral grounds criticised as a ‘grotesque’ and divisive step as election looms
Turkish public prosecutors have sparked outrage among feminists by demanding the closure of the country’s largest women’s rights group accusing it of being “against morality”.
We Will Stop Femicide (WWSF) has been issued with a letter demanding the group is dissolved on public security grounds and organisers now face a lengthy court battle to stay open. The prosecutors claim the group broke the law and acted with immorality by “disintegrating the family structure by ignoring the concept of the family under the guise of defending women’s rights”.
Fidan Ataselim, general secretary of WWSF, said: “We don’t see this as just an attack on us. For us, this is an attack on all women in Turkey, on all social movements, on the entire democratic public opinion.”
It was a grotesque action, said Emma Sinclair-Webb, Turkey director of Human Rights Watch. “It’s very provocative,” she said. “The authorities know perfectly well that this is a highly successful and very visible campaign.
“It’s grotesque to go after this group, it’s completely disproportionate – and what are you going after? Everyone knows it’s ridiculous.”
It is the latest salvo against civil society, already riled by president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s decision to withdraw Turkey from the Istanbul conventionon violence against
women last year. The move sparked large protests, many organised by WWSF, which brought a harsh police response.
Erdoğan and his Justice and Development party (AKP) have defended the decision, saying existing laws are enough to protect women. The move to shutter WWSF is regarded as an effort to marginalise feminist campaigners and divide them from more conservative women seen as more sympathetic to the government. A general election is expected this year, and Erdoğan faces growing opposition at the polls.
“They withdrew from the Istanbul convention, and society reacted very strongly. Now they are trying to polarise society. They are trying to marginalise our movement but they won’t be able to do it, because we are an organisation that draws its power from society,” said Ataselim.
“Ultimately, this is a divisive act intended to pit women against each other,” said Webb. “It’s sowing further social division going forth as a way to go into an election cycle as well – Erdoğan is pitting women against women in an attempt to shore up support of religious, pious, conservative women against these women who they can say are immoral,” she said. “They’re trying to make a culture war out of this.”
WWSF, with 750 active members, was founded in 2010 in response to the murder of a 17-year-old student by her partner. It has a nationwide network providing legal support to survivors of domestic violence, as well as collecting data on femicide, monitoring trials and organising rallies.
It comes amid a rise in femicides in Turkey. WWSF estimates that 416 women were killed because of their gender last year, and a further 72 murdered from January to March 2022.
Şükran Eroğlu, from the Istanbul Bar Association’s women’s rights centre, said she had anticipated the authorities’ attack on WWSF after changes to the law earlier this yearlimiting freedom of association. “We knew
that this would have consequences,” she said. “So this would definitely start with women’s associations, because the women’s movement is on the rise in Turkey.”
Gülsüm Kav, who founded WWSF, vowed to fight the closure.
“This is an attack on women’s right to life. So we will never give up our rights, our struggle. We will fight together with the public so that this unlawful step can be reversed,” she said.
Sign up for Her Stage to hear directly from incredible women in the developing world on the issues that matter to them, delivered to your inbox monthly:
there’s absolutely something to be said about ‘booktok’ books being largely wattpad quality written erotica i’m certainly not reading them however having seen a guy on tiktok make a video like ‘all the women in your life are READING PORN’ about a book he picked up and read in his FEMALE FRIEND’S HOUSE in a tone of scandalised horror and disgust i actually don’t think men should be making those criticisms. he said he picked it up expecting a romance and was horrified it was GOONER SHIT he said specifically like ‘who are you getting your pussy wet FOR??’ in a tone of revulsion. idk man im not sure shes the weird one. i kind of wish you were dead
"a lot of books that are successful on booktok are not very good" and "people can read what they want and we need to stop being so fucking weird about women enjoying erotica" are both correct statements
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I have access to several data bases from my university and it’s so funny every time you look up pornography theres not a single article about how it’s good. It’s 2020 we’ve been studying porn for decades, there’s thousands of studies on it, if you believe porn is scientifically beneficial youre dumber than a flat earther.
Wow what an insightful response you totally just debunked years of sociology research thank you tumblr user aguccimovie for your contribution to science
and if your rebuttal goes along the lines of "i know where the line goes for me, but i would never assume it on anybody else" that still plays into the same contradiction. you genuinely do not live in a vacuum, and any line you draw is going to have a ripple effect on the lives of people around you, especially when the cut off point perfectly aligns with the general expectations people already have.
"look, i know the stereotype is that men don't use mascara, but it just so happens that i also separately think that me stopping mascara use is a way for me to signify everyone else that i am a man, just, you know, personally, outside of the vacuum, and it has nothing to do with anyone else's decisions, although of course i know that this is how they also recognize the significance, because they are also raised in the same culture and are affected by the stereotype, but anyway, to each their own and this is just about me"
The left: men aren’t responsible for the oppression of women. You can’t blame an entire group of people for something
Also the left: actually the rise of open and violent racism and misogyny and homophobia in society is all women’s fault because they were kinda mean to men on the internet and some of them are even saying no to men. Poor baby victim men are being forced against their will to become trump loving conservatives by women, who are single handedly destroying the left and democracy.
Morons thinking gnc/tomboy/butch women who don't give the slightest fuck about female beauty standards must be closeted transmen is the same thing as religious morons thinking atheists must worship the devil or be mad at god.
about that "male firefighters actively sabotage equipment that female firefighters use"you said... were there documented cases or just something you personally noticed?
This isn’t the article I recalled, but an example anyway:
Morningstar was hired but given a 90-day probationary period; for men it was 30. Then the gear theft and tampering started. Her gloves, hoods, and radio vanished (2007); her mask was sabotaged (two weeks after 9/11). She found what appeared to be semen on her bed (2012). Clothes continued to be stolen and destroyed. Word of the harassment rose all the way to Mayor Don McIlroy, and the department issued a warning against equipment tampering, but nothing substantively changed.
Another:
Her concerns included having her firefighting gear tampered with several times
And another:
Ever since Judy Brewer became America’s first female firefighter 45 years ago, women have been hazed in the fire service, including sabotaged oxygen tanks and glass in their boots.
More:
You're living twenty-four hours a day in a firehouse and nobody will talk to you. Shit in your boots. Women at the front end of a fire hose and a fire scene and the water gets cut off from her.
I can’t even find the article I had in mind (it was around four or five years ago), but it looks I didn’t need to.
I love when MRAs are like "women make men do all the hard and dangerous jobs" while the women who do enter those fields have to put up with men trying to kill them
Female firefighters face bullying, sexual harassment, fifth estate finds
About 600 of Canada's 22,000 firefighters are women, and workplace issues can be hard to negotiate
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The answer “Anyone who identifies as one” to the question “What is a woman?” is so dumb. What is a vegan? Anyone who identifies as one. What is an engineer? Anyone who identifies as one. What does it mean to be disabled? It means to identify as disabled. Like what kinda logic is that 😭
no I'm reblogging this again because what the actual fuck?????? how is is possible to be sexually attracted to someone because they have the same "gender" as you? can someone define the woman and man gender? and why the fuck does that fall under homoSEXual. it's not homoGENDERual. if you are attracted to someone of the opposite sex but that same "gender", whatever that means, that still falls under heterosexual. ugh this just pissed me all the way off. we seriously can't have anything. so now under this definition, "female homosexual" doesn't even accurately describe us anymore. so if I'm a female exclusively attracted to other females, what word am I supposed to use? they've changed the definition of lesbian, sapphic, gay, and now even homosexual
David Sedaris’s opinion on the word queer, and a few dumbass fucking idiot comments.
one and only smart comment:
these people want to be able to claim "weirdness" and "avant-garde-ness" without having to actually define whether they are gay or straight or bisexual (probably because they're straight). but thanks for once again lumping same-sex-attraction in with weirdness and unconventional lifestyles when gay activists worked for literal decades to say "hey, we're just like you, we're normal people who just happen to like the same sex". it's funny how all these people all calling david sedaris old, and saying he just doesn't get it. well maybe you're young, and YOU just don't get it. you don't get how queer was and is used as a derogatory slur especially towards gay men, and specifically used to call homosexuality WEIRD and STRANGE, and so maybe david is confused why suddenly non-gay people are adopting the word to call themselves weird and strange for being kinky or having threesomes. YOUUUUU don't it, he gets it more than you, you gen-z spicy straight queer. "maybe I don't want to invoke exactly who I have sex with" okay then don't come out?? don't come out as queer then...? you want to come out at queer, but not tell anyone who you have sex with. good plan. so you want the social cool point and oppression points without actually coming out of the closet, sorry but you can't have both. if you don't want people questioning who you have sex with, maybe don't mention your queerness. that's like announcing that you're a very pious religious person, and then when people ask what religion you practice, you're like "I don't want to invoke exactly what religion I practice". then maybe don't bring it up?? and claiming that david "doesn't want to make space for anyone else"... yeah maybe he doesn't want to make room for spicy straight polyamorous kinksters to be lumped together with him as a homosexual man.... I think that's pretty fair! inclusivity is not always good and positive. exclusivity is not inherently mean, problematic or evil. we don't have to make space for everyone. you can tell most of these people are not actually homosexual or bisexual, otherwise they wouldn't have felt called out by what david said. whatever, have fun with your threeway, but leave gays and lesbians out of it please.
Queer people who tell everyone that they're queer but refuse to say anything else are like kids and teenagers when they're trying to be cool and mysterious, like the ones who pretended to be secretly mermaids when the tv show H20 was popular. It's cute when a 7 year old does it, but when it's an adult it's just embarrassing.
no literally it's like coyly admitting to your friends on the playground that you DO have a crush and then basking in all the attention and interest as the ask you to divulge who you have a crush on, and refusing to say. so you can keep the attention. it's very cringe. "I'm queer but.... I won't say how or why"
we female homosexuals owe EVERYTHING to the males who fought for our rights at stonewall 🥺🥺🥺🥺 forget about Storms DeLarverie, the lesbian that was actually at stonewall, and forget that someone fighting for rights you benefit from does not obligate you to support them forever in every endeavor and in every belief they hold. yeah, we owe males EVERYTHING you guys 🥺🥺🥺🥺🙏🙏🙏🙏thank you for my rights males!!!!!
Even if trans women had done everything at stonewall... why tf would that mean lesbians owe "everything" to them?? There is a world outside Stonewall, even for usa centric ppl it's just ONE event if its an important one...
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
gnc women and butch women have not “given up” and if you can’t tell the difference between a well dressed good looking butch and a straight girl having a bad day wearing sweats, idk how to help you girl
Straight girls don't wear sweats when they're having a bad day, they wear them all the time because they're comfortable. They're not a statement on one's sexuality except in the eyes of a lesbian.
Radfems want to create a world where appearances don't matter and where women can dress in any way they want and be as gender non-conforming as they please without harassment or accusations - accusations like "if you don't wear makeup you're giving up on yourself", or "masculinity in a woman is a sign of depression", or "being butch means you're a lesbian". These are the sort of accusations made by Conservatives who want women to conform... Conservatives and lesbians.
As the above exchange demonstrates, lesbians would ideally like to divide the world between feminine-looking straight women (who signal their heterosexuality by dressing in a gender-conforming way), and butch-looking lesbians who dress like men, in order to express their homosexuality.
So in a world where the lesbian perspective won straight women wouldn't be allowed to dress themselves in a gender non-conforming way, no matter how much they'd like to, no matter how much this was true to their authentic self - which btw they can! In our society women can in fact dress in any way they like. But in the ideal lesbian world straight women wouldn't be allowed to do that because lesbians would want the monopoly on butchness.
So the lesbian perspective is regressive and anti-feminist and enforces gender conformity.