There are wonderful large halls, but in general I think most music for solo piano is not meant for big halls.  It was meant to be played in a small hall, and sometimes in a very small space, indeed.  I have my own private theories that some music was not meant to be played for other people, even.  It was only meant for the player. Bachâs solo cello pieces, for example, like the Bach fugues, are meant really to be played and to be experienced by being played and to be listened to, but not to be performed. In some ways thereâs a certain amount of music that lets us experience it if itâs at its best and can be captured; thereâs almost no outward component of being presented at all, but you experience the music as you play it and people hear it, but itâs not a performance.
~~~
For me, piano playing rarely registers or radiates a joy of, âIsnât it marvelous to be playing the instrument?â  Itâs always more serious than that; thereâs always something else involved, which maybe is as it should beâŚ.Thereâs a certain joy of doing it, and it even enters into the music itself.  But far too often one does also hear people who are carried away by their own fluency and, âLove me, love my sound.â  That is really more of a problem in music-making â people who are not attentive enough to music, and hear only themselves in the mirror of the instrument.  But the other thing is really important, too.
I had a terrible time with Beethovenâs Piano Sonata No. 1 the first time I played it. Probably it was because as an angsty teen, I didnât find nearly enough Sturm und Drang in it; and because I had been indulged with late Beethoven sonatasâalong with a good deal of stuff from bona fide Romantic repertoireâbefore encountering it. I just couldnât be bothered. Not enough technical fireworks, not enough dramaâŚit bored me to tears. I didnât even think it sounded good.
I revisited it a few months back, when flipping through my volumes of Beethoven (and dreaming of another life when Iâll have enough talent and big enough hands to play the Hammerklavierâwell), and was surprised at the density of pencil markings and comments on the pages. All the stuff I justâŚrefused to do. And nowâŚI just donât know why.
Sure, itâs not as stylistically âtransgressiveâ or technically demanding as late Beethoven works, but Sonata No. 1 is actually beautiful. The way the Mannheim rocket dovetails with the sweet counterpoint in the exposition, and how the motif from that counterpoint is echoed in the development before being reworked in the recap (above*)âŚ. It asks to be played with care and conscientiousness and love. And perhaps above all, it asks to be listened to.
Among the comments on my busy-looking score is âelegantâ (my teacher didnât have the most inventive English, though recalling her words doesnât do justice to all she was able to convey). She was, wellâŚthe kind of person who would find âeleganceâ where others would not; but here, I think itâs fundamentally not about elegance. I think itâs about a certain chasteness, a certain purityâi.e., what I most admire in Bach. There is something prayerful in its seeming simplicity. Those meditative snippets juxtaposed with the fierier sections (which in Beethoven I always like to infuse with perhaps more bite than is justified)âthey are a window into how one might talk to God, when all alone.
IIRC, S once pooh-poohed Beethoven as being âmelodramaticâ. Even if I disagree, I can understand the sentiment (so I forgive you, S). But this is perhaps where the difference between early and late Beethoven comes in. I also messed around with Bachâs Violin Sonata No. 2 a few months ago, and after realizing that I actually hadnât heard it in years, dug out my reference, Szeryng. I was surprised and honestly a little affronted by the romanticism in the Andanteâthere was an overstated warmth, a lushness that seemed out of place. Certainly, it wasnât nearly as offensive as Hilary Hahnâs take, which had a richness that telegraphed, âI want to be playing Brahmsâ, and made me want to hurl. But Szeryngâs made me think of (a tasteful rendition of) the second movement of Beethovenâs PathĂŠtique.
Yes, thatâs a piece I sometimes pull out when Iâm emo (in private), and I think itâs not quite fair to Beethoven that it has become âclichĂŠd emo movie theme songââbut while I think many interpretations of it are overwrought, the sadness in it isnât exactly meant to be understated. It is a âthe tears flow; I let themâ sort of sadnessâcantabile at its heart; whereas in the Andante of Bachâs Sonata No. 2, the mournfulness is of a very quiet and collected and sober sort. It very much makes me think of a heartbeatâof a solitary walk in the forest (as Beethoven was purportedly wont to partake in, incidentally), where itâs quiet enough to hear your own heartbeat (and footsteps)âŚand where, in your sadness, that is all you want and need to hear. In it thereâs a clarity that is both humbling and uplifting. And we glimpse it in some early Beethoven, like Piano Sonata No. 1.
I havenât found any renditions of this piece that I love, aside from Richard Goodeâsâthe lyricism is there, without compromising the agitato undercurrent where itâs present. Iâve never performed it, but I think itâll be a piece I keep to myself, something I add to my collection of personal meditations.
*99% sure my score has staccatos in many of the places where that has staccatissimos. The latter looks excessive, but then again, Iâm inclined to play them thus, anyway.