I never expect that Cartoon Network airs "Mr. Bean: The Animated Series" during prime time in our country. I happened to see that because I don't like to watch TV drama anthology show and switched to watching cartoons instead.
hello vonnie
Jules of Nature

gracie abrams

bliss lane
almost home
Monterey Bay Aquarium
will byers stan first human second
Cosmic Funnies
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
$LAYYYTER
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Game of Thrones Daily
official daine visual archive
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin
Today's Document
seen from Ecuador
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Russia

seen from Portugal
seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from Bulgaria

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Belgium
@saimusage
I never expect that Cartoon Network airs "Mr. Bean: The Animated Series" during prime time in our country. I happened to see that because I don't like to watch TV drama anthology show and switched to watching cartoons instead.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A certain "Jane Eyre" fan I knew of shared an image of a page containing few promo photos of 1983 TV version from the abridged children's edition of the novel. This one is from the scene where Jane and Mr. Rochester riding on horse together. The scene was said included when the adaptation was initially aired on TV but it was cut in home video versions for some reason.
Something that I don’t like about modern analyses and discussions of older novels is when people ignore the EXTREME religious messaging. Like it’s fine if you don’t *agree* with it but ignoring it completely is actually not okay if you’re trying to do a comprehensive discussion/analysis/whatever on it.
My prime example here is Jane Eyre. CLASSIC Christ figures there. Love that novel. #favnovel
Mia Wasikowska (Jane) and Michael Fassbender (Mr. Rochester) in "Jane Eyre" 2011 version.
Cover art of official Criterion Collection release of Guillermo del Toro's "Frankenstein" 2025 movie version. Art drawn by Denver Balbaboco. The director personally handpicked said artist as a poster designer of the movie.
Source: News of releasing "Frankenstein" 2025 version on Criterion.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Watching some cartoons on Cartoon Network and having lunch alone for the day is great. I've been watching "The Amazing World of Gumball" for the past few days and I find it interesting. I never expected to like it.
I have watched "Wuthering Heights" 1939 version and it's fairly good. Obviously it romanticize the relationship between Cathy and Heathcliff but it didn't forget they're both unbearable. It has some creative liberties which is a mixed bag but it doesn't mess up the coherence of the story. It's entertaining to watch if you're interested in looking for "Wuthering Heights" adaptations.
Han Solo chasing some Stormtroopers by himself then backs out when he found out there are more of them on the other side is hilarious.
"Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope" is fun to watch.
Raww's human form is like some boy who hates to go to school and prefers to play basketball barefooted, swims in the flood and hangs out with some of his friends on the streets.
When I saw this scene from "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope" where Ben a.k.a Obi-Wan used a Jedi mind trick to one of the Stormtroopers to get into the city further, it reminds me of a game called "The Curse of Monkey Island" which I played several years ago. Guybrush Threepwood, the main character there has an option to do the same trick to the hotdog seller in order to get into the beach without using a membership card.
The movie and the game happens to be in Lucasfilms with the latter is in games division called Lucasfilm Games. It's not unusual that "Monkey Island" games has a lot of references from "Star Wars".

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I noticed that the monolith and the faceplate of HAL 9000 in "2001: A Space Odyssey" are both rectangle, mostly black and capable to give aid to anyone who uses them to progress their lives. The difference is that HAL is infallible and given ability to communicate. When it was shown to destroy lives, the humans who use it shut it off. On the other hand, the monolith was created by a certain mysterious alien race and it said it shows up in different galaxies. For some reason, the monolith managed to survive for at least few million years.
I admit the movie is confusing in some parts and left some questions which made me difficult to appreciate it as a whole. Then again, it made me ponder why those objects happen to be a same shape and similar function. If humans managed to shut off HAL, does that mean only the aliens who know about the monolith are capable to do the same if the latter becomes destructive? Is HAL having an ability to talk and refuse to follow its subject's orders are some of the reasons why it was taken down? Is the monolith not giving an ability to communicate and managed to show up randomly are part of the reason why it still exist?
The monolith suddenly shows up near the ending gave me creeps. It might have good intentions by helping a dying old man who turned out to be a lone astronaut who survived from HAL 9000's destruction but it feels unsettling it shows up out of nowhere. Why the monolith chose that astronaut? Does it want to save him as an apology for trapping him at a strange place for the rest of life? Are the aliens the ones who put that monolith there? Like I said I was confused but the movie is somehow still good.
It's a relief I never saw the scene from "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope" where the Death Star is used and how powerful it is before watching the movie. When I saw it for the first time, I was shocked.
I watched "Star Wars Episode IV - A New Hope" few days ago and it's fantastic. Even if the early parts of the movie is slow, it managed to be engaging and has some suprises in store. The characters are great in general. It's special effects are incredible too at that time. I'm glad I got a chance to see that movie.
I have watched the first "Godzilla" movie and it was fairly good. The part where the titular monster destroys Tokyo is the most memorable scene I saw there. It managed to be terrifying and it showed the abilities it has. The visuals were groundbreaking and suited how the situation in the scene is traumatic.
It's fascinating that "2001: A Space Odyssey" predicted the idea of watching shows on handheld gadgets as shown in the scene where two astronauts are eating meals and watching news on their tablets at the same time. It was probably inspired from TV dinner which was a trend around 1950s where people eat meals while watching TV. It was ahead of its time.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I don't deny the visuals of "2001: A Space Odyssey" are beautiful and ahead of its time but the pacing is chore to watch leading me to forget the story. I get the setting in space is slow and bleak but no way I have to watch some characters serving food, fixing stuff or using space pod for several minutes. Not to mention the symbolism is out of place in some parts and left more questions in the end. I have a hunch the movie seems meant to present the cinema's capability to present high definition graphics or to use it on TVs displayed on appliance stores only at that time. Apart from the "antagonist" HAL 9000 and the surviving astronaut, the rest of characters have little impact to get attached to them. It's certainly not a terrible film but it's not the best either in my opinion. I wish I would want to like it but I guess I'm not fit enough to understand what's going on there.
I watched "Project Hail Mary" and I was suprised it turned out to be fantastic. I expected it's a horror movie and has slow pacing judging from its runtime and some scenes shown early but it was a memorable experience in the end.
I can't believe the chemistry between a lone astronaut and a living space rock is nice. Glad to see that there are some movies like this turned out to be enjoyable.