☆ they/it/he pronouns + hym/hymn/void/angel/love/rat -> more pronouns here
☆ I'm transmasc, polyamorous, and mainly unlabeled! Refer to this post for more
☆ DID sys, narcissist, hypersexual, and some things that are still being figured out with my therapist. None of your business tho
☆ endogenics, willogenics, polyminds, transplural anything of the sort, fuck off <3
☆ I'm extremely uncomfortable with being asked who is fronting (unless you are a friend of mine)!
☆ silly stuff, mean stuff, horny stuff, just a little bit of everything. be aware
☆ I TAG MY HORNY STUFF!!!! If you don't wanna see it block the tag " not so saint gore "
☆ angelkin, ratkin, and some fictives in the sys
☆ anons are turned off for my own comfort. Don't be a pussy and send hate with your bright happy face. If you want to be anonymous, ask!
☆ i call my mutuals "smoothie"
☆ I have a beautiful boyfriend ( @z0mbified-dog )a beautiful partner ( @allo-196 )and I'm nowhere close to stop looking for more
☆ different alters have different opinions on faith, but we're always either atheist or orthodox
☆ no DNI if I don't like you I block :) But respect your own DNI based off my stances, and don't whine about it to me. Minors can interact and follow but I am an adult and I post mature stuff. I believe y'all can be mature but also not my problem if you're not
✦ anti censorship
✦ anti harassment
✦ anti radqueer and radnormal
✦ anti endo/willo or supporters
✦ profic (proship stance in details here)
✦ pro para (pro consent / anti contact with unconsening real life humans or animals)
✦ pro kink
✦ I'm against t. r. a. s. h., this includes sexism against anyone, racism against any group of people, and transandrophobia. cry about it.
✦ if you use narcissist, psycho, or schizo as an insult I will personally shoot you in the guts.
✦ proship choco can suck my big cock because that's clearly what they're after <3
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey I’ve just figured out my stance on Endogenic systems since I wasn’t aware of the concept before and don’t understand why they get hate.
It just seems to be a different approach to plurality as a spiritual ideal or form of identity? I’m interested in knowing why anyone has an issue with it since it doesn’t seem to be hurting anyone? They aren’t necessarily invading plural/system spaces imo since they are plural. Disorder specific communities and endo identity are different things I’ll say though.
Please don’t take this in bad faith.
they are the result from a hate group, and mainly, I have an issue with them forcing themselves on CDD spaces. you can also see on pluralpedia that they have labels that are essentially made to mock CDD systems (mockgenic, mcdonaldsgenic, sysmedgenic)
as well as harassing trauma victims by creating insults about them being victims of trauma (traumascum, for example)
and simply, there is no proof of them existing in the first place, no scientific proof of why someone could be a system without trauma, because a system forms when trauma causes the brain to create barriers between different alters, and those are what causes splitting (VERY BAD DESCRIPTION OF IT. I'M NOT A DOCTOR)
you can have your own opinion and I don't have a problem with being asked why I feel the way I do, but also I'm not the best person for it since I can't explain myself as well as others do. @/anti-willo-miku and @/anti-willo-solivan are my personal favorites when it comes to their knowledge on it so I suggest you check them out instead
I don't want them to interact with me because if you are not a system because of trauma, I'm not interested in your experiences because they're essentially different from mine, and I don't want to be compared, it very much makes me uncomfortable that something that I see as a consequence of something that ruined my life is for someone something that "just happens".
I used to be pro-endo, but endos are extremely predatory in how they are when someone suspects plurality, and they barely ever acknowledge that someone may have trauma at all.
Being unable to remember your trauma is one of the main symptoms of CDDs, I understand why some people would think they don't have any.
but considering how big their community is, would they not have anything that's a bit more reliable as proof than ccards or tumblr blogs? most of the sources I've been given are either those or some cherry picked parts of larger studies on CDD systems. Or a common misconception of the DSM V, which is a DIAGNOSTIC manual, and states that if someone is not bothered by their multiplicity, they shouldn't be diagnosed with DID (or OSDD). That is because if someone is not already bothered by their possible disorder, a diagnosis will not bring anything positive, and quite the opposite can cause the worsening of someone's symptoms because in your head, if you know something is "wrong", you'll start feeling it much more. It's basically placebo effect but on the negative side.
And also, just think very logically with me for a second. IF there is a form of multiplicity that doesn't come from trauma, it would still be considered a neurodivergency of sorts. Because that's what neurodivergency essentially is, any variation of what the average brain functions. It doesn't matter if youd born with it (like autism is something you're born with, too, for example), as many endos claim, or if you develop it later in life (like CDDs). It would still be considered a neurodivergency because it affects someone's life from a neurological way. And the fact endos claim the opposite kinda goes to show they don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
As for the history of tulpamancy, this post explains it quite well
also thanks for the CW /gen it definitely helps with seeing this as a genuine question, which I do, and again, don't mind at all
I also really hope me tagging tw syscourse doesn't bring endos here. I've had that happen before because "tagging syscourse means you want to be harassed- uhm that you want a discussion! " when I am tagging TW syscourse which is a different thing and it's just a warning.
I've seen so many posts lately like "trans men have got to get more feminine" and it's lowkey pissing me off because we haven't even normalized trans men being masculine yet. Have you not been paying attention to trans men when they talk about being kicked out of LGBT spaces for "appearing too cishet" like can we lock in and understand that sexuality and oftentimes gender aren't something you can visually tell before we start trying to normalize something that's already normalized
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
criticisms of criticisms of shinigami eyes and my criticisms of them
i gathered these screenshots to respond on the points being made. this is not an invitation to harass anyone in these screenshots or even anyone associated with them. harassing people wont change their mind, it often has the opposite effect actually. so if you dont like them, just ignore or block
sigh, where do i even start? lets start with the first post...
i know of an intersex transfem whos beliefs are more similar to yours than mine. fae reblogs mostly stuff about transfeminism, uses the terms tma and tme in discussions, talks a lot about how transfems are affected by transmisogyny. these arent bad things, im not saying these to paint faer in a bad light, just that fae is more aligned with yall than me. but apparently, faes marked red in shinigami eyes
so no, even by that standard, its not that reliable
okay, its the most telling lineup because its genderqueer while not being strictly transfeminine? like, just because its not focused on transfeminine experiences doesnt mean its not worth talking about. also, its not strictly transfeminine but it can include transfeminine experiences. if theres a browser extension made by autistic people and its criticized for being harmful to autistic and ocd people, those being focused on neurodivergence that doesnt center autism doesnt make the criticism bad. it also doesnt make it anti autism. and a lot of autistic peoples neurodivergence intersects with the other two, so its not a clear statement of "us" vs "them" either
i guess to summarize this part, there are transfems who are affected by transandrophobia, exorsexism, and intersexism.
uh no, the one excluding them was the previous person, not people who fight for exorsexism and intersexism
im genuinely confused why people use tma/tme instead of transfems/non-transfems. aside from being shorter, if theyre pretty much identical, why do people use the tma/tme dichotomy?
anyway, its weird to call transandrophobic a "transmisogynistic dogwhistle". its just a term for mostly transmascs to talk about their oppression. people can talk about their oppression without it being an opposition to another oppressed group
exorsexism - had to google this one, it's discrimination against nonbinary people, which just like awwbrie's tags pointed out is ludicrous since tma enbies exist.
sigh, again. people can talk about their oppression without it being an opposition to another oppressed group. also, yeah, transfem enbies exist, they can talk about their experience of exorsexism too.
copy paste the same thing for intersexism cause im just repeating myself a lot.
oh yeah, this is about shinigami eyes
a significant number of tmes get upset when they get called out on their transmisogyny and get super defensive over it, viewing it as encroaching on their status of permanent victimhood
okay, you pointed out that nonbinary transfems and intersex transfems exist. ive seen intersex as well as nonbinary transfems talk about intersexism and exorsexism (some even talk about transandrophobia), so no, these criticisms arent just from upset "tmes". also, even if it is, they can still criticize something for being exorsexist or intersexist. and not everyone who gets marked red on shinigami eyes is a transmisogynistic tme. on my example earlier, i mentioned an intersex transfem transfeminist whos marked red. while fae doesnt complain about it, i do have problems with shinigami eyes being presented as a reliable indicator of whos a transmisogynist and who isnt.
and so they willfully misunderstand all of it. all of the terminology and what it means. what tme/tma are, what transmisogyny is, how intersectionality functions and so on.
and so they make posts complaining about it, which by all means - everyone's entitled to vent, even if they're completely wrong in what they're saying. (if it stayed there that'd be amazing but often they take that defensiveness as justification to harass us, painting themselves as the victims at the same time)
i do agree with this. but i disagree with the framing. youre framing everyone who disagree as "tmes who willfully misunderstand the concept of transfeminism" and that they "take that defensiveness as justification to harass us, painting themselves as the victims at the same time"
i know that people like those exist. i know a lot of awful people harass transfems and transfeminists. i do not condone their actions, and from what ive seen from other people, so do most of the people talking about transandrophobia, intersexism, and exorsexism. if there are people from these communities, its completely valid to complain about them. but its extremely misleading to paint these communities as transmisogynists. and its even more harmful to paint the idea of these oppressions being talked about as signs of a transmisogynist. transmisogyny is a big problem in the trans community, queer community, and society as a whole. but not every kind discussion about oppression is in response to that.
also, ive seen a transfeminist openly start a harassment campaign to drive a transmasc into deleting his blog and her community celebrated it when it happened. it would be absurd for me to project that behavior to the entire transfeminist movement. the community is made up of different kinds of people, all with different ideas on whats okay and whats not okay. if someones okay with using her riling up her community to flood somoenes dms and asks with harassment, that doesnt mean everyone else is okay with it.
conclusion, uhh.. talking about transandrophobia, exorsexism, and intersexism isnt an opposition to talking about transmisogyny. there are intersections to these, theyre all important issues to discussions. criticisms against a transfeminist extension isnt a criticism against transfeminism as a whole. and actions from a couple people from a community doesnt directly reflect the intentions of the community as a whole.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Kinger isn't ableist. Using a fictional character to be anti-science and history is irredeemably stupid and in a decade you'll change your mind. Seen it happen to a bunch of you pathetic shitheads.
finally some hate! my "shame" category was feeling pretty empty
Kinger isn't ableist, that's true, that's why he's against a literal hate group. good way to show you're not ableist by calling disabled people shitheads btw
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Reminder that political figures, abusers, bigots and general bad people aren't "delusional", "brain-dead", "narcissistic" or "psychotic" for the horrible things they do.
They're assholes. Or arrogant. Or power hungry. Or abusive. Or bigoted. Or heavily biased. Or criminals. Or violent. Or aggressive. Or out of touch. Or genocidal. Or any other descriptive word for what they're doing that doesn't make an already stigmatised symptom any more demonised.
