scared I’ll get slimed for this but I feel like you may understand what I mean
very very sorry if you don’t want people ranting abt wc in your inbox!! I like to debate cars but I don’t want to bother anyone 😓
(cw: grooming mention, I’m very sorry if that’s too heavy for you so feel free to skip/ignore this ask)
I think it’s completely fine and good to find age gap relationships in wc and to explore the implications that would have:
I think people need to remember that I’m pretty sure the majority of those were just like the authors didn’t give a fuck about the ages and were an accident. Again, completely fine to explore but I just think it should be kept in mind it’s not usually intentional
TO REMEMBER ACTUAL ON PAGE VICTIMS OF ABUSE AND GROOMING
pinestar and leopardfoot have an appalling age gap. Pinestar *is* toxic to her, but I don’t think the extreme age gap was an intentional part of/used overly in the text of their relationship or why he was portrayed as a bad partner (in the text of their book specifically)
Spottedpaw and thistleclaw is a very overt example of grooming that, on page and in canon, the age gap is vital to why that relationship is deplorable. Another example is ivypool and Hawkfrost, which while unlike the other 2 is not implied romantic books, is stillan example of grooming
Again I do like how people explore the bad implications created in the text, but I just have seen a lot of people try to deny characters like spottedleaf or ivypool are victims, while at the same time making hcs for how other characters are, and I suspect it’s because they are flawed and have their own faults which I think is a bad mentality to have about victims and it bugs me how often I’ve seen it but idk maybe I’ve just gotten a skewed perspective on how often I see this 😭
this is just a discussion/debate topic from me so curious on ur thoughts LOL (sorry I’m very paranoid to be interpreted as trying to fight 🥲)
yeahh partially agree. i think a lot of people tend to either dismiss the possibility of the writers accidentally creating unhealthy relationships outright, OR take everything extremely literally without accounting for weird cat aging rates or timeline inconsistencies and then apply a strict moral judgment on that. the "apprentice = teenager, warrior = adult" thing is something i don't think is universally and consistently accurate through all of the series, especialy earlier on. i think the naming system and how fast cats age flag up a lot of alarm for some people but to take a canon relationship as an example i don't think, say, feathercrow are written like or intended to be a grown ass woman hanging out with a teenage boy, despite the technicalities of the timeline pointing to that being the case.
there is nothing wrong with picking up on details like age or power gaps and exploring that in your own interpretations or opinions, but with the way a lot of these things are written there clearly isn't any intention for most contentious relationships to be predatory/unbalanced and this tends to reflect in the narrative and characterisation that form the canon so i don't blame anyone for engaging with these things earnestly. "authorial intent" is not the end all be all to be clear but yknow what im saying? i think a lot of takes on the topic are made in bad faith or come off kinda silly
i'm also not even the biggest shipper but it is frankly really difficult to pair up these cats if you need everyone to be within a moon or two age of each other and completely unrelated via all possible retcons. LMAO