Right 2 Write

This is a very long comment w/background info on Charlie Kirk & TPUSA:

1-First and foremost Charlie was a political activist. His mission was always to seize control of the RNC while becoming the next Rush Limbaugh

2-Charlie Kirk is on video (in multiple states) shaming Christian college students for standing on the biblical commandments & principles of sexuality.

3-To this day, his twitter shames a young college male and labels him a Christian EXTREMIST bc he politely disagreed w/Charlie that biblical sexuality should be a requirement for the conservative political platform. Charlie angrily told the student that he didn't belong in the conservative movement and he didn't belong in Trump's movement.  He even made fun of the kid for reading his question off his mobile device.

4-CK told Dave Rubin: I'm an Evangelical Christian so I believe in marriage bw 1 man & 1 woman AND also I think it's great that you can get married and adopt a baby and get that tax credit.

5-After the midterms Trump (the candidate I voted for in 3 general elections) labeled Christians a "disloyal" voting bloc bc he said if Evangelicals voted then "we would never lose an election." The result was the birth of TP faith and Kirk began to learn the lingo & chase the low propensity values voters that Scott Presler had trouble reaching. I have no problem with educating the church about the issues & rallying us to vote but CK employed a committee to help him craft language to appeal to low propensity religious values voters. Unfortunately when unrehearsed questions arose, Charlie is on video trating believers in an unloving rude manner and in some instances lying, like 3 years ago during the Q&A at pastor Gary Hammerick's Cornerstone Church in VA

->The TPUSA/Charlie Kirk Origin Story:

6-TPUSA was Co-Founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk and William "Bill" Montgomery with a mission  "to identify educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of freedom, free markets, and limited government.” Kirk's passion was always to make the GOP/RNC crowded. His idol was Rush Limbaugh and he had every intention of not only taking over the RNC but also taking over for Rush.

7-In May 2012 Kirk attended 'Youth Government Day' for 400 HS kids to DEMONSTRATE the difference between two (2) political movements:  The Tea Party & Occupy Wall Street. Montgomery noticed that the audience was 'bored silly' until the 7th speaker, Charlie Kirk, woke up the students after only a 20 second demonstration.

8-Kirk had been rejected by West Point Military Academy and chose to take courses at his local community college while he applied for university (he later described it as a gap year).

9-Montgomery says he approached Kirk and said, "Charlie Kirk you don't know me but you can't go to college. He was 18 yo, he was going to go to Baylor. I said, 'you've got to start an organization to reach out to young people in this country.' For the next 2.5 years, he & I traveled all over the country & because he was 18, he couldn't rent a car, couldn't get into a hotel----it was the most fun, exciting time of my life...to know that this country was going to be saved." That's how TPUSA was built & even Co-Founded in 2012 out of a two (2) car garage in Lamont, IL by two (2) Illinois residents:  18 year old Charlie Kirk and by retiree, William "Bill" Montgomery.

10-Attendees to all the Charlie Kirk "vigils" received cards with QR codes to invite 10 friends to register to vote because those closet to him told the Washington Examiner, "voter registration is what Charlie would have wanted."

11-Attendees to the Arizona gathering were asked to register to vote outside of the arena by TPUSA activists and inside the arena at voter registration tables with posters of Charlie that said, "I want you to vote."

TPUSA wasn't handing out bibles, lunches, beverages... they were registering attendees to VOTE because that was Charlie's expressed mission in life. He lived and died as a political activist. Call him a political martyr but don't conflate his political activism with Christianity simply because the SUSPECT may or may not identify with trans ideology.

By the way, there were voter registration tables & tables selling merch to raise MONEY in honor of Charlie inside the Arizona memorial. There were multiple messages requesting donations throughout the televised assembly, multiple fundraising emails & text messages before, during & after the assembly. Money for TPUSA, not funds to care for the widows & orphans around the world----political money. It reminds me of the Act Blue fundraising model set up by the Democrats to exploit emotions during crisis.

>The TPUSA conferences begin on Sunday the day most Believers celebrate and worship the risen Lord. Even Chick fil A gives employees a day off to worship on "the Lord's Day." This means attendees, staffers and facilities & event employees are not resting, spending time w/their families, serving &/or worshipping God---they are serving TPUSA. During the conferences, VIP guests are treated to a special lounge complete w/an alcoholic bar.

Speaking of MONEY:

>Charlie recently boasted about his wealth on the Iced Coffee podcast.

>He disclosed that he doesn't live off of his 6 figure salary. Instead he employs an investment team to invest 75-80% of his salary on his behalf.

>CK runs a FOR profit PR/narrative company w/his business partner and TPUSA spokesman.

>CK even bragged about the riches he made bc he bullishly invested (like Jewish Bill Ackman) during covid.

>CK has book royalties via Trump's publishing company,

>a generous executive salary & benefits package now transferred to his widow the new CEO

>generous life insurance policy >Tucker Carlson via his nicotine pouches company established a give send go that raised (six) $6 million dollars for Charlie's widow and Tucker contributed the 1st million.

>Glen Beck gave Erika $500,000. >Even the Daily Wire donated $1 million directly to TPUSA (not Erika) but all of this knowing that Charlie Kirk's widow is already a multi millionaire and TPUSA brings in a whopping $90 million dollars per year!!!

>Even Brandon Tatum (who is quite confused about the true gospel of Christ) claimed he would donate profits from his merch sales to Erika Kirk.

>What is going on and why does it matter? It matters because Charlie's profession and life mission is currently being rewritten and rebranded as if he lived as a Christian missionary to some poor, non-English speaking tribe of savages in a foreign country like the Christian martyr Jim Elliott.

>CK's death, like the death of George Floyd, is tragically being exploited for political purposes, and ironically Floyd and Kirk share the same birthday which gives even more credence to those in the hegelian psyop crowd

>All idolatry is sin. All lying is sin. The bible says ALL liars will spend eternity in the lake of fire.

We have a so-called Christian apologist who is being unmasked each time he speaks calling this ecumenical movement "a Charlie Kirk revival" and quickly naming CK a Christian martyr amongst Stephen, John the Baptist, and calling CK an apologist all while he re-traumatizes viewers wearing the same white Freedom t-shirt worn when CK was assassinated. I'm keeping my eyes peeled for what will surely be his new book on CK the martyr. Notice he never addresses the fact that Charlie Kirk refused to call the Mormon to repent and be born again. Also everyone is quietly ignoring the snarkyanswer CK gave about guns. We still don't know who murdered CK bc in America the suspect is innocentuntil proven guilty & he claims he's innocent. So why the rush to pin the heinous crime on this suspect?

We know on April 5, 2023, CK angered many people with this quote bc after his murder it was pinned to multiple posts & comments: "I think it's worth it.

I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment protect our other God-given rights."

>Wake up Church. Wake up Conservatives. Please come Quickly Lord Jesus😢

The People reporter wanted Martha to finally PRAISE Markle and she would not do it. She tried to protect mm's 'privacy' but she refused to lie about that awful megflix show (the way noprah lied about it being a good watch & ignore the critics).

-People Magazine: The cookbook author, 85, was asked if she had any thoughts on Markle stepping into [her] space with her own cooking show, With Love, Meghan.

2- “I had dinner with Meghan Markle the other night. Well she was at the same table uh so I can't say, she wasn't my guest, I was a guest we were both guests at a dinner party in California and she had just gotten back from the palace. I didn’t talk to her really more than to say a couple words, but I know she was talking about it. If you’re an actress, it’s hard to then transition to a princess and then from a princess into a homemaking guru on a television show, it doesn’t sort of follow. So go from there.” Martha Stewart

3- When Martha said "IT doesn't sort of follow" and "she was talking about IT," the reference was MM's transitions from actress to princess to homemaking guru.

4- Did Martha mention a reunion with the king? Did Martha mention Harry's father? Did Martha say she overheard a conversation? MM over-shared details of their fabulous vacation in a 4+ page spread for People Magazine and in other publications so it was quite unnecessary to label Martha, the Domestic Diva, as "confused."

Neil, Martha Stewart wasn't unkind. People Magazine (sussex mouthpiece) knew about the fundraiser and set Martha up. Previously Martha was set up by a different (sussex) reporter and she said she's never seen the show and hoped MM was authentic. She went on to compliment Gwyneth Paltrow.

The People reporter wanted Martha to finally PRAISE MM and she would not do it. She tried to protect mm's privacy but she refused to lie about the cringey tv show (the way noprah lied about it being a good watch & ignore the critics).

Neil check the court circular. That polo match wasn't in Windsor and William was NOT in attendance. Meghan showed up with Serena Williams & her husband (Alexis) because she had pre-arranged for the paparazzi to take photos of her with Serena who was in town to prepare for tennis match.

Foster told the press he never met either child and they weren't close

Katherine & MM did not attend the same high school

Harry looked like he was on drugs.

>I noticed Dan cut off Martha. Here is the question from People Magazine who has become the sussex mouthpiece:

1-People Magazine: The cookbook author, 85, was asked if she had any thoughts on Markle stepping into [her] space with her own cooking show, With Love, Meghan.

2- “I had dinner with Meghan Markle the other night. Well she was at the same table uh so I can't say, she wasn't my guest, I was a guest we were both guests at a dinner party in California and she had just gotten back from the palace. I didn’t talk to her really more than to say a couple words, but I know she was talking about it. If you’re an actress, it’s hard to then transition to a princess and then from a princess into a homemaking guru on a television show, it doesn’t sort of follow. So go from there.” Martha Stewart

3- me: When Martha said "IT doesn't sort of follow" and "she was talking about IT," the reference was MM's transitions from actress to princess to homemaking guru.

4- me: Did Martha mention a reunion with the king? Did Martha mention Harry's father? Did Martha say she overheard a conversation? MM over-shared details of their fabulous vacation in a 4+ page spread for People Magazine and in other publications so it was quite unnecessary to label Martha, the Domestic Diva, as "confused." Perhaps they were not seated at the same table---- that doesn't mean MM didn't run her mouth to someone about how the invisibles can go on holiday and "just be kids;" not to mention how "she is very supportive and there's a lot of sadness."

>Mark is wrong about so many things 🤦‍♂️

1-Invictus was never designed to be "Harry." Prior to Meghan turning up in 2017 (in her ripped jeans), Invictus was for the VETERANS.

2-Harry never commanded $1 million dollars per speech with the Harry Walker agency. Stop being ridiculous.

3-Harry & Meghan never "had celebrities." George Clooney didn't even know Harry or Meghan when he attended their wedding.

4-You're also wrong about NOprah as she and Tyler Perry remain friends w/the duo.

Taz, you gave out 1 bit of misinformation. When Megz attended Wimbledon and had Jill Smoller clear out a section for her, Lindsey & Genevieve they were not watching a Centre Court match. Serena was not playing on Centre Court which is where the Royal Box is located.

No Kinsey there wasn't any confusion. Harry stays at 5 star hotels when he visits London and he never had any intention of accessing the standing courtesy accommodation at BP until he learned that he might need to make a speech to coincide with his legal judgment.

It was people like you that hyped up Harry coming to London & staying at a royal residence when the palace never said anything of the sort.

Harry was never coming here for a family visit, he was supposedly coming for wounded veterans & one has nothing to do with the other. If he wanted to visit with his father, we would would never hear anything about it.

That is not "all you need to know" bc what you shared is misinformation. Harry has always had a standing accommodation at Buckingham Palace as a courtesy and over the years he has not once desired to take the palace up on the offer.

>For sone reason in June, his team leaked the standing accommodation to the press ahead of this trip which is supposedly for wounded veterans.

>Harry travels to London and reserves multiple floors at 5 star hotels, so no way he wants to be confined to an old, dark suite at BP.

>He essentially told the Palace, "forget all our leaks to the press, 'I'm not coming to BP.' "

>Then he learned about his legal judgment & thought BP would be the perfect backdrop to deliver his reaction statement

>he would only need the property for a few hours & yes there would be a film crew

>the palce said, "no."

>now harry is having a tenper tantrum bc he lost the judgment

>He did not come to the UK to meet his father, he supposedly organized this trip to support wounded soldiers

>Harry never even asked his father for a meeting

Why do you, the press, continue to equate the king seeing his grandchildren with the invictus games? One has nothing to do with the other. You are part of the problem. The games are not about Harry or his family issues. The games are about the wounded veterans. When Harry views connecting his invisibles with charles & thomas markle, they will do what normal families do---- privately set aside time during a holiday to coordinate trips to visit with the grandparents. It's not a priority for Harry. He likes to use his father's name for headlines & stories & you, the press, instead of ignoring him----you rise to the occasion allowing him to hijack the royal brand SEO.

Obviously, the people don't care about Harry. Everyone wants Harry to go away & stay away. Please stop trying to normalize dysfunction to sell papers or get clicks.

2-The judge was explicit about Harry's security needs based on a legitimate risk assessment, not some report put together by 20 year olds in Tennessee whose VP benefits from any money received from the UK taxpayer.

3-Do you see why he lost that phone hacking case and should be charged with perjury? He can't even tell the truth about a STANDING accommodation that he has ALWAYS had access to at BP, as a courtesy. The truth is that he doesn't like staying at BP so he rents at a 5 star hotel. Remember the Coronation? He had to use BP to access his fake medals etc but otherwise he refused the overnight "courtesy" accommodations.

4-a man ringing stranger's doorbells is not afraid of terrorists. Think back to all the unnecessary trips he's made to the UK over the past 3 years plus court. Where did he stay? He leaked his whereabouts to YOU in the media and was even filmed accepting Deliveroo and wandering around neighborhoods ringing random doorbells.

5-You are misinformed about Buckingham Palace. Harry turned down his standing offer to stay at BP until he realized the phone hacking judgement would be published on Monday. He only wanted BP for 1 night so that he could grandstand as the king's son on location from the palace.

6-Harry prefers to stay at 5 star hotels where he rents out 2+floors and he typically reports to the media where he's staying and I'm shocked that none of you mentioned this!!!

7-He runs some sustainable travel group so why doesn't he use technology to interact with athletes since the games won't be held until 2027. The games are 1 year away!  The amount of money these charities waste on spending a few hours getting photops is criminal.

>Canada paid over $60+ million dollars to host the Invictus games in 2025. That is highway robbery & mismanagement of funds. Harry & his wife were hanging out at 5 star hotels, hockey game, fancy restaurants... Do you know what 500 families could do with $60 million dollars???? Funny you never report on Africa Parks or how he's being sued by Sentebale.

8-What happened to all the WellChild sponsors that were on board when William volunteered for the organization? Why haven't you covered how all those sponsors just disappeared in 2018-2019?

9-Harry's behavior is no different from Fergie

10-the children were never coming to London. If he wanted a family visit, he should arrange a family trip not grift off the donations of wounded soldiers & sick kids.

11-

12-Stop it Gail. Harry never even asked his father to meet with him during this trip to the UK.

>Gail after all that you did to spread lies about people you dont even know, you expect anyone to believe that you care about whether or not he visits with his brother? It's over and you are a major factor in the reason he will never be reconciled with family, friends and country.

1-Anne, Edward, the Gloucesters, Sophie etc all get the SAME level of security that Harry currently receives TODAY. In fact, Harry has more security bc unlike the other royals, he constantly has protection officers with him! They do not! Watch the video of Harry at Chatham House. He published his full itinerary two (2) weeks ago and the only people lined up to see him were members of the media, just like in 2025.

2-The judge was explicit about Harry's security needs based on a legitimate risk assessment, not some report put together by 20 year olds in Tennessee whose VP benefits from any money received from the UK taxpayer.

3-Do you see why he lost that phone hacking case and should be charged with perjury? He can't even tell the truth about a STANDING accommodation that he has ALWAYS had access to at BP, as a courtesy. The truth is that he doesn't like staying at BP so he rents at a 5 star hotel. Remember the Coronation? He had to use BP to access his fake medals etc but otherwise he refused the overnight "courtesy" accommodations.

4-a man ringing stranger's doorbells is not afraid of terrorists. Think back to all the unnecessary trips he's made to the UK over the past 3 years plus court. Where did he stay? He leaked his whereabouts to YOU in the media and was even filmed accepting Deliveroo and wandering around neighborhoods ringing random doorbells.

5-You are misinformed about Buckingham Palace. Harry turned down his standing offer to stay at BP until he realized the phone hacking judgement would be published on Monday. He only wanted BP for 1 night so that he could grandstand as the king's son on location from the palace. 6-Harry prefers to stay at 5 star hotels where he rents out 2+floors and he typically reports to the media where he's staying and I'm shocked that none of you mentioned this!!!

7-He runs some sustainable travel group so why doesn't he use technology to interact with athletes since the games won't be held until 2027. The games are 1 year away!  The amount of money these charities waste on spending a few hours getting photops is criminal.

>Canada paid over $60+ million dollars to host the Invictus games in 2025. That is highway robbery & mismanagement of funds. Harry & his wife were hanging out at 5 star hotels, hockey game, fancy restaurants... Do you know what 500 families could do with $60 million dollars???? Funny you never report on Africa Parks or how he's being sued by Sentebale.

8-What happened to all the WellChild sponsors that were on board when William volunteered for the organization? Why haven't you covered how all those sponsors just disappeared in 2018?

9-His personal friend runs Scotty's little Soldiers and they should be investigated. Likewise, we now know that his LARGE donation to that bbc charity didn't come out of his own pocket. It came from his mother's trust. Is he using that donation to grift himself into UK travel accommodations etc

1-He has known for over 12 mo that he planned to be in the UK this summer for another unnecessary Invictus "event." Instead of contacting his father with his dates of travel, Harry chose to completely ignore Charles. He deliberately chose not to share his idea/intentions w/the king's secretary, not even a so much as a request for lunch or tea sometime during that week.

2-Harry & wife focused on creating vanity opportunities to grift off the misfortunes of sick & bereaved children, and veterans.

>The Scotty's event will be held at a castle which was probably chosen as the perfect opportunity to unmask the invisibles after 1st snapping a People Magazine cover photo with grandpa & the invisibles

3-They paid to splash PR reports across American media outlets w/headlines suggesting that King Charles has welcomed Harry & wife back to UK & back into the fold. They will reside at a palace & Charles will pay for security.

4- So many lies. They both prefer to sleep at 5star hotels where they can reserve entire floors to accommodate their entourage. Not to mention the wife's favorite Soho Farmhouse which is closer to Birmingham.

No way they are in Europe during this heat wave. Just another lie.

5-When they traveled by private plane roundtrip from Montecito to London for the late Queen's Platinum Jubilee, no one in the UK captured any paparazzi images of the couple or any children. This is precisely the reason many royal watchers do not believe the invisibles actually met Charles and/or the Queen during their overnight visit to Frogmore Cottage.

The irony is that Backgrid did distribute photos of Harry & wife sitting in a vehicle at the Santa Barbara airport as their vehicles are loaded up with gifts and luggage from their trip to the UK.

He always has private protection officers. He has always had access to accommodations at a royal estate, but he feels more comfortable staying in 5 star hotels!!!

What the judge explicitly ruled unreasonable (months ago) is his request for a taxpayer funded blue light motorcade. He's no longer a royal but he requested a perk that working royals don't even use!

Instead of apologizing (like you) for things he's said & done in the past (see him on meg kelly's show), he brings you & others on his platform to co-sign his nasty, messy attacks on the brf.

The nasty gossip he repeats about Catherine is not to meant to fight for her honor. Showing 1 photo where she wasn't waving when 5 min later she was waving in an effort to spread the lies that at the crack of dawn when normal parents of small kids were asleep, C & W were frosty & angry w/ Camilla & Charles at Trooping the Colour. Please. They weren't thinking about those 2. If anything they were worried about Charles whose still undergoing chemo, Catherine & her horse allergies, George & his allergies...but just like the Catherine's wearing a wig story, Dan just cannot resist.

(BTW he's been unnaturally obsessed w/her hair since her wedding day!)

Repeating nonsense about her university days & breakup with William to Camilla Tominey's phone conversation. All for clicks at the expense of sowing seeds of discord.

All adult children & parents have differences of opinion but Sykes & Wootton are obsessed w/over analyzing Charles & William through the flaws of their own fathers.

They spread lies, like no one can say Sparry's name in William's presence or they'll be thrown out." When the truth is that William still protects his traitorous brother & doesn't allow people to criticize him or make fun of him in his presence.

This is simply a warning for you bc the book of Proverbs teaches us that "bad communication corrupts good morals" & "if we walk with the wise, we grow wise but a companion of fools suffers harm." ❤

A Plea to Tumblr Royal Watchers: Stop giving views, clicks & comments to Dan Wootton, Rob Shuter, Tom Sykes, Mark Dolan*...etc

Deat Cat, I hope to elaborate when time permits, but for now: these so-called brf commentators are (as the cool kids say), "Out Here Doing the Most." Shuter & Sykes have long been on the Sussex payroll, but Dan Wootton is a liar & a coward who masquerades as a messy NONLE gossip to maintain his pro-Cambridge/Wales audience.At the moment I'm short on time, otherwise I would finally edit & share 1 of my many saved drafts exposing Dan for his MANY failed attempts to cover up for the part he played in Where is Kate. Instead of simply saying, "I'm sorry. I messed up." He doubles down on his innocence with hopes that we will all forget. Well, the tumblr bloggers haven't forgotten.I don't like to make accusations without citations. Your readers need only revisit the nasty interview Dan gave to Megyn Kelly to hear how he trully feels about "but her name is Kate!!!" and her "embarrassing" illness.In preparation for (the Daily Beast's) Tom Sykes' upcoming novel about the king & his heir, Wootton is again using Sykes & Charlotte Griffiths rumors about Charles & William to get his clicks.Case in point, Dan deceptively asserts that Catherine wasn't smiling & waving at Trooping the Colour because she was angry at Charles & Camilla for welcoming Sparry & ILBW to the UK: Wootton's Proof of a so-called frosty Princes shared by Dan Wootton: