
gracie abrams

oozey mess
official daine visual archive

Product Placement
Keni
occasionally subtle

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Cosmic Funnies
cherry valley forever
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
â

PR's Tumblrdome
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

if i look back, i am lost

Origami Around
taylor price
Interview Vampire Daily
art blog(derogatory)

@theartofmadeline

seen from Malaysia

seen from Albania

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Honduras

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Australia

seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Vietnam
seen from Colombia

seen from Philippines
seen from France
seen from Vietnam
@rampagingpoet

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
healthcare should be freeeee what the hell are we doing dumbass government what are we paying you for
thatâs not true, though. yes, the cockroach provides threats but what the hell did the chicken do to you? âthank you chicken for your sacrificeâ that chicken did not consent to being sacrificed and it literally wasnât necessary to sacrifice the chicken. that chicken had its life forcefully taken from it for the sake of chicken nuggets that you will eat once and then forget. itâs cruel and itâs horrible and you SHOULD have moral justifications against it.
Polar bears donât ask for consent before eating humans. Anyways, Iâm gonna keep getting the chicken before it gets me first.
unfollowed btw. grow some morals
You unfollowed because Iâm not vegetarian. Do you only follow vegetarians or
I already follow you and I can't follow you harder but you should absolutely continue eating the chickens before they eat you.
Yes. Someone else who understands.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
A lot of my vegetarian friends donât get why I still eat meat even though I mostly eat vegetarian with just occasional meat when left to my own devices and at the end of the day itâs because I just donât have the same moral issues involved with killing animals that they do.
Yes I love animals. I donât love them because theyâre cute and I feel bad for killing them though. I love them as part of the broader ecosystem. I respect them. Probably more than they respect me, because at the end of the day I know that a chicken wouldnât hesitate to eat me if it had the means and I donât see why I shouldnât strike first.
Iâm just not ashamed of being an omnivore. Yes this chicken was once an individual. Thank you chicken for your sacrifice. You were delicious and gave me some very necessary B vitamins.
Re: Team Fortress 2 hats and crypto, I remember when NFTs rolled out and they were trying to make blockchain/NFT games a thing one of the core points they had was âItâs items you can trade between players that are worth real moneyâ
Which like, I know the mechanics of TF2 hats and NFTs are probably different on some level but as someone with a limited understanding of crypto NFTs literally just looked like TF2 hat economy running on crypto, especially when applied to games
Well, yes â crypto fundamentally doesn't do anything that isn't possible without it. Lots of non-crypto games have real-cash economies. Which isn't a good thing, either, but it's a separate issue from the crypto thing!
Much like the relationship between crypto and banking, the idea behind using NFTs to implement cash economies in games is that, in theory, it would allow the exchange of items to be carried out and validated without involving any central authority. In practice, of course, this falls down even harder than cryptocurrency; at least with cryptocurrencies you're dealing with abstract financial instruments â with real-cash game economies, the game's physical servers need to be owned and operated by somone, and if that someone decides not to recognise the validity of your NFT, what the fuck are you going to do? Authority over virtual environments is inherently centralised by virtue of centralised physical infrastructure dependency, no matter what the magic paperwork says.
(This issue could, in theory, partly be worked around by hosting the game in question on a globally distributed network of servers whose owners and operators have entered into a mutual voluntary agreement to always recognise the same blockchains. However, as far as I'm aware no proponent of NFT-driven game economies has ever put forth a realistic proposal for how to accomplish that; the few NFT advocates who aren't just grifters seem to be under the impression that if you just get the software side right, the physical infrastructure side will sort itself out automatically, which has literally never proven true at any point in history.)
friend of mine recommended a video essay that's like 5 hours long about why it's currently a whole Thing for fascists to claim they only eat meat and demonize vegetables etc etc, and it's genuinely quite well researched in many places and contains some fascinating history and has made me feel very weird about my status as an adult who enjoys drinking milk. but I've not finished it and I genuinely don't know if I will because at one point the ol' "you can't say you care about animals and also eat animals" chestnut got dropped by the white vegan essayist and it put such a bad taste in my mouth that I had to leave instantly
like idk man it just feels genuinely parodic to dedicate hours to analyzing how foodways have frequently been used as white supremacist propaganda and then casually toss out an argument that pretty invariably demonizes indigenous hunting practices with 0 regard for traditional knowledge and land stewardship guiding those practices
Every time I hear a white vegan say that I want to throw the rubble of the Klamath Dams at them.
The largest dam removal in U.S. history. So successful that the salmon that havenât run freely in the river for literally over a century came back the next year. Not steady progress over a decade as expected, the very next salmon run they came home. No one alive saw salmon in that river outside the hatcheries kept by nativeâs tribes and the Department of Fish And Wildlife scientists desperately trying to save them. One of the activists who helped bring the suit spoke of their dying grandmother making them promise to bring the fish home, and they didnât know how that was possible, but they spent decades doing it.
The legal basis for successfully suing the power company who owned the dams was Indigenous treaty rights to eat the fish. Eating the fish was the one thing in a century that succeeded in being a clear and legally binding right that superseded the desires of white capital and industry. I have been going to the public interest environmental law conference off and on for 20 years where a lot of organizing for Undam The Klamath happened. Iâve heard updates about every legal tact they tried as they happened, and they tried everything.
There are healthy, thriving salmon, trout, and lamprey in a rewilding and recovering Klamath River right now as a direct result of Indigenous people eating them. Of their legally binding right to eat them. They sure as fuck care more about those fish than any white vegan ever could. They are salmon people that the Creator sent Salmon to feed, while charging the People with protecting and stewarding them. Itâs not possible to learn about salmon and trout in the Pacific Northwest without learning this, and itâs unambiguously racist to dismiss this symbiotic relationship.
The white vegans are trying to get all hunting and fishing banned in Oregon, and thatâs quite possibly the single most catastrophic thing that could be done to the animals here because we killed off all the major predators of creatures like deer and without anything hunting them their numbers will explode, eat all the vegetation, destroy the ecosystem, and then die along with everything else in that failing ecosystem. Controlled hunting of deer is vitally necessary for the deer to survive. This is something Native people know, but patronizing racist savior-complex white people refuse to listen to.
I have a whole collection of Oregonâs Public Broadcastingâs documentaries about Klamath River or the larger story of fish and people in the region. If you watch nothing else, watch Klamath Dams Are Coming Out, First Salmon Ceremony, After The Dams, and First Decent (Native made). It could not be clearer that the salmon are being protected and nourished by the people who eat them, and that stewardship is a massive part of their creation myths. But it contradicts political vegan dogma so they donât listen.
The Klamath River Runs Free
#also do you have any idea how much conservation is funded by people who want to eat those animals#at least in the us anytime someone buys ammo or hunting equipment or hunting licenses that money goes directly to state wildlife agencies
its really fun how you can frame accurate information in an extremely dishonest manner and use this to push whatever agenda you want
someone should take advantage of this for political purposes
A lot of my vegetarian friends donât get why I still eat meat even though I mostly eat vegetarian with just occasional meat when left to my own devices and at the end of the day itâs because I just donât have the same moral issues involved with killing animals that they do.
Yes I love animals. I donât love them because theyâre cute and I feel bad for killing them though. I love them as part of the broader ecosystem. I respect them. Probably more than they respect me, because at the end of the day I know that a chicken wouldnât hesitate to eat me if it had the means and I donât see why I shouldnât strike first.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
i think about rape a lot because i'm an abolitionist and i was raped in the classic Violently Raped By A Stranger way. when i talk about prison abolition with people i often get that push back of like "yeah sure but we still need prisons for rapists and for murders."
putting that guy in prison wouldn't have done anything for me or even for anyone else. rape doesn't stop because we put every rapist in a cage, because a rapist isn't a kind of person. and because everybody can rape and everyone might rape. rape also doesn't happen because of opportunity (not necessarily). it's like, rape happens because it is part of the processes that reconstruct the world we find ourselves in. rape is a force (one of many) that drives gender and racial subordination, which are needed for capitalism to work. rape happens because it has to.
black men and women are raped to reinforce racial hierarchies, women are raped to reinforce their subordination to men and to reconstruct the nuclear family, trans women are raped to dehumanize us. rape is a deterrent and rape is productive. we're raped because we are a threat.
when people say like "what about rapists?" i say there aren't any. i wasn't raped by a person, i was raped because it was necessary.
and honestly i think about rape a lot because it gets me off. and i don't think it's necessary to construe that as like a healing process or a taking back of power or anything like this. i think that all comes after cumming.
conversely I would say this is kinda dumb? while the percentage of crime that can be prevented by putting people in prison is certainly far from 100%, I don't think "I'm just the vehicle for transmitting social forces and systems of oppression" is ever going to be a valid justification for violence and brutality or antisocial acts, even if ideas and ideology can certainly compose part of the explanation.
people can be impulsive, vindictive, resentful, selfish, greedy, insecure, and just plain nasty in so many ways, and managing and redirecting negative emotions can be a lifelong struggle that many people sadly lose, or even more sadly don't even fight.
there are many alternatives to prison (and modern surveillance tech is going to deliver so many more, my goodness be careful what you wish for) but tying every moral blemish to social systems of oppression blinds you to much of human nature as much as focusing only on the individual blinds you to larger structures.
The response to that Data centers post did a thing I find very annoying, which is to hide the implied but unpleasant part of your suggestion. You do this so that your audience can let their eyes slide over the caveat and fill in the rest with their own fantasies. Motte and Bailey but you say the Bailey really fast like the side effects in an drug ad.
In this case it was "We don't need data centers for the internet" (already wrong on its own!) while hiding "4K streaming video is bad and we should just get rid of it for everyone" in the tags, but examples are plentiful
If you could change one thing about the PNW what would it be and why?
No more inconsiderate jackass bastards for reasons I believe to be self-explanatory, but to be fair I'd say that if I lived anywhere else, too
The heartbreak I felt when I saw this and then learned the contest is limited to children under the age of 12
Americans wagered $166 billion on sports last year, more than Hollywood, the music industry, books, and museums combined.
Gotta make gambling cheaper for Americans, Americans now have to pay 52 cents per dollar for a 50:50 bet, when I am president I will make gambling affordable, 40 cents a dollar for a 50:50 bet.
I always wonder (but not enough to read the article) if that total is how much was wagered, how much did Americans actually lose on gambling? which is to say how much is being transferred to the bookies and how much is just being shuffled around from one gambler to another.
Losses are not spread evenly across the betting population. Roughly 95% of total losses are absorbed by just 5% of bettors, a small cohort of heavy users whose spending looks nothing like the casual fan putting $20 on a Sunday parlay. âThat is a problem,â Matheson said.
right that's the other complicating factor: it's a large transfer from one small group, a small transfer from a much larger group, plus the overall question of how much the bookies are draining in total.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I feel like I hate AI slightly less than the average Tumblr user, but it still scares the shit out of me to see how many people now engage in internet arguments by submitting their opponentâs argument to an AI bot and saying âexplain why this is wrong and I am right.â It is concerning first because most AI models are sycophants that will tell you exactly what you want to hear, which makes then extremely potent delusion-confirmers. But itâs even more concerning because learning how to argue for yourselfâ how to evaluate claims, to assess an argument, to find and check sources, to spot flaws in someoneâs caseâ is one of the most important skills you can have in life. If you donât have that, you are unable to evaluate what is true for yourself. You will walk right into the arms of the first crackpot or cult that talks to you when you donât have Claude available. Extremely grim portent that many people seem to find this acceptable
fwiw, here's what opus 5 said when I asked it to argue with this:
^ superpersuasion
It has also been really fun to see people ask Grok similar questions only for it to reply "that's demonstrably false and I'm not gonna lie to spare your feelings"
The really funny thing about comic discourse specifically is that people will often talk about how the way people talk about certain characters online shows they don't read comics, but so many people have written for these characters that you can often pull up a multi-issue run showing them acting the exact way those fans described
The fans are either knowingly or accidentally referencing a specific spin on the character that's likely existed for decades, or failing that, someone sees their posts and eventually makes a version of the character exactly like that