If you are a follower or even just an enjoyer of mullet-man05, aka, the person who got popular because of their BIO
PT: He/him | Heterosexual | Heteroromantic | Monoamorous | Cisgender | AMAB | Perisex | TME Allosexual | Alloromantic | Conventionally attractive (peer-reviewed) | Able-bodied | Neurotypical | 18+ | White | Not Hispanic or Latino | Christian but not weird about it | American | Extrovert | Upper middle class | Right-handed | Singlet | Circumcised | O+ | Football, video games, and Oregon Ducks fan | Evil | Transphobes and U$C fans DNI | Inbox and DMs open
It should be brought to your attention that this guy has absolutely disgusting beliefs. Particularly involving trans men.
The concept of popularizing someone for being a general cisgender heterosexual neurotypical white man who is able to do the bare minimum and "not be transphobic" is already appalling to an extent, but please note. This user is very much actual transphobic. He simply isn't transphobic to women. And it is clear he has the mindset that only trans women can be victimized.
He reblogs, frequently, posts about "tme" people. Often about how "tme" people are "sexualizing" trans women and stealing everything from them. He has reblogged posts diminishing the fact that the tme label is racist and sexist and harmful to people with the reasoning in the post he reblogged being quote
"like, if seeing trans women develop & use terms to discuss transmisogyny makes you so uncomfortable that you have to reverse-engineer the nonsense stance of "descriptive categories are inherently harmful" to justify that discomfort, that implies quite a lot about you"
This disgusting disgusting repost really sealed the deal, the cherry on top, if you will say.
PT: sentiments like "kill all white people" or "kill all men" or "eat the rich" are so pathetically harmless that getting mad about them makes you look like an idiot. like a. they're never going to happen and b. those categories don't exist as like, an irrefutable fact of life that can't be changed; they're social categories that only exist in opposition to those designated as outside of the category. There are not roving gangs of BLM activitists or femnazis or poor people carrying pitchforks and torches and dragging white people/men/rich people out of their homes and killing them in the streets. And failing that, there's no like, coherent path to that being something that happens in society. Mass violence is always enacted against minorities and vulnerable people - taking 'kill all white people' seriously makes you sound like a conservative buying into the great replacement bullshit. Its not gonna happen and you're a pathetic loser for thinking it will.
So let's talk about this.
"A. They're never going to happen"
While it may not be an issue with white people, it is absolutely an issue with trans men.
The right does not want any trans people alive, and this incredibly vocal portion of the left does not want men alive. You can't get rid of all trans people, and you can't get rid of all men, but you can absolutely start to pluck off your common enemy. We life in the world where cisgender women are comfortable to sit alone, in a closed room, with trans men and say things like "honestly. Kill all men. Including you. I see you as a man"
KAM comes from a place of fear. "if they are gone, I will be safer" you do not say, in a private, closed off room with one other people in it. "I want to kill you and everyone like you" if you are as scared as you need to be to truly believe in KAM. This individual may be truly scared of cis men, but she does not see trans men the same. Trans men are not the same. Cis women have power over trans men no matter how victimized they may feel by the word "man".
The same goes for kill all white people. It starts with the disabled and the homeless and it furthers, for both trans men who are disabled or homeless or poc, and white people who are disabled and homeless and trans, into getting rid of them. Because to say you want all of a certain subgroup dead is to say you are willing to pick off the easy ones first. Trans men are the easy ones. Disabled, traumatized, abused, homeless, neurodiverse people exist in both of these groups. Those are the easy ones.
Mullet-man05, with the amount of fame they've accumulate for being a regular, privileged white man, is a bigot.
Note, if you have an anti radqueer account or if you yourself are an anti radqueer who agrees with the message but hates the messenger, please feel free to take the message, and reword it, and share it with the anti radqueer crowd. We don't have to agree on every front to agree that this behavior is wrong.
