through fortune & flame

I'm not even nearly as anti-LLM as most other leftists but part of approaching new technology is "hey let's think real critically about the application and scope of this so we can use it in ways that are worth it and don't cause mass scale societal damage" but the fact that it's being injected into fucking EVERYTHING makes any stance more cautious than "USE LLMS FOR EVERYTHING NOW AND FOREVER" so much more anti than the status quo that I don't even fucking want to add nuance

Like most of the problems people have with LLMs are the natural conclusion of decades of tech companies gaining monopolies, environmental regulations struggling to keep up with new technologies, and a growing semi-privatized surveillance state, as opposed to issues with LLMs themselves. There's a theoretical reality where LLMs are implemented in useful, responsible, and sustainable ways but that reality is so far removed from our current one that none of those points actually matters

the difference between lestat and armands interactions w pop culture is lestat was a guest judge on an ep of rupauls drag race and armand has been a close personal friend of rupauls for the past forty years and is involved in the fracking

they finally let me out of my box. i've been studying the local customs because maybe when the current minister of foreign affairs kicks the bucket i can take his place innit 🌾❤️

they locked me in the box again for replying to everything with innit 😭🌾

Of course no heuristic is universally true, but I think if you're an american who considers themselves "progressive" this is a rule of thumb you should probably be considering more often: If the conversation you're currently participating in is only able to happen because someone is going out of their way to speak *your* language, that's probably not the person who's most in need of informing themselves about the other's country in this conversation.

the sewing machine is like if a horse and an inkjet printer had a child