Sin título

Imagine believing that the cause of discrimination and marginalization of people with disabilities has to do with how many people with disabilities are born.

No matter how many women are forced or pressured to give birth to children with disabilities, discrimination against them will not cease. There may be countless children with Down syndrome or other conditions, but the stigma will not change until we focus on those who have already been born, instead of conceiving more. The priority is those who already experience the world, who already breathe the air and suffer the consequences of an ableist world, and their parents, who cannot provide them with adequate care because they are not sufficiently informed and conditioned, both mentally and economically, to raise a child with special needs.

Do they even know what ableism is? Honestly, I suspect it is more ableist to force women with physical or mental disabilities to go through a pregnancy and give birth.

It's also frustrating when a fetal disability is imperceptible to the naked eye, yet they still want to discuss such conditions in the debate.

By that, I mean neurodivergent conditions one is born with (no matter how much anti-vaxxers deny it), such as autism, ADHD, and others. It's impossible to know if the child will be born with any of these conditions; there are no distinguishable physical characteristics. Why do they bring this up when pushing their narrative that "abortion is ableism"? It's impossible to know if the aborted fetus was autistic or not; even a newborn doesn't show these signs until 6 to 12 months of age, and an accurate diagnosis can only be made when the child is 4 to 6 years old.

¿And what happens with the opposite?, like even a LACK OF BRAIN ¿prolifes? ¿what do they want?. Not all of them but the most extreme and mentally fucked up ones want the messed up fetus to be birthed and steadily breath until it dies after few minutes of torture life.

This is not meant to attack artist who like to do that kind of content but I have the right to express my opinion

I dislike when female characters who are supposed to be paired with each other are drawn seducing the male character (or sometimes a genderless character but represented as male). It's worse when, in the process, they prefer to sexualize minors or incest, rather than a healthy lesbian couple. (I'm looking right at you, artist who drew Lace and Hornet in bikinis presenting themselves at the knight who doesn't show in the game except at the end without its shell)

Or even when the intention is to make it polyamorous, they make the girls interested in the guy but not interested in each other. Fuck, that's not polyamory, it looks like a damn 2girl harem.

A common argument I have seen from prolifes is that having children shouldn't stop women and going tru unwanted pregnancy makes them braver and stronger.