NOOTNOOTNOOTNOOT

Are they really just "anti-recovery" or is the treatment not actually helping? Are they really just "anti-recovery" or are they simply acknowledging that the treatment is making them worse? Are they really just "anti-recovery" or are they objecting to being harmed and abused in the name of treatment?

Are they "anti-recovery" or are they trying to have a conversation about how sometimes people stay sick for a long time no matter what they do and need things while being sick? Are they "anti-recovery" or do they just believe that bodily autonomy also applies to medical care, and that people should be able to opt out of one type of medical treatment (for any reason) without being denied medical care that they actually want? Are they "anti-recovery" or just making legitimate criticisms about the inaccurate assumption that a treatment nominally being available means it will work for everyone (and is affordable to everyone and...), and therefor if someone doesn't get healthier it means they haven't been trying?