Rural Anti-Extraction Movements Should Be Vehicles for Intersectional Alliances
Jamelle Bouie's article in Slate -  Why Democrats Can’t Win Over White Working-Class Voters - hit home with me today, when thinking about the organizing we're doing here in Lancaster County
The Democratic Party styles itself a fighter for the working class. But a substantial part of that class—the white part—wants nothing to do with it. If we count the white working class as whites without college degrees, then congressional Democrats lost them by 30 points in last week’s elections, contributing to losses in states as diverse as Iowa, Maine, Colorado, North Carolina, and Florida
Put another way, for a new rhetoric of populism to work—or at least, attract the winnable whites identified by Teixeira and Halpin—it needs to come with a commitment to universal policies that working-class whites like and support. (It’s no coincidence that the most liberal working-class whites belong to private and public sector unions.)
But the United States doesn’t have a political party to support that kind of social democracy. Instead, it has the Democratic Party, a collection of disparate interests which—at its best—is nervous about economic liberalism and hesitant to push anything outside the mainstream. And worse, it has a presidential frontrunner who—more than anyone else—is connected to the kinds of elites and the kinds of policies that would push the party away from the muscular liberalism it needs.
The Republican party takes advantage of white working class voters' very real fears of instability and hard times by fueling the fires of racism to alienate white people from other working people with whom they have the most in common.
Meanwhile, Democrats (& the left at large) dismiss white working class voters - either abandoning them outright as a lost cause & barrier to progress, or using classist language to shame them as uneducated, rednecks, hillbillies, or backwards. Thus leaving white working class folks all across America burning with resentment & fear, but without anyone articulating a way forward.
I believe rural anti-extraction movements - if positioned correctly - can have the power to build bridges across party lines, and bridge class & racial divides. The natural gas industry, in particular, is currently engaged in an unprecedented infrastructural expansion across the nation: building pipelines, power plants, export terminals and more through rural & urban working class communities.
Engagement in these struggles are avenues for white, working class Americans to express anger at an unjust system, and to develop trust, understanding, and compassion for all people who are engaged in struggle with them.Â
In Lancaster County, the fight against a natural gas pipeline is uniting people across party lines. Â Progressives & conservatives are engaged in common struggle. Â
What if our Lancaster County no-pipeline movement were to next build alliances with the people living where this gas will end: at the urban refineries, power plants, and export terminals? Â
What if we used populist, rights-based language that bridged the gap & spoke to a broad swath of people fighting against fossil fuel expansion, instead of just activists, environmentalists, or progressives?
White activists & organizers in the environmental, anti-extraction, and climate movements: We have a moral obligation to support white, working class communities fighting against extractive industries.  We need to walk alongside these movements with patience & compassion, and help to open up spaces for intersectional alliances. Â