CMC-S Exhibits Review - Nov 2016
Several observations lightly contradict previous posts. So it goes.
Some supplements fill in gaps, others support âcomplianceâ with SBAC. In other words, if you have a great curriculum, that isnât focused on test prep, then some practice with SBAC provides âclaim insurance.â
Mastery Education semi-adaptively provides SBAC questions to students online three times per week.
Nextgen Math provides a simple system for a teacher to select SBAC questions to show on Whiteboards or assign as online work. The âtest effectivenessâ of lessons is immediately shown as a result, which is important when unconventional approaches are used to obtain better learning.
With each school using different and several decade-old pre-calculus texts, it may be wise to update and standardize. Kendall-Huntâs Precalculus differentiates itself in two ways. First, it offers optional interactive activities, which makes it flow from our IMP approach more naturally. Admittedly, most pre-calc teachers believe that conventional approaches are more appropriate for a true college prep class, thatâs why the activities are optional. Surprisingly, these lessons work very well when a teacher is absent and substitutes cannot teach a standard lesson. Second, Kendall-Hunt can custom print a text for a districtâs particular curriculum. National Geographicâs Pre-Calc and new Calculus for AP textbooks have QR codes accessing online help on almost every problem page. This is an obvious, low-cost, tech-embedded solution. Consider a top student on a bus to an athletic event. Using her phone she can complete work.
The Statistics 1AB (M0364/M0365) text is over 10 years old. The new 3rd edition of Statistics and Probability with Applications is a substantial update. It strives harder to separate itself from AP Statistics texts. IMHO it would be appropriate to replace 1st edition texts with the 3rd edition.
If the one-year HMH 7-11 Go Math pilot gives only average âmehâ results, then an alternative pilot could start. With improvements to its middle school texts arriving next Spring, 6-11 or 7-11 Carnegie Learning should be considered. IMP would complement it well. Obviously other systems would work such as CMP, Springboard, UCLA MathLinks and Eureka. Happily, this decision is outside of my pay grade.
If the online component of a text is inadequate, but the text is acceptable, then ACTâs Open Ed at 2$/student for all subjects, including 300 NGSS simulations, may suffice as an alternative that would suit all teachers.
Quick Background on Textbooks
By far the most influential text of the past two decades is first edition Singapore Primary Math. Singapore Math was derived from German text(s). Itâs influence in the USA is found in âMath in Focusâ and Eureka Math, among others.Â
Pure Common Core Math compliance may not be wise. For example, money math isnât taught in CCM, but coins are great manipulatives that matter to children. Also, Singapore Math introduces multiplication in 1st grade as repeated addition. Try arguing against that. Lastly, the most debugged curriculum is Japanese Sansu Math. It completely ignores the Common Core, but requires intense teacher involvement.
If Newport-Mesa was only using UCI IMP and didnât want a supplemental textbook, then the maturing Learnzillion could complete the curriculum. This isnât advocating, but the product serves as a base for comparison to conventional curriculum. OpenEd or Gooru are competitors, but would require more effort to make a complete curriculum.
Canfigureit continues its âclaim-basedâ approach to Geometry proofs - a very Common Core approach. It should have easy-to-manage classroom features in early 2017.
Wootmath for 3-7 is maturing. Itâs interactive problems include built-in instruction and many classroom management tools. It is well-worth deeper use.
Quick Background on Software
With its superb adaptive design, ALEKS ranks with ST Math as the finest math software, if used in adaptive or sequential mode. For example, two products used in Newport-Mesa are Sokikom and Frontrow Math. If a teacher wants to assign particular sections for work, Frontrow works well, but if a teacher simply says work your way through it, Sokikomâs higher engagement delivers better learning results. Still, Frontrow may be more suitable for organizational teaching, which is what we do.
This complicates textbook software evaluation. IMHO assignment-based math software doesnât work as well as âwork your way through itâ software. Use math software as a âparallelâ curriculum, not just as online worksheets with feedback.
This may seem to be a dull and old topic, but it is still alive. If all 7th through Math 2 students used a 13$ Casio ES-300 Plus with a natural display and uncommon functions like âRemainderâ or âFactors,â students could work in conceptual math more effectively and consistently.
The TI-84 rules the market, but for $100 from Bach (ask for it), the test-compliant HP Prime with a touch screen and classroom wireless for easy transmission of data and student screens (eg basketball shots for student tracing of parabola) offers high value. Itâs possible that in the Spring Casio may offer a new, test-compliant model that actually may change what advanced math teachers want to use.
Of course, graphing calculators are obsolete. Online software like Desmos is far superior, but the SAT, ACT, and AP have rules....