thereās something to be said about the jarring inaccessibility of information regarding the permanence in the data bank, especially considering its fervent upkeep by a scion of long themselves.
i donāt think many people realize just how wide the disparity is, either:
granted, i made this sometime right after 3.6, so i mightāve glossed over some of the more more recent developments for other aeons. either way, though, the fact remains that we have nothing (and thereās a lot of reasons why this is Weird, but itās a bit of a hefty read, so i apologize in advance).
first of all, it has nothing to do with long being (allegedly) a fallen aeon, nor with the permanence being a so-called āinactive pathā ā the data bank has entries for the order, trailblaze, and propagation; idrila has their own entry; several of these paths have associated factions with designated data bank entries; etc. plus, dan heng values recording information abt concepts or places regardless of whether they still exist/will exist in the future, and says that he likes to compare and contrast those records with existing ones.
beyond that, the claim that dan heng simply doesnāt know enough about the permanence, or āisnāt comfortableā writing about it, is total bs on SO many levels. i mean, he literally regards his aeonic ancestor as āthe great longā and rather proudly proclaims its powers to be inseparable from himself (read: DHPT ult voice line; basically all of the 3.6 story; etcā¦), not to mention that he didnāt author all of its contents; iām really not sure where this misconception came from, but dan heng did not write everything in the data bank!!!! long is one of the oldest aeons to date, and THEY left behind several branches of scions, of which at least two are known to be humanoid (aka capable of regular communication). how is it that, in all the time since THEIR death, nothing has been recorded about this path by the innumerable generations of nameless that have come before?
well, funny enough, thatās because it actually isnāt the case ā the recorded information just isnāt accessible to us. for example, dhilās greeting voice line explicitly tells us of a vidyadharan custom recorded in the data bank, which implies not only the existence of an independent entry, but also that heās committed it to memory (and possibly even wrote it). thatās not even the extent of his internalized knowledge; in one of the time-limited anniversary events, there was some conditional dialogue where the TB quizzes dan heng on details in the data bank. in one of the options, you get to ask him about the species of the infernalians (another branch of longās scions), to which he replies, āthey are of the draconis subspecies, same as the vidyadhara.ā so we know that the data bank has info about:
-the vidyadhara, including the name of their subspecies and cultural practices
-the infernalians, including the name of their subspecies
so, yeah, itās not a matter of him not having the information; the knowledge is quite literally there. WE just canāt see it, for whatever reason.
also, heās absolutely recorded his own thoughts, collective speculations and arguments, etc. in his entries before ā despite his desire for objectivity, he seems to value providing context for future reference above all else; personal experience definitely constitutes as a valid form of information for the data bank in his eyes. for instance, his first entry for the pure children of anÄsrava (note that it updates after the completion of a specific tb mission, so for anyone up to date on the gameās story, itās no longer available) included whatās essentially an internal monologue where he just. kinda questions their existence.
you can read it for yourself here:
like, dan heng literally states that he isnāt sure whether the entry should be included at all, because it was (at the time) based on very unreliable information. if it were truly a lack of credible info preventing his usual record-keeping, weād still be seeing some semblance of proof of their existence in the archives, but we donāt.
ALSO, speaking of the pcoa, that entry was written and made available during the same patch they were introduced!! meanwhile, the vidyadhara have been an established race/faction since 1.0; we were informed of more branches of longās scions in 1.3, which is also when we got our second (*technically* third) playable character of said race; there have been multiple focused arcs which touched specifically on the vidyadhara ā one of which took up the better half of 3.6 ā and yet we still donāt have even a summary of their lore? the timing of that honestly solidified my suspicionsā had hoyo simply forgotten to add their entry (listen, benefit of the doubt), it wouldāve been a perfect opportunity to reintroduce that information ā but they didnāt. this is 100% intentional, but i canāt figure out why theyād do it like this.
sure, itās building up to future development for the path, but the same can be said for just about all of them. we have less information about the finality, for example, than we do the permanence, and both are undoubtedly āendgameā story arcs, so to speakā yet only the latter has records available to us currently.
i have many thoughts about this, but iāve said a lot already; thank you to anyone who got this far. iāll post more about this in the future, but iām always open to discussions in comments/reblogs/DMs if anyone is interested.













