i need to thank william moseley for the acting decisions he made 20years ago bc this peter/edmund stuff right here changed my brain chemistry

tannertan36

Love Begins

Product Placement

PR's Tumblrdome
KIROKAZE

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

@theartofmadeline

Origami Around

ellievsbear
Cosmic Funnies
Doug Jones

pixel skylines
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
d e v o n
Today's Document
Phantogram Three
Sweet Seals For You, Always
The Bowery Presents
almost home
seen from Canada
seen from Mexico
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Poland

seen from Türkiye

seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
@nerdynonnativenarnian
i need to thank william moseley for the acting decisions he made 20years ago bc this peter/edmund stuff right here changed my brain chemistry

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Just because you did something wrong in the past doesn’t mean you can’t advocate against it now. It doesn’t make you a hypocrite. You just grew. Don’t let people use your past to invalidate your current mindset.
Bruh. This needs to be a mandatory post on everybody’s blog. Y'all really be pullin out decade old receipts like woah.
Either you want people to grow and change or you want people to stay evil villains soyou can feel superior as you shame them.
This was too good to leave in the tags.
It’s a quote from the Stormlight Archives–from a man who is a hypocrite, because he in the process of rising to become a better man after having fallen.
[Image ID: Text reading: “Sometimes a hypocrite is nothing more than than a man in the process of changing.”, /End ID]
Warning / PSA for my fellow Christians
Just ran into my first slop AI "Bible verse" that was just fully, completely made up.
When you spot a verse you don't have memorized floating around in the wild, make sure you doublecheck it.
Be prepared for people to start citing these things, believing these things. Be prepared for some tough conversations.
And, uh, maybe stick with using your grandma's old copy instead of buying new for a while....
You can use Bible gateway free online to check multiple versions/translations to be sure it’s fake and not just a different version than the one your used too, there quite a few of them
Deregulation just means a shittier version.
“If abortions are murder, then that means every time someone intentionally kills an unborn human being is murder!” … yes that’s the whole point
Me at the second degree murder trial of a man who caused a miscarriage by beating a pregnant woman:
Was that supposed to be a gotcha or something?? Like yeah dude, that is obviously also murder
They’re so married to the idea that anyone pro-life is this woman hating Handmaid‘s Tale POS that they just don’t bother thinking things through. Like oh well if she can’t kill the baby then you can’t give her five across the eyes.
"If we can't kill babies then you can't beat pregnant women!"
Uh, yeah. Those sound like perfectly acceptable terms to me.
I would like to point out that fetal homicide laws already exist. In 38 states and several countries if you assault a pregnant woman and cause a miscarriage you can be charged with murder.
Girl what a fucking tweet… oh won’t someone think of the poor POS men… I was FORCED to beat her because anti-abortion laws prevented me from coercing her into aborting :-( it’s not my fault it’s the fault of meanie pro-lifers
Like I’ve met some freaky pro-life men who imo would very much like to make the handmaid’s tale a reality… but there are many pro-choice men cut from the same cloth, they also like controlling women, that’s one of the reasons they support abortion lmao
Im not even pro-life and I think this
Killing someone, even the unborn, is murder. How is this so difficult to grasp?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“If abortions are murder, then that means every time someone intentionally kills an unborn human being is murder!” … yes that’s the whole point
Me at the second degree murder trial of a man who caused a miscarriage by beating a pregnant woman:
Was that supposed to be a gotcha or something?? Like yeah dude, that is obviously also murder
They’re so married to the idea that anyone pro-life is this woman hating Handmaid‘s Tale POS that they just don’t bother thinking things through. Like oh well if she can’t kill the baby then you can’t give her five across the eyes.
"If we can't kill babies then you can't beat pregnant women!"
Uh, yeah. Those sound like perfectly acceptable terms to me.
I would like to point out that fetal homicide laws already exist. In 38 states and several countries if you assault a pregnant woman and cause a miscarriage you can be charged with murder.
It is easy to think writing only becomes real when someone reads it, likes it, comments on it, publishes it, buys it, validates it. But the work already mattered when you made it. You practiced attention. You built a scene from nothing. You turned a feeling into language. You learned one tiny thing about craft. An audience can give the work a second life, yes. But the first life happens when you sit down and make it.
Underused Ways to Show Two Characters Have History
Everyone writes: “We’ve known each other for years!"
But we can do better than that—let's make things actually interesting.
Here are some quick tips for writing two characters with history (without saying, "we've known each for years"):
• They reach for the same object at the same time without looking
• One of them uses a nickname no one else is allowed to use
• They start arguing mid-conversation like the first half already happened
• They move closer when the other looks uncomfortable
• One of them says, “Don’t start,” before the other has said anything
• They know exactly which buttons to press (and press them immediately)
• They unconsciously drift toward each other in crowded spaces
• They anticipate each other’s reactions before they happen
• One quietly moves something (a drink, weapon, chair) because they know the other will reach for it
• Someone might say something, and the other immediately responds with: “You’re still doing that?”
• They suppress laughter at the same time over something no one else noticed
• One character still treats the other based on who they used to be
• A certain place, smell, or song causes them to exchange a look
• Their arguments sound rehearsed, like they’ve had them before
• They touch each other casually without asking (fixing clothing, nudging, taking something from their hand)
• They stand closer than strangers normally would
• They borrow items from each other
• They bring up something embarrassing from ten years ago
• They sit in silence together and it’s either very comfortable or extremely tense
• One of them automatically orders the other’s drink
• They interrupt each other and still somehow finish the same sentence
• One starts a story and the other finishes it automatically
• They argue about the details of shared memories
• They mention people or events without explaining them
• A simple phrase or nickname triggers an entire inside joke
• They notice tiny things about each other no one else would catch
Real history sounds like unfinished conversations, old habits, and arguments that never really ended. When you show shared history (instead of telling) your characters seem that much more alive and believable.
On a similar note: Not all shared history is comfortable. Sometimes shared history means unresolved tension or an old rivalry:
• They refer to something only as “that” or “before.”
• Someone says “You know why.” without explaining further
• Standing slightly farther apart than expected
• Fingers drumming or fidgeting when they’re forced to talk
• Avoiding eye contact for just a second too long.
• A small disagreement suddenly becomes heated.
• One character reacts sharply to something that shouldn’t matter anymore.
• A casual comment triggers silence or defensiveness.
• One character starts explaining themselves but trails off
• One character makes small, cutting remarks disguised as jokes
• They still know each other’s preferences or weaknesses
• They speak in fragments when the past comes up
• They fall into familiar conversations and then awkwardly break them
If you enjoy digging into character dynamics like this, my printable novel planner has detailed sections for relationships, character arcs, and story structure. It’s perfect for organizing a fanfic or mapping out an entire novel!
⤷ my printable novel planner
YES THIS
If you notice me reblogging
a repost
stolen art
false information
etc.
please let me know, you’re not rude or annoying and I actually do give a fuck and I will correct my mistake, thank you

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Genuinely scared because what if all the guys I like think that girls should only be friends with girls and then don’t want to date me unless I cut out all male friends or acquaintances?
Sometimes I worry about this too, but we could also just refuse to lower our standards.
Because men can be better than this. They are human, and humans were made to be wiser and kinder than that. It insults the glorious creativity of God to say that men are incapable of befriending women without ulteriour motives.
And because we are people. And people shouldn't be isolated. We were made to be social creatures. We were made to let our light shine, rather than hide our light under a bushel.
And because love is as love does, and must be founded upon respect to be at all sustainable for anyone. Isolation is both fundamentally harmful to people and makes it much more difficult for people to get a read on reality and figure out what is and is not ok. Plus it makes it harder to build up a decent life for oneself. Christ demonstrated a love that understands, hopes, and builds up the beloved, rather than chains them to Him. Jesus knew Judas walk away from the Last Supper and did not try to stop him.
And because the men we marry become our life partners through every major life-decision, gaining access to our finances, becoming fathers to any children we have, choosing when, where, and whether to move to different places. Would a man like that raise his daughters to respect themselves or his sons to become virtuous? Regardless of whether you want to be a parent or not, your health, well-being, and life-span are all heavily affected by who you choose to build your life with, and no one who cannot respect and trust you enough to make your own friendships is worthy of trusting with your life like that.
Just because we *could* date and marry men, doesn't mean that we should feel like we *have* to date and marry men. We can refuse. Nuns do it all the time, and nuns are awesome! If I was Catholic, I would probably be a nun, but my sect (Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints) prefers not to have sharp distinctions between the laity and the church. We can build families, support community-members, and be important role models for kids in other ways.
Besides, who wants to be chosen just because they were the least bad option? Heterofatalism is drearily unromantic as well as a path to dangerous situations.
If we meet men who meet our standards, then we'll have made fine matches, but until that day, we needn't pour our lives into any spouse who wouldn't do the same for us. Marriage should be an equal partnership rather than a donation. Both partners can better live and let their light shine as a team rather than as objects.
They're his children of course. Richard still recognizes them; it's only been two years.
And yet...
Peter is a man. Still six months shy of his draft papers, but he stands, walks, sounds like a man. He always has a pocket knife, he tips his hat to all the females, he sings in a baritone that will only get deeper and richer. The tea he makes is decent, but sometimes he drinks coffee now. He talks about horses and crops and reads Augustine. He can drive a car. He gives orders, and expects them to be followed.
They all look to him, to Peter. Helen calls him to open a jar, Susan questions how her hair looks, Lucy runs to him in tears. As for Edmund, he and Peter are curiously joined, they turn to each other with their laughter, their thoughts, their books and newspapers and letters. As often as his family swirls around him, Richard sees them swirl around Peter, a habit, he knows, born of necessity, but that doesn't prevent it from being strange. Even painful.
Peter moves to take the head of table, catches himself. They both start to say grace, stop, glance at each other. Peter takes the newspaper over breakfast, and is a page in before he remembers. And every time he apologises. Each time he smiles at his father, and it is warm, glad, even benevolent.
One of the first nights, shortly after Christmas, Peter finds him sitting in his old armchair, staring into the fire, after everyone else has gone up to bed. "Dad?" comes the question, and he looks up blinking at the tall man, lamplight crowning him in gold, blue eyes deep and dark with knowledge and certainty.
"I'm not who I was," Richard says, a confession, the kind a father shouldn't burden his son with he thinks immediately, but then Peter is down on one knee, reaching for the mangled hand, tender with the three fingers as he clasps strong calloused palms around them.
"Neither am I, Dad. None of us are." Peter's gaze is earnest, bright. "But you are still my father. And I will always be your son. I am forever grateful for that."
It is as if a great burden rolls off of his shoulders, and he finds no shame in leaning on Peter's hand to rise.
When the holidays end, and the four go back to school, Peter says I love you to each of them at the station.
If Peter is a man now, Susan is a lady.
She sits straight, she walks gracefully, she can cook anything as well or better than her mother. She reads the newspapers with Peter, she scolds Lucy for coming home with twigs in her hair and a tear in her stocking and wet shoes.
She talks less than her father remembers, and there is a woman's sadness in her gazing out the window or into the fire. She is also very admiring of the boys in uniforms, and Richard requests her arm on the way out of church with a father's righteous sense of protection.
But she is also gentler than he recalls, she does not shy away from his injured hand, she takes care of him without making him feel as if he needs care. She sits on a cushion by his feet as she braids her hair in the evenings, leans on his knee as she reads aloud, and Richard thinks, Not my little princess, but a queen now.
At the train station, she kisses him goodbye, and he hugs her close, and there are tears in her eyes as she says I love you.
Edmund is the closest to unrecognizable, the once-obvious four year span between he and Peter seemingly halved. He greets his father wordlessly, all shining eyes and bright smile, and his face is so close to Richard's own it makes his heart break a little.
Ed is no more little boy, he is tall, slim, oddly graceful, but his handclasp is strong. He holds himself the same way Peter does, with squared shoulders and lifted head, but he wears that nobility in a quieter fashion. He's quick to see, quick to hear, quick with a wisecrack that makes Peter laugh out loud. He plays the violin now. He returns the family Bible to the living room with an apology for having kept it since the summer holidays. He reads Agatha Christie as a personal challenge, whispers to Susan in French, and his chess games with Peter are fierce battles of strategy that Richard cannot keep pace with.
In discussions of the war and its movements, he is sober and considerate, he meets each of Peter's moods with a balancing counter, he has a way of phrasing questions that pull out stories Richard had never planned to tell.
A few nights before the children return to school, Richard sits up in bed, certain he has heard a faint cry, and he slips away from his exhausted wife to check on his children, remembering how Edmund had suffered from night terrors as a child, imagining little Lucy inflicted with some dark dream.
But all he finds is shadows in the boys' room, and quiet whispers—Peter's apologies, Edmund's reassurance, and allusions to things Richard has no context for. He lingers by the door, an outsider in his home, until silence falls, and he returns with morning light to find them curled together in Peter's bed, Pete with an arm over Ed, and the father's love is bittersweet.
They have fought their own battle over here, on the home ground, Richard reminds himself. In their own way they have each faced terror and learned to conquer or be conquered, but perhaps he can meet them somewhere in between. Only time will tell.
On the train platform, Ed hugs his father tightly, gives him a smile, tells him to keep out of trouble.
Lucy is the least changed, though she too is taller and stronger, and her eyes are deeper. She still sings, still dances, still tries to make friends with all the animals, still smiles and speaks kind and stares dreaming at the Christmas tree.
She still gives fierce hugs, still climbs into her father's lap, though her head comes up higher on his chest, on his shoulder.
But then he finds gaps in his library, and Lucy returns the medical books with a winsome apology, she asks questions about his practices in the field, she winces but does not shy away from the blood and broken things he speaks of.
Then she recites long poems, words spinning off her tongue until they become half song; she dances swift and graceful, she and Peter laughing and stepping and clapping and spinning in intricate patterns to the swing song on the radio; and it is she who, breathless, quotes Byron: "On with the dance! Let joy be unconfined!"
Her comfort is both generous and thoughtful, and she strokes her father's hair with a motherly hand that makes his eyes sting, and he kisses her fingers, looks up at her to whisper, "Don't- don't grow up quite so fast, my darling."
When she hugs him on the platform, Susan waiting for her, the boys already gone, she doesn't want to let go, and there are tears on her cheek, that he wipes away gently. "Be careful, Daddy," she whispers. "Get strong. Take care of Mummy."
"Yes, little mother," he smiles back.
And then they are all gone, and he takes a cab home, weary of his still-recovering body.
He will have to learn his children all over again, he thinks. But he is proud of them still. That has not changed.
✨Blaschko’s lines ✨
I like the idea of Duke having visible Blaschko’s lines that became visible once he got his powers. Since they’re possibly due to cell migration patterns (I think), and Duke’s got freaky meta god blood, they might be a little different and glow when he uses his powers! I think I was also just thinking of freckles showing up when ur in the sun.
yooo. headcanon accepted
10 Ways to Show Grief Without Making Your Character Cry
Grief doesn't always look like crying. Here are some ideas for how to realistically portray it outside of the ‘screaming, crying, throwing up’ phase.
1. Burying Themselves in Work or School: Suddenly the most productive they've ever been, taking on extra shifts, extra assignments, anything that keeps their hands and mind too busy to land on the actual loss.
2. Avoiding Anywhere That Reminds Them of the Person: A restaurant, a route they used to walk together, an entire side of town. They'll go out of their way and never explain why, and probably won't even clock it as avoidance themselves.
3. Refusing to Change Anything of Theirs: The room stays exactly as it was. The voicemail doesn't get deleted. Moving even one object can feel like erasing them, so nothing moves at all.
4. Overcompensating With Normalcy: Laughing a little too readily, insisting they're fine a little too often. This one's great for a character who thinks showing grief means burdening the people around them.
5. Picking Fights With People Trying to Help: Grief makes people prickly in strange directions. Someone offering comfort can genuinely feel unbearable, and lashing out is sometimes easier than admitting they need it.
6. Taking Care of Everyone Else's Grief Instead of Their Own: Comforting siblings, managing funeral logistics, checking in on everyone but themselves. Tip: this one's especially good for an oldest-sibling or caretaker-type character, since it lets them delay their own grief almost indefinitely.
7. Sudden Reckless Behavior: Driving too fast, drinking too much, taking risks they never would have before. It's less about wanting to get hurt and more about needing to feel something other than the numbness.
8. An Obsessive Need for Control: Rigid routines, excessive cleaning, rearranging things that don't need rearranging. When one massive thing feels completely out of their control, controlling everything else becomes the coping mechanism.
9. Talking About Them in Present Tense: "She loves this song," not "loved." A small grammatical slip that says more about where their head still is than an entire monologue would.
10. Taking Up Something the Person Loved: Picking up their guitar, rewatching their favorite show, cooking their recipes. It's a way of keeping them present without having to say out loud that they're gone.
Looking For More Writing Tips And Tricks?
Check out the rest of Quillology with Haya; a blog dedicated to writing and publishing tips for authors!
TikTok | Instagram
why do so many freaks go right to “there should be exams or tests before you have kids” when the real solution is better social services, robust infant and child development education that is accessible both financially and schedule/distance accommodating, and resources throughout any stage of a child’s life. genuine question like did you think about any social development before going straight to eugenics

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Some doodles for my headcanon that Toph attracts animals because she's steady and strong like the Earth and they feel super comfortable and safe around her. Kinda like basking in the sun on a steady mountain top Also a sadder one on how she bonds with Appa over a shared experience :)
Only a few years ago they invented a new dogwhistle every week because they were bored and ran out of people to cancel.
Now in the modern day, the same people are commenting in broad daylight, "Hitler was right".
It was NEVER about caring about the feelings of Jewish people or protecting them.
It was ALWAYS about finding the worst possible word to call the person you didn't like in order to justify abusing them.
All it took was a narrative shift and the people who tried to cancel garden gnomes became real actual Nazis OVERNIGHT.
NEVER FORGET THIS.
If you ever for a MOMENT even THINK that you'll be "fine" under mass surveillance because you "aren't doing anything wrong".
Or that you're "safe" from cancel culture because all of your opinions are "good, progressive, and correct".
If "who's the good guy" of Jews vs. Nazis can flip, NOBODY IS SAFE.