Random headcanon: in Cybertronian languages, they have different verb forms to indicate whether somethingâs being done in robot mode, vehicle mode, or by something that only has one mode.
So you could say âHe flew,â but there are three different forms of âflew,â so you can tell if the âheâ is someone in robot-mode, someone in jet-mode, or a bird or plane or comet or some shit.
Among other things, this means that depending on if itâs the Robot, Vehicle, or Other verb, someone speaking a Cybertronian language can imply transformation without having to state it. So, someone could say âHe flew(V) to the building and then he landedÂŽ on the roof,â the changes in the verb form imply that he transformed before he landed.
The verb forms for âtransformâ match the initial state, not the ultimate state. So, if youâre tranforming from Robot to Vehicle mode, you have to use transformÂŽ rather than transform(V). So, âHe flew(V), transformed(V), and then landedÂŽâ would be proper grammar, because heâs a Vehicle transforming into a Robot; âHe flew(V), transformedÂŽ, and then landedÂŽâ would be improper grammar.
The Other verb form of âtransformâ is all but obsolete, because a non-robot non-vehicle thing canât transform. Like you can use that form if you want but you sound kinda dumb and nobody knows what youâre talking about because it doesnât make sense. Itâs like saying âthe silence jumped.â Grammatically correct, logically nonsensical.
They have different verbs for transform-as-in-like-a-Transformer and for transform-as-in-anything-else. And transform-as-in-anything-else has V, R, and O forms, obviously. Itâs just transform-like-a-Transformer that only has V and R forms used.
Ohhhh, I love this concept.















