Like most things marbled murrelet, the path for the species’ survival is unique.  The issue revolves around the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR), a somewhat obscure and incredibly misunderstood agency which has the task of managing our state forests to bring in long-term revenue for our state schools and some counties.  It is important to note that DNR does not view the forests it manages as “our state forests”, but rather as the beneficiaries’ (the schools and counties), and therefore DNR’s, state trust land forests.  Other than land which has specifically been put into permanent conservation status, which is a very small percentage of the total DNR-managed forestland, the state forests which are so important to our clean air and water, carbon sequestration, recreational opportunities, and forest-dwelling species’ habitat are eligible to be logged once they reach 60 or 70 years old.  DNR is not in the business of saving endangered species, it is in the logging business.  Â
However, after the marbled murrelet was listed as Threatened on the federal Endangered Species List in 1992 and after DNR signed a Habitat Conservation Plan agreement with US Fish & Wildlife Service in 1997, saving the marbled murrelet became DNR’s business, as the agreement permitted DNR to continue to log within the marbled murrelet’s range as long as DNR develop and then implement the necessary scientific knowledge about the marbled murrelet’s (previously unknown) ecological needs in order to create a Long-Term Conservation Strategy which would guide DNR’s forest management in the marbled murrelet’s range for the next 60-70 years.  7 years after this agreement was signed, in 2004, DNR commissioned a team of scientific all-stars, the top marbled murrelet researchers in the Pacific Northwest, to gather the data and recommend science-based actions to be included in the Long-Term Conservation Strategy.  The information and recommendations came out 4 years later, in what is known as the 2008 Science Report.  Although DNR praised the Science Report at the time, the Department has been distancing itself from the Science Report and its recommendations ever since due to a belief that the plan would forfeit too much timber revenue.  And now, in 2015, the process is finally moving forward once more into the final stages, the actual creation of the Long-Term Conservation Strategy (LTCS).  In the even more immediate future, the Alternatives, or options, for the LTCS are expected to be announced in October  There are 4 possible directions the LTCS could take, and Murrelet Survival Project and most conservation groups are advocating for one of those Alternatives, and ultimately the LTCS, to be based on the 2008 Science Report. Â
Yes, the Science Report is 7 years old now.  But that is largely due to the DNR’s negligence and other issues (DNR blames the recession), and there has not been any major research done on the marbled murrelet since then, and certainly not any specific to the potential recovery of the population in Washington state.  The Science Report was the most comprehensive and relevant report on the marbled murrelet when it was released in 2008, and it still is today, and even though 7 years have passed since the Science Report’s release, the fact that a third of Washington’s murrelet population has disappeared since then tells us that we need the conservation-minded, science-based approach the Science Report recommendations have to offer.  There are no other recommendations or science reports from top murrelet researchers on how DNR can contribute to the recovery of Washington’s marbled murrelet population, and as far as I know, the only scientists DNR and the Board hear from are on the DNR payroll (although several of their top researchers were on the Science Team behind the 2008 Science Report).  DNR claims to making its decisions based on sound science but we can clearly see the lack of recent research published by DNR on the marbled murrelet, and its own top scientists (at least in 2008) directly contributed to the Science Report.  The conservation community is willing to consider any science-based conservation strategy with recovery as the primary objective, but because there is no other comprehensive research to guide the LTCS and with a 5% annual population decline in our state, the Science Report is the only Alternative that can truly be based on sound science and therefore needs to become the Long-Term Conservation Strategy.