Week 10 : Social Media Governance
The Dark Side ....
Digital communities are often assumed to be entirely good, unproblematic and inclusive. This is the complete opposite of majority of digitisation , mainly social media platforms. Social media increasingly plays a role in conflict and contentious environments (Zeitzoff, 2017).
Social media governance is a framework which regulates the actions of the members of an organization within the social web ( Linkie & Zerfass, 2013). Social media governance looks at how the internet runs. Social media governance explores a set of conflicting interests such as commercial interests, public sector and industry bodies who develop standards. Governance also takes place at the micro level including Facebook groups and subreddits.
Online harassment is a growing issue on social media, leading social media governance to act. Online harassment encompasses a wide range of violent behaviours in the online space , including cyberbullying characterized by recurring attacks ( Farley et. Al, 2021). Online harassment can take many forms , such as spreading malicious rumours, sending abusive direct messages and non-consensual sharing of personal content. Harassing behaviour is often networked in that it is coordinated and organized. Network harassment such as doxing , image based abuse , social shaming and intimidation were refine by men's activist and anti-feminist gaming ( Jane et. Al, 2023). Until recently , there was no single piece of Australian legislation against bullying or online abuse. The Criminal Code Act 1995 regulates conduct in society to protect the community and provide sanctions against crimes.
This week's reading explored an insight into today's generation's impact to online harassment. The toleration of harassment in the UK has labelled young people a snowflake generation ( Haslop et. Al, 2021). Snow flake is a term used to mock their perceived intolerance and easily offended nature, following the hashtag #NoSnowFlakes (Nicholson, 2016). Describing young people as 'think-skinned' and 'mentally fragile' (Pinkstone, 2018).
References :
Alharbi, R , Funwie, A , Gankhuu, T & Gilbert, E & Grill, G & Im, J & Iriarte, M & Naseem, M & Schoenerbeck , S & Wilkinson, D 2023, 'Womens perspectives on Harm and justice after online harassment', Arxiv, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1-23.
Celuch, M & Savela, N, Oksa, R, Latikka, R & Okasanen 2022, 'Individual factors predicting reactions to online harassment among Finnish professionals', Science Direct, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 1-12.
Haslop, C & O'Rourke, F & Southern , R 2021, '#NoSnowflakes : The toleration of harassment and an emergent gender-related digital divide, in a UK student online culture', Convergence, vol. 5, no. 27, pp. 1418-1438
Linke, A & Zerfass, A 2013, 'Social Media Governance : Regulatory frameworks for successful online communications', Research Gate, vol. 3, no. 17, pp. 5-8.
Zeitzoff, T 2017, 'How Social Media Is Changing Conflict', Sage Journals, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1-10.


















