What do these artist have in common? All three of these artists are famous and rebels at their time. Kathe Kollwitz made art that could be reproduced and reprinted during the time Hitler was burning culture which included books and art. Andy Warhol created pop art artworks which changed the image of current traditional art. And Damien Hirst conceptualized ideas into his manufactured artworks and push the boundaries for Contemporary Art.
What they also have in common is that they made a lot of money from just selling their artworks. In order to make that money they chose methods of art that enabled them to mass produce art and especially for Warhol and Hirst they used assistants and manufactures to help produce their work.
These successful and famous artists push the boundaries of "One of a kind" art and yet still make money from it. Damien Hirst employs other people to make his artworks, and is the most successful artist of our time. So questioning if contemporary art today is made from the artist him/herself or is it created by the conceptual idea?.
And if it isn't art when an artist employs other people to create their art. What is brand names in fashion? Is it Chanel if it wasn't directly made by Chanel, of course we don't question it because it's apart of society today. So if an artist chooses methods of mass production will it be valuable or desirable and can they still make art after death?.
Kathe Kollwitz photo is from http://myphototeacher.com/bc/CurrentFunArt/Artists/Page3/Kathe%20Kollwitz/Self%20Portaits/SelfPort.html
Damien Hirst photo is from http://www.sydneycool.com.au/2012/06/damien-hirst-tate-modern-london/
Andy Warhol photo is from http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#mediaviewer/File:Andy_Warhol_by_Jack_Mitchell.jpg













