I hate that people keep pretending that trans menβs being men isnβt related at all to their oppression.
If a trans man werenβt a man, he wouldnβt be trans.
His claiming of man as his gender is the exact thing he is being oppressed for.
This is how intersectionality as a framework is supposed to be used to look at this, not, βman doesnβt add another oppressive force.β
And before I get, βbut if man doesnβt add an oppressive force, how can the oppression be intersectional. Isnβt that just transphobia now?β
Thatβs still a huge misunderstanding of intersectionality, and Iβm not sure Iβm going to be able to be the one to help here.
But simply, the best try I have, is that the patriarchy and sexism still create something else which oppresses trans men that isnβt βjust transphobiaβ. It targets them specifically for claiming manhood, as well as for anatomy they may have been born with as trans men which society uses to see them as being not men, and social knowledge of them βhaving been a womanββ¦
Manhood doesnβt add protection for trans men except in the extreme circumstance of being absolutely stealth (as in youβve managed to have a life where no one you have to interact with for the rest of your life will ever be able to figure out that youβre trans, and youβve cut off anyone who knew you pre-transition).
And it fascinates me that people like to claim that non-passingness means that trans men will be seen as precious little girl flowers who are cherished. Because often we have mixed sex characteristics. And intersex people and trans women talk extensively about how having mixed sex characteristics is dangerous. But weβre never thought of as having mixed sex characteristics, only as perfectly stealth or pre-everything. And why is it that stealthing privilege is considered for trans men, but not trans women?
Oh, because women are oppressed anyway so they canβt be safe really? Okay then why are pre-everything trans men so safe? If a person who is assumed a woman is actually a trans man, thatβs someone who will be treated as harmless and beautiful, and if that person assumed to be a woman is actually a trans woman, that someone will still be at the mercy of misogynists? How does that work? Are we really doing a fucking βthey can always tellβ?
Or maybe itβs that a trans man can state that heβs a man and the oppression would stop? I can tell you that the opposite is true; that asserting youβre a man when someone has assumed youβre a woman and is mistreating you for that, only gets you treated worse. And again, why is this something only available to trans men? Can people not lie to try to be safer? Is that not what stealthing and closeting are to a degree?
Anyway, that got a little off the rails from my original point. But it does show the absolute absurdity that you have to accept to disbelieve a marginalized community trying to speak on the oppression they face.