Experiment 1 - Audience = Artist
For Assessment 1, I created a collaborative poster that encouraged audiences to become the artists. This was done by simply making edits to the poster by crossing out boxes. Making the poster interactive and engaging is what made it interesting and collaborative.Â
For my first experiment, I decided to explore this activity furthermore by getting audiences to create artworks together using a variety of mediums.
I first experimented using Adobe Illustrator, a graphic technology software that is used by industry professionals to produce digital artworks. This experiment was very informal as I instructed the participants to draw whatever they wanted.Â
I did this experiment at my workplace during my break periods. I got my workmates who were also on their breaks to take part in this experiment.
The participants didn’t work on the artwork together. They each took turns on my laptop drawing whatever came to their mind.Â
note** I didn’t take photos of them drawing on my laptop as they expressed their disinterest in having their photo being taken in the workplace.
The first person had a blank canvas, so they had the flexibility of drawing whatever they wanted to draw.
Every person after added minor details to the image, which limits their creative potential in the work as they didn’t have the ability to freely draw anything like the first person.
My second attempt at this experiment was done at uni. I was able to get a few friends + myself to participate in this activity.
Using clay/plasticine, the participants were encouraged to create whatever they wanted to make using as much clay as they wanted.
note** I forgot to take images of the clay pieces gradually evolving. Instead, I only have the first stage and the final stage. I was however able to get some action shots.
My third and final attempt at this experiment was using the medium of wire. Before I got people to start making the sculptural piece, I decided to make a base. Because I am stingy and poor, I decided to use two cork heat pads from K-Mart as the base. Using this, I put them on top of each other and drilled two holes into the cork boards. I then cut a long piece of PVC wire, inserted each of the ends in the holes and made a knot at the bottom so that the wire will not fall out.Â
I then got my two sisters as well as my dad to make a sculptural wire piece.Â
This experiment is to represent the dynamics of collaborative projects and works. It is evident that within the group, there is a leader (whether or not they are established as the leader of the pack) that steers/directs the project. Normally, this person is the one that came up with the idea. This leader is represented by the first person who tackled the work as they had the flexibility to do whatever they wanted to do. The other participants could only add on to what has already been assembled, however, their creative potential is only limited to what is in front of them. This represents the other members of the collaborative project, who complete tasks that support the idea of the leader.Â
Challenge - conflicting ideas; the supporting cast members propose ideas that alter the envisioned image of another person (affect)
Solution - compromise; conflict resolution. Most scenarios, a suggestion is beneficial to the final work.Â
How it was represented - the act of people adding on to the work = different suggestions into making the collaborative project better. The design process represents the idea of conflict resolution; how the work evolved from the ideas put forth by each participant.
Challenge - superiority and inferiority: the ‘leader’ has a bigger role in making the work. Other collaborators are just a supporting cast, helping the ‘leader’ deliver their message
Solution - this statement is absolutely false. Even if it is not your idea in the first place, it does not mean that you do not have a pivotal role in the creation of the work. You can still make an impact (propose ideas that could slightly change the idea, making it better). It is your work as much as it is theirs.
How it was represented - the process itself; each person adding on to the sculpture = people proposing new ideas to the collaborative piece that could improve the work.
Overall, the 3 components of this experiment explores the concept of collaboration. It demonstrates how when collaborating with others, the contrasting ideas put forth by the collaborators affects the way you look at the work. It also looks at the dynamics of collaborative projects; particularly the how ideas typically stem from an idea put forth by an individual, and is expanded on by other collaborators.Â
At the end of the day, the work promotes the idea of making the audience the artist. By creating a single work with other artists, they are collaborating with each other, thus, building a community as they share the commonality of having made an artwork together.
Although I believe that this experiment successfully answered the research question, I do not believe that this project is strong enough to be submitted as my final work. This is because it does not look as aesthetically appealing as I had hoped. This is also because I feel as if I could create a better piece that addresses the research question in a much more professional manner. For my next experiment, I plan to focus more on the concept of collaborative projects, drawing away from the collaborative aspect of the work and creating a more conceptual piece that demonstrates how collaboration in art and design creates communities, as well as its challenges and solutions.