law firm

The termination of an employment contract without a lawful reason can have financial consequences under Article 77 of the Saudi Labor Law.

However, compensation is not necessarily determined by one universal formula.

The type of contract, employee salary, length of service, remaining contractual period, contractual terms, and the circumstances surrounding termination may all be relevant when assessing the consequences of termination.

For fixed-term contracts, the remaining period can be particularly significant. For indefinite-term contracts, the employee’s wage and length of service may play an important role.

It is also essential to understand the difference between Article 77 and Article 80, as they concern different legal circumstances.

Read the complete guide to Saudi Labor Law Article 77 for a detailed explanation of compensation, termination rules, employee rights, and employer considerations.

رفضت شركة التأمين مطالبتك أو عرضت عليك تعويضًا أقل من قيمة الضرر؟ يساعدك محامي تأمين في السعودية على مراجعة وثيقة التأمين وتحليل التغطية والاستثناءات، ودراسة أسباب رفض المطالبة أو تخفيض التعويض، ثم اتخاذ الإجراء القانوني المناسب.

يقدم مكتب آل عثمان للمحاماة خدمات قانونية في مختلف النزاعات التأمينية، بما يشمل تأمين المركبات، والتأمين الصحي، وتأمين الممتلكات، والتأمين التجاري، من خلال التفاوض والتسوية وإعداد الاعتراضات وتمثيل العملاء أمام الجهات المختصة.

تواجه مشكلة جمركية أو غرامة أو حجز شحنة؟ يساعدك محامي قضايا جمركية في الرياض على التعامل مع المخالفات والنزاعات الجمركية، بدءًا من مراجعة المستندات والتصنيف والتقييم الجمركي، وصولًا إلى تقديم الاعتراضات والدفاع في قضايا التهريب الجمركي والتسويات الصلحية.

ويقدم مكتب آل عثمان للمحاماة الدعم القانوني للمستوردين والشركات في القضايا المرتبطة بالجمارك، مع دراسة موقف كل حالة واتخاذ الإجراء النظامي المناسب لحماية الحقوق وتقليل المخاطر.

هل تخطط لدخول السوق السعودي أو تأسيس نشاط استثماري داخل المملكة؟ يساعدك محامي استثمار أجنبي في الرياض على فهم المتطلبات النظامية واتخاذ الخطوات القانونية الصحيحة، بدايةً من تأسيس الشركة والحصول على التراخيص، وصولًا إلى صياغة العقود والامتثال والاندماج والاستحواذ.

يقدم مكتب آل عثمان للمحاماة خدمات قانونية متكاملة للمستثمرين الأجانب، مع دعم قانوني في تأسيس الكيانات التجارية، الشراكات والمشاريع المشتركة، العناية القانونية الواجبة، والتمثيل في النزاعات التجارية والاستثمارية.

تأخر المدين في سداد مستحقاتك قد يؤثر على سيولتك ويعرض مصالحك المالية للخطر. يساعدك محامي تحصيل ديون في الرياض في دراسة المستندات والعقود والسندات، والتفاوض مع المدين، واتخاذ الإجراءات القضائية والتنفيذية اللازمة لاسترداد حقوقك المالية وفق الأنظمة السعودية.

سواء كانت المطالبة ناتجة عن عقد تجاري، فاتورة، شيك، سند تنفيذي أو معاملة مالية، فإن التحرك القانوني الصحيح يساعد على حماية حقك وتقليل مخاطر التأخير والمماطلة.

تُعد قضايا التركات والمواريث من أكثر القضايا القانونية حساسية، خاصة عند تعدد الورثة أو وجود عقارات وأموال وشركات ضمن التركة. يساعدك محامي تركات ومواريث في الرياض في حصر التركة، إثبات الورثة، قسمة الأصول، وتنظيم الإجراءات القانونية لحماية حقوق جميع المستحقين.

إذا كنت تواجه نزاعًا حول تقسيم التركة أو تحتاج إلى مساعدة قانونية في إجراءات حصر الورثة، يمكن للمحامي المتخصص تقديم الدعم القانوني المناسب وإنهاء الإجراءات وفق الأنظمة المعمول بها في السعودية.

people tend to picture corporate lawyers as the people you call after something's already gone wrong — a lawsuit, a compliance issue, a partner conflict. but the most useful corporate legal work happens way earlier than that, at structural decisions nobody thinks to question until it's too late.

a corporate lawyer's job spans the whole life of a business — formation, growth, restructuring, eventual exit. unlike litigation, which is reactive by nature, corporate law is proactive. the whole point is preventing problems, not cleaning up after them.

company formation is where a lot of the biggest decisions get made without people realizing how big they actually are. LLC vs joint stock company vs holding structure vs branch office — this shapes your tax situation, governance requirements, flexibility, for years. wrong structure at the start = unnecessary tax burden or ownership headaches later that are expensive to fix.

governance is underestimated until it's a problem. clear board procedures, defined shareholder rights, documented duties — not red tape, this is what stops internal disputes from paralyzing a company. skip proper governance docs and you often end up with shareholder conflicts that upfront clarity would've prevented entirely.

shareholder/partnership agreements matter for the same reason — define ownership and exit mechanisms before anyone's actually upset. waiting until partners are already in conflict to figure out ownership resolution is, obviously, the worst possible timing.

M&A work is higher stakes — due diligence, negotiation, structuring that protects value both sides. legal work here isn't just closing the deal, it's making sure the deal actually delivers what both sides expected.

foreign investors involved = things get complex fast. ownership rules, licensing, regulatory approvals need addressing from the start, not bolted on after the deal's moving. businesses working with a corporate lawyer who also gets foreign investment rules navigate this way smoother.

compliance isn't one-time either. saudi corporate law keeps evolving, and businesses with ongoing access to a corporate legal advisor (rather than calling one only when there's a fire) are just better positioned to adapt.

been thinking about this a lot lately — most business disputes don't start because someone was acting in bad faith. they start because a contract wasn't specific enough. someone pulls out the agreement months later, reads a clause they barely remember, and realizes it doesn't actually say what they thought it said.

contract drafting gets treated like busywork constantly. something to rush through so the "real work" can start. but a contract is basically risk architecture — it defines what happens when things go well AND when they don't. breach terms, dispute resolution, remedies, how to end the relationship without it turning into a mess.

commercial contracts are probably the most common category — agency agreements, partnerships, franchise deals. sounds simple when you're negotiating verbally, but turning that into precise legal language is where it actually gets complicated. every clause needs to hold up legally, not just make sense commercially in the moment.

real estate contracts are their own thing entirely. leasing, property management, sales, mortgages, lease-to-own — all of this needs to line up with both shariah principles and local regulations. one vague clause in a financing contract and you're looking at a dispute that drags on for years, especially with big money involved.

then there's corporate/incorporation contracts — the stuff that records partner shares, capital, exit terms. this isn't a formality, this is literally the legal skeleton of how a company is owned. mess this up early and you're dealing with ownership disputes that are genuinely painful to untangle.

something people underestimate a lot — negotiation itself. people assume once terms are agreed verbally, drafting is just writing it down. not really true. good negotiation during drafting means catching ambiguous stuff before it becomes a problem, making sure both sides actually understand what they're agreeing to.

contracts also need room to change. circumstances shift, and something that made sense at signing might need adjusting later. having someone who can properly amend and document changes — instead of just verbally "agreeing to do it differently" — protects everyone when memories get fuzzy later.

if you're dealing with any of this, working with an actual contract lawyer instead of treating drafting like a template exercise makes a real difference. offer, acceptance, consideration, intent to create legal relations — sounds simple, but making each one hold up in precise legal language across commercial and real estate contexts takes real expertise.

هل تم إنهاء عقد عملك دون الالتزام بفترة الإشعار؟ أم أنك تفكر في إنهاء عقد موظف وتريد معرفة الالتزامات النظامية؟ هنا تأتي أهمية المادة 76 من نظام العمل، التي تنظم التعويض عن عدم الالتزام بمهلة الإشعار عند إنهاء العقد غير محدد المدة.

وبشكل مبسط، إذا أنهى أحد طرفي العقد العلاقة التعاقدية دون مراعاة مدة الإشعار النظامية، فقد يلتزم بدفع مبلغ يعادل أجر العامل عن مدة الإشعار التي لم يتم الالتزام بها، ما لم يتفق الطرفان على تعويض أكبر.

ويختلف مقدار التعويض بحسب الأجر ومدة الإشعار المستحقة، لذلك يجب مراجعة نوع العقد، وبنوده، وطريقة الإنهاء قبل تحديد المبلغ المستحق. كما ينبغي التمييز بين تعويض مهلة الإشعار وفق المادة 76 من نظام العمل والتعويض عن الإنهاء غير المشروع الذي قد يرتبط بأحكام المادة 77.

وتبرز أهمية هذه المادة في حماية الطرفين من آثار الإنهاء المفاجئ، سواء كان العامل بحاجة إلى وقت للبحث عن فرصة عمل جديدة أو كان صاحب العمل بحاجة إلى ترتيب بديل لاستمرار النشاط.

إذا كنت تواجه إنهاءً مفاجئًا لعقد العمل أو نزاعًا حول فترة الإشعار، فإن مراجعة الحالة مع محامٍ عمالي متخصص تساعدك على تحديد حقوقك والتزاماتك بدقة.

هل يحق لصاحب العمل تغيير مهام الموظف أو تكليفه بعمل مختلف عن وظيفته الأصلية؟ هنا تأتي أهمية المادة 60 من نظام العمل السعودي، التي وضعت ضوابط واضحة لتنظيم تكليف العامل بعمل يختلف عن العمل المتفق عليه.

وتنص المادة على أنه لا يجوز تكليف العامل بعمل يختلف اختلافًا جوهريًا عن عمله الأصلي دون موافقته الكتابية، مع وجود استثناءات محددة في حالات الضرورة والظروف العارضة، وبضوابط زمنية معينة.

وتشمل أبرز الحالات التي قد تسمح بالتكليف: أن تكون المهام الجديدة غير مختلفة جوهريًا عن العمل الأصلي، أو أن يحصل صاحب العمل على موافقة العامل الكتابية، أو أن توجد حالة ضرورة تبرر التكليف المؤقت.

وتكمن أهمية المادة 60 من نظام العمل السعودي في تحقيق التوازن بين احتياجات المنشأة وحقوق العامل، ومنع تغيير طبيعة العمل بشكل تعسفي قد يؤثر على المركز الوظيفي أو الالتزامات التعاقدية للموظف.

إذا تم تكليفك بمهام مختلفة عن وظيفتك، فمن المهم مراجعة عقد العمل وطبيعة المهام الجديدة والظروف التي تم فيها التكليف لتحديد مدى توافق الإجراء مع النظام.

هل لديك مستحقات مالية متأخرة وتبحث عن طريقة رسمية للمطالبة بها؟ خطاب مطالبة مالية جاهزة في السعودية قد يكون خطوة مهمة لتوثيق حقك وإعطاء المدين فرصة للسداد قبل تصعيد النزاع قانونيًا.

ويُستخدم خطاب المطالبة المالية في العديد من الحالات، مثل الديون التجارية، والفواتير غير المسددة، والمبالغ المستحقة بموجب العقود، والقروض أو الخدمات المقدمة. ولكي يكون الخطاب أكثر فاعلية، يجب أن يتضمن بيانات الدائن والمدين، وقيمة المبلغ المستحق، وسبب المديونية، وتاريخ الاستحقاق، والمهلة المحددة للسداد، مع توضيح الإجراءات القانونية التي قد يتم اتخاذها في حال عدم السداد.

كما ينبغي إرفاق المستندات التي تدعم المطالبة، مثل العقود والفواتير والإيصالات والمراسلات ذات الصلة، والاحتفاظ بما يثبت إرسال الخطاب واستلامه.

وتختلف الإجراءات السابقة لرفع الدعوى بحسب طبيعة المطالبة ونوع النزاع، لذلك فإن مراجعة المستندات مع محامٍ متخصص في تحصيل الديون تساعد على اختيار المسار القانوني المناسب وتجنب الأخطاء الإجرائية.

Before signing a contract or starting a business relationship in Saudi Arabia, verifying the company’s legal status is an essential step. A simple Check Commercial Registration inquiry can help you confirm whether a company is officially registered and legally active.

Through the Ministry of Commerce’s online services, you can search for a Commercial Registration (CR) using the CR number or company name. The results can provide important information such as the company’s legal name, registration number, current status, registered activities, and validity period.

Why is this important? Checking a company’s CR can help you avoid dealing with inactive or suspended businesses, confirm that the company is authorized to conduct its stated activities, and reduce potential legal and commercial risks before signing agreements or making financial commitments.

For investors, entrepreneurs, and companies entering the Saudi market, performing a Check Commercial Registration should be part of the initial due diligence process. However, a CR inquiry alone may not reveal every potential legal or financial risk associated with a business.

If you are planning to establish a company, enter into a partnership, sign a commercial agreement, or invest in an existing Saudi business, obtaining professional legal advice can provide an additional layer of protection.

هل تم إنهاء عقد عملك بشكل مفاجئ؟ وهل تعرف متى تستحق التعويض؟ تُعد المادة 77 من نظام العمل السعودي من أهم المواد التي تنظم التعويض عند إنهاء عقد العمل دون سبب مشروع، وتحدد الأساس الذي يمكن بناءً عليه تقدير التعويض للطرف المتضرر.

وتختلف طريقة حساب التعويض بحسب نوع عقد العمل. ففي العقد غير محدد المدة، يكون التعويض وفق أجر 15 يومًا عن كل سنة من سنوات الخدمة، مع مراعاة الحد الأدنى النظامي. أما في العقد محدد المدة، فيرتبط التعويض بالمدة المتبقية من العقد، ما لم يتضمن العقد تعويضًا محددًا مقابل الإنهاء غير المشروع.

ومن المهم أيضًا التمييز بين المادة 77 من نظام العمل السعودي والمادة 80، لأن لكل منهما نطاقًا مختلفًا وآثارًا قانونية مختلفة. فالمادة 77 ترتبط بالتعويض عن الإنهاء غير المشروع، بينما تتناول المادة 80 حالات محددة يمكن فيها لصاحب العمل فسخ العقد دون مكافأة أو إشعار وفق الشروط النظامية.

وقد تختلف الحقوق المستحقة من حالة إلى أخرى بحسب نوع العقد، وسبب الإنهاء، وبنود العقد، ومدة الخدمة، والمستندات المتوفرة.

إذا تم إنهاء عقدك أو كنت تواجه نزاعًا بشأن التعويض، فإن مراجعة الحالة مع محامٍ متخصص في القضايا العمالية تساعدك على معرفة حقوقك وتحديد قيمة التعويض المحتملة واتخاذ الإجراء القانوني المناسب.

هل تعلم أن رصيد إجازاتك السنوية غير المستخدم لا يضيع عند انتهاء علاقتك الوظيفية؟ توضح المادة 111 من نظام العمل السعودي حق العامل في الحصول على مقابل مالي عن أيام الإجازة السنوية التي لم يتمتع بها قبل انتهاء عقد العمل.

وتكمن أهمية المادة 111 من نظام العمل السعودي في أنها تحمي المستحقات المالية للعامل عند انتهاء العلاقة العمالية، سواء كان انتهاء العقد بسبب الاستقالة أو انتهاء مدته أو الفصل أو لأي سبب آخر وفق الحالة النظامية. ويشمل الاستحقاق رصيد الإجازات غير المستخدم، بما في ذلك ما يستحقه العامل عن أجزاء السنة بحسب مدة خدمته.

ويختلف هذا الحق عن الإجازة السنوية أثناء استمرار العمل، إذ تنظم المادة 109 حق العامل في التمتع بإجازته، بينما تركز المادة 111 على التعويض المالي عن الرصيد المستحق عند انتهاء العلاقة العمالية.

وقد تحدث خلافات بين العامل وصاحب العمل حول عدد أيام الإجازات المتبقية أو طريقة احتساب قيمتها، وهنا تصبح مراجعة عقد العمل وكشوف الرواتب وسجل الإجازات والمستندات المرتبطة بالعلاقة الوظيفية خطوة مهمة لتحديد المستحقات بدقة.

إذا كنت على وشك إنهاء عقدك أو لديك نزاع حول رصيد إجازاتك، فإن الحصول على استشارة قانونية متخصصة يساعدك على معرفة حقوقك واتخاذ الإجراءات المناسبة.

been reading up on mergers and acquisitions in saudi arabia and wanted to note the stuff that actually matters, because most of the advice out there focuses on negotiation tactics when the real mistakes happen way earlier than that — usually before a lawyer is even involved.

basic structure options first: share purchase (buying the whole company, liabilities included), asset purchase (picking specific assets, leaving unwanted liabilities behind, but needs more detailed drafting), or statutory merger (combining two companies into one, governed directly under the 2022 companies law, usually for bigger strategic deals).

here's where things actually go wrong, and it's earlier than people expect. getting a letter of intent or MOU on the table — review it before signing, not after, because these things tend to become functionally binding even when labeled otherwise. start of due diligence — what gets disclosed and flagged at this stage shapes your negotiating position for the rest of the deal. foreign party involved — cross-border deals need to align with MISA licensing and foreign ownership rules from day one, not fixed after terms are already agreed.

regulatory approval is probably the biggest source of delay. deals over certain thresholds need notification to the General Authority for Competition, and missing that deadline can delay or unwind a deal that's already signed. if the target is publicly listed, you're also dealing with CMA disclosure rules and sometimes mandatory offer obligations. this needs to be mapped early, not handled as an afterthought.

due diligence is a legal process, not just financial. going through contracts, corporate records, licenses, litigation history to catch risk before it's your problem. this is usually where valuation-affecting issues surface — unresolved registration stuff, licensing gaps, liabilities nobody mentioned. catching these before closing protects both your timeline and your price.

valuation and legal protection are more connected than people think. warranties, indemnities, price adjustment clauses — basically the legal version of fair market value. determines what happens if something's worse than disclosed after you've already closed. building these alongside your financial advisors, from the same facts, tends to produce agreements that actually hold up.

closing isn't the finish line either. what happens after — restructuring, contract novation, employee transfers — determines whether the deal actually delivers what you bought it for. if disputes come up after closing, warranty claims usually get enforced through saudi courts or arbitration, which is why the original drafting quality matters long after signing.

a few real examples: healthcare deal over SAR 10M ran into valuation and warranty disputes during due diligence, resolved by restructuring terms without stalling the deal. manufacturing acquisition over SAR 30M needed thorough review of assets/contracts/IP, ended with the IP secured fully under the buyer's name before signing. logistics deal with a 70% stake came down to whether long-term contracts could transfer without breaking — confirmed and protected through negotiated continuity warranties.

if you're looking into mergers & acquisitions lawyers for a deal, timing matters as much as who you pick. structuring decisions made early and deliberately tend to hold up. decisions made under pressure after terms are already locked tend to be the ones that cause problems later.

been reading up on international trade compliance for saudi arabia and wanted to jot down the stuff that actually matters, because most of what's written about this focuses on WTO rules in the abstract, and that's honestly only half the picture. the other half — the part that determines whether your shipment actually clears — is how ZATCA, SASO, and the Ministry of Investment enforce those rules locally.

this gap is where most problems come from. you can be fully compliant with WTO principles on paper and still get a shipment held over a tariff classification dispute, or have a product blocked because it doesn't meet an updated SASO requirement. it's not about doing something wrong, it's just that trade compliance here needs local knowledge, not just international knowledge.

a few situations where it's genuinely worth getting legal advice early instead of waiting: entering the saudi market for the first time and needing your trade structure right from the start (fixing it later costs way more), a shipment held over a valuation or classification dispute (speed matters here, every day adds cost), your foreign investment application facing extra scrutiny, or your supply chain touching sanctioned markets or restricted tech.

the actual scope of this area of law is bigger than people expect. customs and tariffs — classification, valuation, rules of origin, duty disputes — is usually where things get stuck first. sanctions and export controls cover screening, licensing, AML compliance, forced labor due diligence across your supply chain, and this keeps getting more complicated as dual-use goods categories expand.

antidumping and trade remedies are a whole separate thing — investigations into whether goods are being sold below fair value in a way that hurts domestic producers. if you're named in one, real financial exposure, and getting counsel in early (like, as soon as you get a questionnaire) matters a lot for the outcome. WTO disputes handle market access barriers through formal mechanisms. GCC trade agreements and free trade zones need actual structuring to capture preferential rates, you can't just assume you qualify. and foreign investment regulation connects to all of this since your licensing choices shape what you can legally move across borders.

different industries deal with this differently. petroleum products have their own export compliance stuff. steel manufacturers face concentrated tariff exposure both ways. critical minerals need serious due diligence given how high stakes get. shipping and logistics deal with customs constantly. tech and electronics deal with import compliance for regulated/dual-use goods, which shifts fast.

when something does go wrong the process is usually: initial conversation about your trade flows and the actual issue, review of contracts/customs records/licensing docs, strategy built around what you need, representation in front of saudi authorities, and ongoing support after so it doesn't happen again.

if you're looking for an international trade attorney, the thing to check is whether they have real direct relationships with ZATCA, SASO, and the Ministry of Investment — not just theoretical knowledge. firms actually built inside the system (where sanctions, customs, and investment questions get handled by the same team) tend to move faster than firms advising from outside the kingdom.

so i've been looking into what it actually takes to invest or start a business in saudi arabia as a foreign investor, and honestly there's a lot more nuance to it than the headlines suggest. yes, FDI is up, yes hundreds of companies are opening regional HQs in riyadh, yes the reforms are real. but the legal side is where things get complicated fast if you don't know what you're doing.

basic concept first — foreign direct investment means you're actually setting up or buying into a business, not just holding shares from far away. could be a full acquisition, a brand new setup, a joint venture with a local partner, or a branch office. the whole point is you have actual control over the operation, not just a financial stake.

the legal foundation for all this is the Investment Law (2024) and the Saudi Companies Law (2022), and together they basically put foreign investors on equal footing with local ones. that's a genuinely big deal compared to how things used to work. and the numbers back it up — FDI went up 24% in 2024, hit about SAR 119 billion, and 600+ international companies have set up regional headquarters in riyadh specifically.

here's the thing though. most people don't think to get legal advice until something's already broken. but the moments where a lawyer actually saves you real money come way earlier. like when you're trying to decide between an LLC, a branch office, or a joint stock company and don't know which one fits. or when you're about to submit your MISA application and you're not 100% sure your business activity is classified right against the Negative List — this specifically is where a lot of delays happen. or when a local partner sends you a shareholder agreement and wants it signed in like three days.

on structures — LLC is the most common by far. up to 100% foreign ownership, limited liability, works for basically most commercial activity. branch office is different, it's literally just an extension of your parent company with no separate legal identity, usually used for specific project work rather than a long-term local presence. if you're thinking bigger, like eventually going public on the Saudi Exchange, that's what a Joint Stock Company is for, but it comes with way more governance requirements. there's also joint ventures, rep offices for market research only, and holding companies if you're managing multiple businesses.

process-wise it goes in phases: first they check your activity against the Negative List and recommend a structure. then comes the actual MISA license and Commercial Registration. after that you still need secondary registrations — ZATCA, GOSI, chamber of commerce — before you're fully compliant. and even once you're up and running there's ongoing stuff like Saudization requirements under Nitaqat and annual filings.

different industries stack extra requirements on top too. tech companies deal with CITC licensing and data localisation rules. healthcare answers to the Saudi Food and Drug Authority. financial services setting up in the KAFD district deal with SAMA and CMA. anyone chasing giga-project contracts (NEOM, Diriyah Gate, that kind of thing) needs contracts structured around Local Content requirements specifically.

if you're looking for a foreign investment lawyer, worth checking three things before you commit — are they actually licensed with the Saudi Bar Association, do they have real hands-on MISA filing experience (not just general corporate background), and can they show completed deals in your actual sector. lawyers without recent MISA experience tend to mess up specifically at the Negative List stage, which is honestly the most common bottleneck people run into.

and if a dispute does happen — company vs company goes to Riyadh Commercial Court, anything involving a government body or regulator goes to the Board of Grievances, and if your contract has an arbitration clause you can skip courts entirely and go through the Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration.