Book Jon Snow vs. Show Jon Snow: Second Book vs. Second Season
Well, everyone, continuing the comparison between Jon Snow in the books and Jon Snow in the show, we have now reached A Clash of Kings and the second season of Game of Thrones. As with the first book, the broad events seem quite similar when summarized: Jon takes part in the Great Ranging, meets Craster, discovers what happens to his sons, reaches the Fist of the First Men, accompanies Qhorin Halfhand, meets Ygritte, spares her life, and ends up infiltrating the wildlings after killing Qhorin. The arc is still recognizable, but this time the changes to his personality are even more significant because the show does not limit itself to removing thoughts that would have been difficult to adapt. It changes the causes and consequences of several of Jonâs decisions, and that directly changes how the audience interprets his character.
The show preserves the characterâs moral core. Jon is still brave, compassionate, loyal to the Nightâs Watch, troubled by injustice, and willing to risk his own life. The problem is not that they turned Jon into someone without honor or intelligence. What happens is that the adaptation begins to associate some of his best qualities, especially compassion and moral independence, with recklessness, naivety, and failure. At the same time, it removes many of the scenes that showed his capacity for reflection, observation, and leadership. The result is a television Jon who seems more impulsive and less prepared than the Jon in the book, even when both are arriving at the same destination.
Jonâs ambition and the weight of Robb as king
One of the most important omissions occurs in Jonâs very first chapter. In the book, he learns that Robb has been proclaimed King in the North and has to deal with a mixture of pride, love, envy, and resentment. Jon sincerely says that Robb will be a good king, but he cannot avoid comparing the two of them. Robb will have a crown, a wife, children, lands, and recognition, while Jon will live in black, serving an order that will probably never sing of his accomplishments. Mormont sees this and uses the story of Maester Aemon, who refused the Iron Throne in order to honor his vows, as a way of confronting him.
When Mormont asks Jon to say that none of it troubles him, he does not try to pretend that he is completely selfless. His answer is:
âBe troubled. And keep my vows.â
This is a very short line, but it explains a great deal about the difference between book Jon and show Jon. The literary Jon is not honorable because he has stopped feeling envy, ambition, or a desire for recognition. He still feels all of those things. The honor lies in his decision not to let those feelings control his actions. Jon does not need to believe that his vows are easy or that Robbâs life does not seem more desirable. He can be troubled, admit that he is troubled, and still remain.
The show removes this conversation entirely, and with it an important part of Jonâs ambition disappears. On television, his ambition appears mainly when he tries to leave his position as a steward and take part in the rangersâ missions. He wants to prove that he knows how to fight, that he has already faced a wight, and that he can be useful beyond caring for Mormontâs horse and meals. That exists in the book as well, but the book shows that the issue runs deeper. Jon does not merely want a more interesting role within the Watch. He is still trying to determine whether a life of anonymous service will be enough for someone who grew up wanting to be recognized as Eddard Starkâs son.
Without the conversation about Robb and Aemon, the viewer may interpret Jonâs eagerness to accompany Qhorin as simple courage, impatience, or a desire for adventure. The reader knows that there is also a conflict involving status. Jon respects stewards, but still considers rangers more important. He respects his vows, but knows that Robb will receive everything he can never have. The show keeps his ambition visible, but removes the self-criticism that accompanies it. The literary Jon understands that he has contradictory feelings. The television Jon merely seems to be trying to prove his worth to his superiors.
Jonâs relationship with Sam reveals a warmer character in the book
Another important difference lies in his relationship with Sam. The show preserves their friendship, but greatly reduces the moments in which Jon displays humor, patience, and an ability to reassure another person. In the book, when he finds Sam hidden among the books, he jokes:
âSam, you are a sweet fool.â
Later, when Sam says that a brother of the Nightâs Watch should not be so afraid, Jon answers:
âWeâre all afraid. Weâd be fools if we werenât.â
Jon does not try to convince Sam that the danger is minor. He acknowledges that they are all afraid and turns that fear into something normal, rather than a source of shame particular to Sam. He then recalls what Ned taught him:
âMy father taught me that there is no shame in fear; what matters is how we face it.â
It is a simple demonstration of emotional leadership. Jon knows that Sam does not need a lie about them being completely safe. He needs to know that being afraid does not make him inferior to other men.
The show still presents Jon as Samâs protector, but much of their everyday companionship disappears. Because almost all of his scenes are connected to a mission, an argument, or a dangerous situation, the television Jon seems far more closed off. The character is naturally reserved, but the book allows him to joke, smile, observe his friends, and adapt the way he speaks according to the person before him. In the show, there is less of that variation. He speaks to Mormont, Sam, Craster, Qhorin, and Ygritte with almost the same seriousness.
This has a considerable effect on the audienceâs perception. Readers may consider Jon introspective, but they are unlikely to see him as merely brooding. He can be affectionate, ironic, and even childish. Viewers of the show receive a more consistently melancholy version, which helps create the image of the serious hero but also makes part of his personality seem simpler.
Craster: prudence in the book, impulsiveness in the show
The difference becomes much clearer at Crasterâs Keep. In the book, Jon discovers the fate of the sons through his conversation with Gilly. He notices that there are no boys or other men there, listens to what she says about the âcold gods,â and connects her description of blue eyes with the wights who attacked Castle Black. Jon does not break into anywhere, secretly follow Craster, or get caught spying. After the Nightâs Watch leaves the keep, he approaches Mormont and asks him directly about the sacrifices.
Before that, when Sam tries to devise a way to save Gilly, Jon reacts with irritation because he knows they have neither the authority nor the means to take her with them. Even so, after walking away, he thinks:
âThen why do I feel so ashamed?â
The question is important because Jon is not satisfied with his own answer, even though he knows it is rational. He understands that taking Gilly could endanger the mission, provoke Craster, and compromise a source of shelter and information the Watch needs. At the same time, he also understands that using those justifications does not make abandoning her morally comfortable. Jon does not solve the problem. He recognizes that the problem exists and that being unable to help does not erase his emotional responsibility.
In the show, the discovery is turned into a suspense sequence. Jon follows Craster at night, sees the baby being taken, is discovered, and is struck down. Craster threatens to expel the entire Watch, and Mormont has to manage the consequences of his stewardâs disobedience. The scene is effective at showing the viewer directly what happens to the sons, but it greatly changes Jonâs characterization. In the book, he reaches the truth through observation, empathy, and deduction. In the show, he reaches it because he ignores orders, spies on an ally, and nearly compromises the mission.
Afterwards, both versions receive a similar lesson from Mormont. The Nightâs Watch knows that Craster is monstrous, but it needs him. His keep has already saved rangers, and there are greater threats to the north. In the book, Jon thinks:
âOther wars. Yes. I must remember that.â
He does not come to consider Craster acceptable, but he understands Mormontâs argument. The lesson is not that injustice has ceased to matter. It is that a commander does not have the freedom to act solely according to his own indignation when hundreds of lives depend on the consequences.
In the show, the same idea appears as a more direct correction of Jonâs insubordination. Mormont has to remind him that he is a steward, that he wants to lead one day, and that before he can do that he must learn to obey. This reinforces a pattern the season creates for the character: Jon sees something morally wrong, acts immediately, and only afterwards discovers that the situation was more complicated. Book Jon is also idealistic, but he is considerably more prudent. He waits until they have left the keep, speaks to Mormont in private, and listens to the answer before deciding what to think.
The change benefits Mormont, because it makes him seem more experienced and responsible, but weakens Jon. In the book, the conversation is between a morally troubled young man and a pragmatic commander. In the show, it is also a reprimand delivered to a boy who created an unnecessary problem. The viewer learns that Jon needs to control his impulsiveness. The reader learns that Jon needs to accept the limits of power and the moral cost of an institution.
Jonâs practical intelligence is far more visible in the book
There are also several small scenes in which the book demonstrates a practical intelligence that the show barely uses. When they reach the Fist of the First Men, the officers are pleased with the elevated position and the ancient defenses. Jon, however, immediately notices a weakness:
âA long climb for a drink [...] and outside the ringwall.â
It is a simple observation, but a very significant one. The more experienced men are thinking about walls, slopes, and possible attacks. Jon thinks about supplies and the fact that any man fetching water will have to leave the defensive position. He is not trying to seem clever or challenge the officers. He simply notices a problem the others have overlooked.
Later, Mormont asks his opinion about keeping the rangers close to the Fist. Jon answers that if they always remain nearby, they will never find Benjen. Mormont has already reached the same conclusion and explains that he intends to let Benjen find the large camp, if he is still alive. The most important point is that the Lord Commander asks Jonâs opinion and expects an honest answer. He does not treat the boy as merely a servant.
These scenes begin to build the future commander before Jon holds any formal position. He thinks about logistics, notices weaknesses, observes the menâs behavior, understands Samâs fear, and can speak to Mormont without simply repeating what he imagines the commander wants to hear. In the show, Jon displays courage and initiative, but he is rarely given opportunities to demonstrate this kind of reasoning. When he wants to accompany Qhorin, he has to argue that he has already killed a wight. The value being presented is primarily martial.
Qhorin recognizes Jonâs potential earlier in the book
In the book, Qhorin chooses Jon. Mormont even points out that he is young, a steward, and not officially a ranger, but Qhorin insists. In the show, Jon volunteers and has to persuade his superiors to let him take part. The difference seems small, but it changes the dynamic. In the book, one of the most experienced men in the Nightâs Watch observes Jon and decides that he has some useful quality. In the show, Jon is once again trying to prove that he deserves an opportunity.
This does not mean that book Jon is already ready to lead. He remains inexperienced and, in several situations, does not fully understand what the older men are doing. The difference is that Mormont and Qhorin already recognize in him a potential that goes beyond skill with a sword. The show delays that recognition. The viewer sees a young man who wants to become a ranger. The reader sees experienced men beginning to prepare a possible leader.
Ygritte and the removal of Jonâs cultural education
Jonâs relationship with Ygritte is probably the most important change of the entire season. In the book, Jon accompanies Stonesnake on a climb to the wildling lookout post. He takes part in the attack, kills a man in combat, and captures Ygritte. Therefore, his later difficulty in executing her does not come from a general inability to kill. Jon has already killed when his own life and the mission were at risk. The problem is deliberately killing a prisoner who has surrendered.
During the night, Jon talks to Ygritte and listens to the story of Bael the Bard. She presents a version of Stark history that he has never heard, talks about the free folk, and questions the way the people south of the Wall organize the world. When Ygritte explains that Winterfell lies in the South to the wildlings, Jon answers:
âI suppose it all depends on where youâre standing.â
This line shows an important characteristic of Jon that the show reduces: he is capable of listening to a perspective that contradicts everything he has learned. He does not automatically accept the story of Bael as truth, but neither does he end the conversation by simply calling Ygritte an ignorant wildling. He asks questions, corrects what he believes is wrong, and at the same time admits that certain classifications depend on the position from which one looks.
Their closeness in the book begins through culture, stories, and identity. There is attraction, but it is not yet the center of the relationship. Ygritte presents Jon with a different view of the wildlings, and he begins to understand that the people known as the free folk are not merely an army of raiders. They are people with songs, their own versions of history, families, beliefs, and contradictions.
In the show, much of the story of Bael is removed. Jon and Ygritteâs time together is built primarily around sexual teasing. She realizes that he is a virgin, makes fun of his discomfort, presses her body against his, and questions the sense of a young man renouncing women. The scenes create chemistry and work very well at making the relationship entertaining, but they change what Ygritte represents at that point.
In the book, she begins by challenging Jonâs political and cultural worldview. In the show, she begins by challenging his sexual repression and seriousness. The literary Jon displays curiosity and an ability to reconsider his prejudices. The television Jon displays innocence, repressed desire, and difficulty dealing with a woman who controls the conversation.
Jonâs mercy is a moral decision in the book and a mistake in the show
The decision to spare Ygritte also takes on a completely different meaning. In the book, Qhorin says that they have no food for a prisoner and no men available to guard her. Jon understands that he has to execute her, raises Longclaw, and cannot complete the stroke. He tells Ygritte to run. When he tells Qhorin the truth, he expects to be condemned, but the ranger explains that he did not give a direct order. He wanted to see what Jon would decide.
âTo lead men, you must know them, Jon Snow. And I know more of you now than I did this morning.â
Qhorin does not say that Jon necessarily made the ideal decision, but he makes it clear that the missionâs survival did not depend on Ygritteâs death. He says that if he had truly needed her dead, he would have done it himself or left her with another ranger. The choice functions as a test of character. Qhorin wanted to know what Jon would do when given a responsibility without an absolutely clear instruction.
In the show, sparing Ygritte begins a chain of failures. Jon hesitates, she runs, he pursues her, the two of them become separated from the group, and they are eventually captured. Qhorinâs companions die, and Jon believes it happened because they went back to look for him. The narrative turns mercy into an operational failure. He does not merely spare a prisoner; he loses control of her, abandons his position, and places his brothers in danger.
This difference profoundly changes the way the audience understands Jon. For the reader, the decision shows that he can kill in combat but has a moral limit when faced with someone who has surrendered. Qhorin uses that information to understand him better. For the viewer, the decision demonstrates kindness, but also naivety and a lack of discipline. His compassion remains admirable, but it is presented as something that must be controlled because it can get other people killed.
I do not think the show is saying that Jon should simply kill any prisoner. The problem is the way it constructs the consequences. The literary Jonâs mercy neither prevents him from returning to the group nor causes the deaths of his brothers. The television Jonâs mercy is directly tied to his capture and the destruction of the mission. As a result, the reader tends to see moral independence. The viewer tends to see a good young man who still does not understand that good intentions can produce disasters.
The change also weakens the characterâs intelligence. In the book, Jon takes Ygritteâs axe away, keeps the prisoner under guard, questions her, and then makes a conscious decision. In the show, he allows her to manipulate him, escape his custody, and lure him away from his companions. The show could have preserved Jonâs compassion without turning him into an incompetent guard, but instead uses her escape to create the necessary separation between him and Qhorin.
Ghost and Jonâs supernatural dimension were almost entirely removed
Another very important omission is the supernatural bond with Ghost. In the book, Ghost is not merely a faithful animal. He senses danger, leads Jon to the cache of dragonglass, and functions as an extension of his identity. It is the direwolf who finds the bundle buried near the Fist, containing knives, spearheads, obsidian arrowheads, and an ancient horn, all wrapped in a black cloak of the Nightâs Watch. In the show, this discovery is transferred to Sam, Grenn, and Edd after Jon has already left with Qhorin.
The change strengthens Samâs connection with knowledge and dragonglass, but takes from Jon a discovery that was directly connected to Ghostâs behavior. In the book, there is a sense that the direwolf knows more than Jon himself and is trying to lead him toward something important. In the show, Ghost remains a valuable companion, but his function is much closer to that of an exceptional animal than to a supernatural part of Jon.
This becomes even clearer when the wolf dream is removed. In the book, Jon falls asleep and begins to see through Ghost. During the dream, he senses the other direwolves and the familyâs separation:
âThere were five where there should have been six, and they were scattered, each apart from the others.â
Then he sees Bran in the form of a weirwood, observes Manceâs enormous camp, the giants and the mammoths, and is attacked by the skinchangerâs eagle.
When he wakes, Jon insists that it was only a dream, but Qhorin corrects him:
He takes the vision seriously and asks Jon to recount everything. The rangers do not treat the experience as a childish fantasy, because they already know that ancient powers are returning.
This passage ties Jon much more closely to the magical element of the story. He is not merely an honorable bastard who becomes a leader. He is also someone connected to the old gods, the direwolves, Bran, and the return of powers the Nightâs Watch does not yet understand. The reader sees that Jon occupies an intermediate position between several identities: Stark and bastard, man and wolf, crow and wildling, the political world and the supernatural world.
The second season removes almost all of this. Without the dream and without Ghostâs discovery, the television Jon seems much more conventional. His importance lies in honor, courage, and his political future, not in a supernatural ability that is beginning to awaken. To those who only watch the show, Ghost may seem primarily like a Stark symbol and a companion in battle. To those who read the books, the bond between them is already beginning to change Jonâs own perception of the world.
Jon accepts the infiltration mission among the wildlings more consciously in the book
Qhorin also has a deeper role in the book. He is not merely a great ranger who leads Jon on a mission and then sacrifices himself. He observes Jon from the moment he chooses him. He tests his physical ability, his obedience, his judgment, and his reaction to Ygritte. After the wolf dream, he immediately accepts that the information may be true and changes the course of the mission.
When he realizes that they will not be able to escape, Qhorin clearly explains what Jon must do. He orders him to surrender, join the wildlings, tear his cloak to pieces if necessary, curse the Nightâs Watch, and pretend to be an oathbreaker. What matters is that he remain loyal within and discover what Mance is searching for in the mountains. Jon accepts reluctantly, but his greatest concern is that Mormont know the truth. He asks:
âI will do as you say [...] But [...] you will tell him that I never broke my vows.â
This line reveals that Jon still depends heavily on the judgment of father figures. He accepts that the wildlings, and perhaps the entire Nightâs Watch, may believe he is a traitor, but he needs to imagine that Mormont will know he remained loyal. Jon can sacrifice his public reputation, but he is not yet ready to live entirely without the validation of someone he respects.
The show preserves the general plan, but compresses it and makes it less clear. Qhorin realizes that Jon can infiltrate the wildlings, begins insulting him in front of them, and provokes the fight that will end in his own death. The strategic purpose is present, but the season places much greater emphasis on Jonâs guilt and trauma. He has killed a mentor, must pretend that he betrayed his brothers, and believes the entire situation began because he could not execute Ygritte.
In the book, Jon is also deeply shaken, but he understands what Qhorin is doing. When the fight ends, he thinks:
âHe knew. He knew what they would ask of me.â
The death is not an accident provoked by anger or a genuine defeat for Qhorin. It is the final step of a mission that had been explained beforehand.
This gives Jon greater responsibility. He is not merely manipulated into reacting. He must consciously accept the order to appear a traitor, fight Qhorin, and continue living after killing him. The show makes the scene more emotionally immediate because Jon appears surrounded, guilty, and desperate. The book makes the situation more complex in relation to duty. Jon knows that his public honor will be destroyed and accepts it because true honor, at that moment, consists of carrying out a mission that no one may ever recognize.
The book shows Jon learning; the show shows Jon making mistakes
In the book, therefore, Jonâs arc is built primarily as an education in leadership. He acknowledges that he envies Robb, but keeps his vows. He helps Sam understand fear. He discovers Crasterâs crimes without compromising the mission. He notices the water problem at the Fist. He listens to Ygritteâs story and admits that point of view changes oneâs understanding of the world. He is tested by Qhorin, begins to discover his connection with Ghost, and accepts appearing dishonorable in order to serve the Nightâs Watch.
In the show, the arc is built more clearly as a lesson about impulsiveness. Jon follows Craster, is discovered, and has to be reprimanded. He insists on joining Qhorinâs mission. He spares Ygritte, loses the prisoner, becomes separated from his companions, and is captured. He then has to turn his own failure into an opportunity for infiltration. This structure is more direct and perhaps easier to follow on television, because each mistake has a visible consequence. However, it also makes Jon seem less competent.
Book Jon needs to learn that leadership requires accepting morally imperfect situations, knowing oneâs men, controlling his own ambition, and distinguishing true honor from reputation. The Jon of the second season needs, above all, to learn to obey and not allow his impulses to damage a mission. Both are still maturing, but they are not starting from exactly the same place.
The show turns some of Jonâs best qualities into problems
There is also a change in the way his goodness is presented. In the book, Jon can be compassionate and still be prudent. He can help Sam without lying about the danger, worry about Gilly without dragging the entire Nightâs Watch into a conflict, and spare Ygritte without being captured because of it. In the show, the same qualities frequently cause problems. His indignation over Craster creates a crisis. His mercy toward Ygritte leads to his separation from the group. His desire to take part in the action ends with companions dead.
This begins to create a perception that will follow the character through much of the adaptation: Jon is a good man, perhaps too good for the world he lives in, but he is not always intelligent in the way he applies his principles. In the books, the perception is different. Jon can make wrong decisions, but his morality is not separated from his intelligence. He observes, argues, adapts, and learns quickly.
The show has not removed all of Jonâs intelligence or completely turned him into the character who, in the later seasons, seems to repeat statements about honor without analyzing the situation. But the simplification begins here. The second season eliminates the conversation about Robb and Aemon, reduces his relationship with Sam, turns the discovery about Craster into an act of disobedience, removes the strategic observations, changes the encounter with Ygritte, removes the story of Bael, transfers the dragonglass to Sam, and eliminates the wolf dream.
What remains is the brave, honorable, compassionate, and determined young man. What begins to disappear is the ambitious boy who knows he is jealous, the friend capable of understanding Samâs fear, the observer who notices logistical flaws, the listener who reconsiders his own point of view, the potential skinchanger, and the future leader whom men such as Mormont and Qhorin have already begun to recognize.
So, what is the real difference?
To those who watch the show, Jon probably seems like a good-hearted young man who still needs to control his impulsiveness and gain experience. His main quality is honor, and his main weakness is his failure to understand that the world demands hard decisions. To those who read the book, he seems more aware of his own contradictions. He remains young and inexperienced, but already displays political intelligence, leadership ability, and a genuine willingness to learn from different people.
I would say that the greatest difference is that the show presents Jonâs maturation as the correction of his mistakes, while the book presents that maturation as an expansion of his understanding. The television Jon needs to learn not to act before thinking. The literary Jon needs to learn that thinking more carefully does not make decisions easier and that, sometimes, understanding every side only makes duty heavier.
Well, this has already become far too long. As in the previous post, the translations I made are from the Portuguese quotations in the edition of the book I used for my reading, so they may differ in other editions.
Once again, feel free to share different opinions about some of these moments đ