Monterey Bay Aquarium

oozey mess
d e v o n
will byers stan first human second
wallacepolsom
Sade Olutola

Discoholic 🪩
NASA
Three Goblin Art

titsay
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
KIROKAZE
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Jules of Nature

seen from Ecuador
seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
@kitkatopinions

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I genuinely think that "you just wanted a different show" and "you have to have your hand held" have become the anti-criticism phrases that I hate more than anything.
Every now and again, these sentiments are true, and there are people that literally just don't pay attention and then blame a show for not out and out saying things bluntly and repeatedly, or for just not being the type of show they want. That's true, I'm not saying that never happens.
But most of what I've seen is people saying incredibly valid things about how characters are underdeveloped to the point of feeling badly done, useless, or two dimensional. Or that a show had really interesting concepts that never came to fruition, or felt like it was going one way and then randomly seemed to turn on a dime. Or that a show didn't have characters interact enough to feel like they're close or that they're close enough for the emotional moments that the show is trying to get the audience to engage in. Or that something that was done was either badly set up, or written in a way that made it feel shallow or flat or emotionless. But all of that gets dismissed every time, waved away with a "you just wanted your hand held."
Like, I feel like I'm actively not supposed to care about or engage with media anymore, because every time I do, people get angry that I "need my hand held" or "wanted a different show" if I ever express dissatisfaction with the media I watch. If there's a friendship between two characters and the show never actually really seemed to have them connect and yet randomly decides that they've become best friends off screen, people just say "well, the writer wasn't going to hold your hand" and act like you're the idiot for wanting to see the friendship develop. If there's an interesting setting or world with interesting rules or monsters or things that would naturally happen, and then the show just kind of acts like those features don't even exist, people just say "sorry you wanted to watch a different show, but that isn't the creators' fault" and acting like you're the idiot for expecting anything to matter.
The worst thing is that it feels like a lot of media creators write their stories just assuming that fandom will carry them, that they don't need to write good characters or good relationships or good stories, because hey, there are hundreds of people on AO3 already doing that for them that just need enough juice to keep going! And then those hundreds of people on AO3 doing all the heavy lifting of making a show make sense, be interesting, and have good characters all then turn around and get mad that not everyone is pretending that the show they like is something that it isn't. The amount of shows that I think turned out mid-tier at best and actively terrible at worst that wind up getting compared to Avatar The Last Airbender because the fans did a bunch of work to fill in the gaps is crazy. A redemption arc will get hyped up as just as good as Zuko because a bunch of fans looked at a character with bad motivations or a rushed past two-episode emotional journey and say "well I don't need to have my hand held" and then act like everyone needs to see it as deep and well done and meaningful because you can just assume it is off screen.
People always will tell you why on paper, everything in a bad story technically could be good. But the thing is that you need more than good elements that can be well done in order to write things well, you actually have to write them well. "This character is obviously deep, here are all of the elements that this character has that people could connect to that would make a well done character more deep" well, sure, but they aren't well written, so the character feels shallow. "Some stories don't have to have deep lore, you don't always need that for a good show" okay yeah, but the fact that some shows don't need lore isn't a good pushback on a criticism of a show with badly done lore that the show would have benefited from. "Stop complaining that the dynamic between these characters was badly done, anyone in this situation would naturally develop a relationship like this," yeah good point, too bad we didn't see that, so it still feels sloppy! "You wanted an ensemble show, this show didn't have to be that" okay but that doesn't change a criticism about being expected as audience members to care about characters that are shallow or irrelevant.
I just think these type of complaints nine times out of ten feel incredibly ungenerous and ridiculous. Most of the time, it feels like an anti-criticism tactic designed to make other people feel like idiots for actually trying to engage with the media that we watch. People seriously act like the only way that you're supposed to watch media is to go "cool fun ideas and bright colors" and then engaging in fanworks. And to be clear I don't even think that that's too bad of a way to watch things, I have seen plenty of mediocre or bad media that had really interesting concepts that I've then devoted way too much time to re-writing for my own personal tastes (RWBY comes to mind lol.) But I just don't think we should then pretend that's what the media actually is, and I don't think that we should then get mad at other people for actually caring about and trying to engage with the media that they watch.
Hi. Why do you think Aang has abandonment issues?
Hey, thanks for this ask! So, it's been a hot second since I last saw the first season of ATLA (the last time the show was watched through around me, my sister-in-law started with the second season and I missed several episodes of that too by going to work lol,) so bear with me as I try to remember details to explain why I think that Aang has abandonment issues.
The catalyst for Aang running away and getting caught in that storm was him thinking he would be taken away from Monk Gyatso.
He gets super attached to Katara and Sokka very quickly and gets so upset at the idea of them leaving him that he hides information from them to try to force them to stay.
His attachment to his friends but especially Katara is something that he really struggles to give up even when he's told he'll never be able to control the Avatar State until he does give up his attachments.
Speaking of the Avatar state, almost every time Aang goes into the Avatar state it's because he lost/might lose someone he cares about.
I suppose there are other explanations for these things that some people may have come up with. But for me especially after Aang loses his people and Monk Gyatso after he wakes up in the iceberg, it seems like his fear of losing people whether by them dying or them leaving is one hundred percent a full abandonment issues problems. I think he kind of grows to let go more as the seasons wear on, but especially in the early show I think he does really struggle to let people go. I'm not saying this is a bad thing that makes Aang a bad person (I love Aang so so so much, I am not at all a Aang hater lol,) he's a deeply traumatized child and it only makes sense for him to have an issue with that kind of thing. But yeah, I do think it is there.
Also I just thought it was a funny thing to have Aang say. XD
I've been watching Legend of Korra for the first time in my life. I've only gotten through the first season and a couple of episodes of season two, but boy howdy.
There are a lot of things I like about it so far, but I have about six hundred criticisms. And I can't get through an episode without hating on Mako. XD Why is he even there?
I love Korra and Tenzin though, and the bending is so cool! Asami and Bolin are both growing on me, too, and I love Zuko's grandson more than my own life. It's not ATLA, but it's okay so far!
Here's hoping it gets better, and also here's hoping they learn how to write for little kids so Meelo stops annoying me to death.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Me, playing Tomadachi Life: "I keep trying to make Blake be friends with the rest of Team RWBY, but it says she and Weiss aren't getting along! Why aren't they getting along?"
My sister, watching over my shoulder: "I'll give you one guess."
Are you Neurodivergent, and did you HATE getting "poked" on facebook?
Neurodivergent: I hated it
Neurodivergent: I didn't mind
Neurotypical: I hated it
Neurotypical: I didn't mind
Not applicable to me; show results
My sister and I (both self-diagnosed Neurodivergent) were talking and this randomly came up, but remember how back in the aughts and 2010's, everybody would "Poke" you on Facebook? (I deleted my account 5+ years ago and she's been inactive for just as long and we were BOTH mostly inactive for years before that, so maybe the feature still exists but we wouldn't know.)
And we both agree that we fucking HATED it and as we compared notes we agreed that we always felt like it was some kind of really stupid social test like people would come up to us irl and be like "Hey I poked you on Facebook and you never poked me back" like okay??? What was the fucking point??? I don't want to get poked in real life so why was I supposed to pretend to think it was cute and teehee funny online??? Like we HAD to "poke" people back and what was the reason??? It came with no attached comment, it came with no attached emotion explained (if people "liked" a post, that had an attached emotion, but what emotion was Poking??? It was just bothering you with a notification letting you know that NOTHING OF CONSEQUENCE had happened and for why???) Like I always imagined that whoever had "poked" me was off somewhere sitting in front of their computer giggling to themselves at a joke with a punchline I sure as hell did not understand, and it would bother me so much. But that was irrational, of course; as pointless as "poking" was, being *angry* about poking was even MORE pointless, so I always just sucked it up and poked the person back but like. It made me so irrationally angry every time it happened. Like what was I supposed to do??? Tell my friends I hated the completely harmless and innocent thing they did as (apparently) a sign of our friendship? Yeah right.
But I fucking hated it.
This was such a weird social prison. I never understood what I was supposed to get out of it.
Like, someone would 'poke' me on Facebook, and I would just be like
Like why were they doing it to me? Why was I stuck in an endless loop of getting poked and poking back? I didn't understand the social interaction and I still don't, in my heart of hearts.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Jax haters are about to make me come back to Tumblr for a completely different fandom
I still can't believe there are people out here trying to pretend like Hunters in RWBY aren't just fantasy cops.
Yes, RWBY is pretty freaking bad copaganda but I'm not actually one hundred percent against the idea of them being fantasy law enforcement if it hadn't been done in the most copaganda way possible, because fiction doesn't always match reality. But like??? There are people saying they're not cops and there's nothing copanganda about RWBY???
Let's not pretend here guys. They are badge carrying law enforcement officers who work for the government and can arrest people. And then RWBY fans are gonna turn around and be like "Cait and Vi from Arcane are worse than Blake and Yang because they're cops." Blake and Yang are cops! They're fantasy police officers by another name. This is more proof that people will just let RWBY get away with anything that they would be against in like any other thing. This is why even if a RWBY re-write does the same things the actual show does, they still get hate from the same people who are against any and all criticism of RWBY.
People are really out here watching a different show, because they just change whatever is in RWBY that doesn't line up with their made up concept, and then accuse rwde posters of lying.
Eh, I would say that the Huntsmen are actually mercenaries or bounty hunters. They can choose who to work for.
And most of the time they fight Grimm. They even rebel against authorities (Like Ironwood), and that's something that normal cops don't do.
I would say that RWBY is not copaganda because the Huntsmen aren't government workers. They are agents who sometimes work for the government but that is their personal choice and they can also work for other parties.
Anyway, when Team RWBY worked for Ironwood, he was somewhat sane.
I'm really hoping this is a good faith argument, so in goof faith I'll say I get where you're coming from. The RWBY writers took years to fill out what hunters actually do and their job is so varied that one hunter that's a traveler looks and feels completely different from another hunter like Clover, but they are both hunters, as are Dee and Dudley from season six, Qrow, Winter, and Team RWBY in volume 7. By and large, the actual working hunters we've seen in the show ARE specifically working for the government doing things involving working with humans AND ALSO slaying Grimm, not one or the other. Although the show frames Hunters that act as something of a bounty hunter/mercenary as normal in V4 and I don't think the HH worked for the Government (unless you count working for Robyn who wanted to be in the government,) that isn't what we've seen in action the most. By and large, the actually official working hunters we've seen were specifically working for the government and were expected to be law enforcement officers on top of Grimm hunters, not one or the other. We also see that at the very least, Atlas and Beacon are both tied to the government, with Oz's position threatened by the Vale council in V3. The hunter academies are run by the government and it seems that there are multiple avenues that hunters can take, one of which is being a traveling Grimm hunter, and one of which is being a law enforcement officer. But either way, it seems like they mostly answer to the government because in V5 we see Qrow using a government set up system to look for any and all Mistral hunters. They might be able to choose jobs, but it seems to me that they still answer to the government in one way or another. Again, in the first five seasons, this was vague, so I get the confusion.
But more importantly, Team RWBYJNOR were law enforcement officers. They carried badges, they arrested people, they used their weapons to get into a civilian's home (whether or not they were related to that civilian is irrelevant,) they flashed their badges to get people to do what they said, they used it as a sign of authority when addressing other people, they interfaced with the public as extensions of the government working to enforce government law. Whether or not ALL hunters are fantasy cops with a different name, that's certainly what Team RWBY became in V7. I said this in a different post, but I only think that RWBY delved into copaganda in the seventh season because of this, the writers chose to make Team RWBY become the fantasy equivalent of cops when they were given a chance to flesh out what so far had been a very vague position and instead of going with 'they're specialists who only fight Grimm' they instead chose to write Team RWBY to take patrols and arrest people. It had been previously established that hunters fight people (Glynda v. Cinder and Roman in ep 1, we see the kids fighting each other to train for that in V2, it's always treated as something normal for hunters to do, Qrow wanted to get hunter friends to help them in V5,) but it originally seemed like they mostly fought Grimm. But in V7, their role is both fighting Grimm AND being law enforcement officers to people, and I don't remember this ever being treated as weird.
We could say hypothetically that some hunters are not cops, but that doesn’t change the fact that when Team RWBY were written to become hunters, they DID operate as badge carrying law enforcement officers. If the show writers had stuck to the vague monster hunting mercenaries who might occasionally fight people route, I wouldn't consider the show copaganda. But they did make them law enforcement officers in V7.
The idea that somehow they weren't cops because they defy the law is a strange one, and let me try to explain why and I hope I don't say this in a confusing way.
Cops defy the law all the time. One of the many problems with cops is that they do things that they're not allowed to do (like break into people's houses without a warrant, or enact violence against people in their custody, or kill people who aren't threats,) and then their fellow cops cover for them or the precinct doesn't take it seriously or they get put on a paid leave while the bad press blows over. Cops not following the law and getting away with it because they're cops and therefore they think they’re above the law is something that people are trying to push back against, which is why people are pushing for stronger accountability, harsher sentences, required bodycams, so on and so forth. One problem with RWBY is that it suggests that "following the law" is something hunters are held back by and they should be allowed to do whatever they want with no consequences as badge carrying law enforcement officers working for the government (which is what they were in V7.) Coco is another example, in the Before the Dawn book specifically, she acts shocked and indignant when held to any rule, she wants to be a badge carrying law enforcement officer who can go after criminals, but she doesn't want to have any rules over what she can or can't do with that authority.
And cops can also defy their position as working for the government and stop working for the government, or go against corruption and get fired, which is something we've seen as people are unwilling to accept the systemic racism built into the system in real life and leave their jobs as cops. You're right that in RWBY, it seems like they can stop working for the government and still be hunters (I say 'it seems' because the RWBY writers are really bad about leaving things vague.) But A. I'm not sure that's what happened because in the 'original ending for V9' it looked like Ren and Nora just started working for the government in Vacuo so it doesn't seem like the show is taking a 'it's bad to be a cop' route, but B. The show didn't have Team RWBY reflect on their role as badge carrying law enforcement officers as something bad that they regret, they didn't have them look back on working with the government in Atlas as a mistake, they didn't have them grapple with what it means to be a hunter, or have them decide they don't want to work for the government anymore. In fact, it feels like the show went out of its way to say that the only person at fault had been Ironwood, that Winter and the Ace Ops were by and large fine and with Winter specifically we don't even have to think about her role as a government law enforcement officer meaning she's a worse person, because so long as Ironwood is gone now, everything is fine and good. Headmaster Theodore is fine, Winter is fine, Team RWBY doesn't have to do an ounce of reflection, everyone can just work for a different government (probably,) Team RWBY aren't going to lose their badges, no one has to worry about unpacking the system because we can all just say it was Ironwood's fault. One thing that's prevalent in copaganda is the idea that the system is fine, there are just bad apples. It seems like RWBY does that. The show frames Team RWBY as not being in the wrong for being badge carrying law enforcement officers because, as you said, that was before Ironwood turned evil.
That's what it feels like the show is saying when they have WBY proudly proclaiming that hunters help people and therefore it is their identity in V9 maybe four in-universe days after splitting off from Ironwood in the first place without having any of them do an ounce of reflecting on whether or not they were in the wrong or what being a hunter means, and they refuse to acknowledge the much bigger than Ironwood problems with being a hunter in the first place with all the corruption we (and Team RWBY personally) have seen.
I don't think "RWBY is copaganda" because EVERY hunter we've seen is a cop. I think RWBY is copaganda because Team RWBY specifically were badge carrying officers with authority over people, the position of hunters is something we've seen plagued by corruption, and there are clear problems with the systems of power in the rwby world, and the only moral stance the writers seem to be interested in taking in regards to the role of badge carrying law enforcement officers in their show is 'they should be able to do whatever they want with no consequences' and 'this one specific guy was a bad guy.'
And before this comes up, yes in the show Team RWBY are meant to be seen as good people (Ruby is the only one I'm currently convinced is that good of a person, but that's a topic for another post,) and the show "proved them right" about not wanting to be managed by having Ironwood turn into a completely crazy and maniacally evil villain, and they'll probably be heroes while being hunters still. But that's part of propaganda. It's like the cops in Brooklyn 99, no one is saying Jake Peralta is a bad person who does terrible things, we're saying that framing fictional cops as good people who do the right thing is propaganda. It's a problem that Weiss was written to be a badge carrying law enforcement officer who wants the authority to arrest people without any accountability, not because I think Weiss is going to misuse that authority, but because I think the show is suggesting that the problem is bad apple cops but if a good person is in the role, then it's fine.
Just like how Weiss wanted to be a GOOD billionaire CEO and her grandfather billionaire CEO was a hero, and Jacques is treated like just a bad apple. It feels like the show is fundamentally disinterested in unpacking anything from a systemic standpoint and wrote a show where the systems aren't worth thinking about and the only problem is a few bad apples, and when you frame badge carrying law enforcement officers that way, that's copaganda.
Also I'm only saying this because I've had problems with this in the past, please don't screenshot any part of this post or any of my other posts and post it separately or send it around to anyone. Whenever that happens, I get a string of hate anons. XD

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm thinking about making more rwby posts again, trying to get my thoughts together and get the gumption to make a wishlist, predictions, and worst case scenario list in light of V10 being made right now. But I'll tell you, it is so funny having been gone for months and knowing there aren't many active rwde blogs left, seeing very few new posts whenever I do scroll through the rwde tag... And STILL seeing people complaining about being forced to see criticism and saying that there's just a lot of hateful people filling the poor rwby tag with their rwde takes.
Like
You know how in movies and shows people will be like "You and what army?" And then the person they're challenging suddenly has like a ton of people with them? This is like the reverse of that, someone says they're afraid of an army and then it's like two people casually posting the occasional bi-weekly roast of Jaune or deep dive into their fix-it.
Every time I see this kind of thing, I feel like I'm being driven up the wall. It was bad enough when there were like thirty to forty rwde posters posting semi-regularly and we were being told we were over-running the Fandom and ruining the show for everybody else, but who are these people even talking about now? There's like nobody there!
Ranking my complaints about the Umbrella Academy from least important (the bad guys with guns have stormtrooper aim) to most important (the last season ruined everything.)