And they'll take away women's sports...
Jess Piper at The View From Rural Missouri:
The funny thing about the Heritage Foundation is that they have always been upfront about their plans. They write hundreds of pages of plans for the dystopian future they envision, and they donât hide the plans. They publish them online for the world to seeâŚremember Project 2025?
Analyses by the Center for Progressive Reform, an organization tracking the progress of Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation indicate that about 53 percent of the domestic administrative policy recommendations outlined in Project 2025 have been initiated or completed. The Project is a far-right governing blueprint, and the Heritage Foundation has never been shy about its agenda. Project 2025 told us what they wanted to do to government, and a new report published by the Heritage Foundation tells us what they think about women. We are not partners in public life, but people to be managed and separated and minimized. I happened across a sentence in the new Heritage report entitled, âTitle IXâs Failed Experiment: Why Accommodating Sex Differences Beats Engineered Parity.â The Report was released by the Heritage Foundation on July 8, 2026. That sentence shook me. I couldnât believe I read it in a report from an organization that is actively working inside the Trump regime. Trump appointed several contributors and authors tied to Project 2025 and the Foundation, such as Russell Vought (Office of Management and Budget), Tom Homan (border policy), and Brendan Carr (FCC). The Heritage Foundation is now fully embedded in the Trump regime.
I went on to read the entire report on Title IX, and I could barely contain my anger and outrage. The plan is to end, or severely limit, womenâs competitive sports and return to sex-segregated opportunities for men and women in schools across the country. To assert that women never needed sports in the first place. To prove that Title IX has become a tool of âfeminist social engineering.â To demonstrate that women donât need competitive sports and that âclubs, intramurals, and exercise classesâŚâ would suffice. To instead encourage âactivities that emphasize rhythm, coordination, community, and graceful exertion.â To prove that women donât need to compete at elite levels, but rather benefit from activities that build, âhealth, good habits, vigor, grace, confidence, and beauty.â The report outlines that the goal for womenâs sports should be, ââŚvirtue and health grounded in reality and freedom, not the imposition of a male-oriented competitive ideal.â
[...]
So, I did a little digging into the man who wrote the report: Scott Yenor, PhD. He is the acting Chair of the American Citizenship Initiative and a Research Fellow at The Heritage Foundation. The page dedicated to him on the Heritage Foundationâs site has praise for his work, saying: âYenor is a student of the hostile forces of feminism and liberals that rip the family apart or prevent families from forming.â
[...]
The âweaponizationâ Yenor is referring to is the inclusion of women and girls in school sports. Sounds like the old and tired DEI arguments from the Right. Giving equal opportunity to women and people of color is somehow diminishing the opportunities of others. We can clearly see where anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion have landed us since they have been dismantled by the Trump regime. Our country is not better without DEI â we could argue that it is worse. The irony in all of this is not lost on me. The Heritage Foundation has consistently fought to âsaveâ girlsâ sports and has taken a stand against trans athletes in sports. They argue that âmale genetics and physiology provide inherent competitive and safety advantages that undermine fairness for female athletes under Title IXâ all the while the true intention was to dismantle womenâs sports.
The âmen in womenâs sportsâ rhetoric was just anti-trans rhetoric. The anti-trans sports fight was always a vehicle for a broader rollback of womenâs sports protections. The Heritage Foundation was never committed to an effort to save or better womenâs sports. They used their anti-woman, anti-trans, anti-inclusion talking points to try to attain their true goal: the elimination of competitive sports for women. To keep women segregated from men starting in school sports.
Great column by Jess Piper calling out The Heritage Foundationâs recent pivot to attacks on womenâs sports that all started by attacking trans sports inclusion.










