barnyard the original party animals is the uncontested lord of bad implications in childrens movies
ok so like âthe secret life of xâ movies tend to not strongly explore the actual reasons why, exactly, their life has to be secret⌠they donât really focus on it within the narrative. They do usually have some small justification for why animals or video games or toys or whatever have never just revealed themselves:
Thereâs no stated reason. They just pretend to not be alive. We usually can suspend our suspension of disbelief here because when itâs something like a video game or an emoji because any odd occurrences is perceived as a glitch or something similar but the actual reason why they arenât too hung up on this kinda shitty lot in life isnât said
They get something out of their current relationship with humans (like in toy story)
They have some specific reason to hide that theyâre alive, like they die if theyâre seen (like in the christmas toy)
They perceive themselves as sentient, talking creatures, but humans canât understand them. They just see a squeaking mouse or an inanimate hot dog or whatever.Â
and the last one is what most animal movies do, and itâs like, not devoid of weird implications but you can see where it mostly works.
but barnyard is the outlier here: it goes with tier one: the animals can talk and walk on two legs but just pretend that they canât for unstated reasons.Â
in the history of the barnyard world non human animals, at some point, decided to just pretend to be unable to speak. a âcowâ or a âcoyoteâ or a âhenâ do not exist as we know it in the barnyard universe. the baa of the sheep is false; the ewe doesnât understand it either. they only made up that noise to hide the fact that they speak human languages. a dog barking and running on all fours is a facade. animals naturally walk on their hind legs and made up whole postures just to appear non sentient.
and for what? what do they gain from this? they have no rights and no voice by their own choice. at one point a donkey claims the farmer is a good person because heâs vegan and a pig mentions bacon - this is not a fantasy universe devoid of death and misery and meat. do animals, in hushed whispers, remind their children not to sob in their real voice as theyâre taken away? do the dogs not beg for kindness when theyâre tied up and hit? do cows and chickens not cry for their life in the slaughterhouses? does a rat not scream a human scream when the trap misses their neck and only breaks their spine? Why? what is the point? They loose so much and have everything to gain.
anyways does everyone remember this really awful cat. it only appears in one scene but i can just sense the porn of it that would pop up if i googled itâs name
Actually the TV series Back at the Barnyard interestingly implies it may be a sort of religious tradition for animals to pretend to be non-sapient around humans, possibly a religion created by humans themselves, which eventually just became a cultural tradition in general once it became clear humanity no longer expected animals to talk and walk upright anymore.
With Otis briefly being indoctrinated into a Buddhist cult of cows who revere a âSun Cowâ, which is revealed to be a cow with qualifications to become Kobe beef. As part of their traditions, the designated âSun Cowâ is heavily pampered, before being slaughtered and served for a Japanese restaurant. This is treated as a great honor amongst them.
This nearly happens to Otis before he is rescued, though the cow cult lets him go without much fuss. Presumably they continue sacrificing their own to become high quality Japanese meals afterwards, but respect Otisâ decision not to go through with it.
Very interestingly, farm animals are not only aware humans eat them, but also seem to support it to varying degrees, or otherwise are surprisingly neutral. Even as Otis resists the idea of being eaten, heâs not exactly lifting a hoof to stop the practice in general. Itâs just that ingrained into their society as a fact of life, in spite of the morbidity of it. Otis and his friends are seemingly the only ones who donât want to be eaten, and are treated as being âimmatureâ for not wanting to go through with this sort of cultural obligation to be consumed, which relates overall to the themes of the movie, Otis not willing to accept the responsibilities his father and other animals in the Barnyard expect from him.
Being eaten appears to be a warped right of passage for animals in the Barnyard universe after a certain point and in other barnyards, which is a very dark-yet-fascinatingly realistic approach to a secretive 'talking animal societyâ that coexists with humans, but that doesnât mean they arenât aware that this is fatal, though many adopt an eerily blasĂŠ attitude towards their own mortality, or otherwise express only mild concern, with Otis usually seeming the only exception at times, hence why other animals outside of the main Barnyard cast, as well as the older animals within it, regard Otis and his associates as being 'spoiledâ for their lack of obligation to allowing themselves to be killed and eaten.

























