实名上网

does anyone else think it's really scary when china interacts with other countries. like, i dunno, i just get bad vibes from her. she's probably doing inappropriate stuff when we aren't looking. what a creep.

it's important to be critical of both the USA and China. i don't have anything specific to criticize China for because then you would point out how i'm wrong, so instead i will appeal to the nuance of how you should not be uncritical of anyone in general. there's lots of accusations out there and I'm not taking an official stance on anything because it's all so complicated but you gotta be cautious. i am critical of US propaganda but those perfidious orientals must be up to something. i don't have any evidence but china has bad vibes better block and be safe. i am tacitly supporting US anti-china propaganda but if i call it nuance you can't say i'm doing that without sounding unreasonable

Yankees can't imagine a world without the United States of America. That's why they think a future where the USA has collapsed as a world where civilization itself has collapsed. They find it easier to imagine abandoned bombed-out cities and Mad Max highway gangs than transitional governments brokering international trade agreements.

most of us understand that the freedom of the press in a capitalist country means the freedom for capitalists to hire armies of journalists and editors to publish content whose ideological outlook is compatible with maintaining capitalism. we're so used to seeing it that it can be difficult to see what isn't being printed. there's a vast amount of labour disputes over hours, pay, and workplace safety that rarely get covered. we rarely see stories about which injuries and illnesses are common in particular trades and what might be done about it. the few union disputes that do get reported are so notable because the reporting is so rare. class struggle is erased from popular consciousness by being erased from the news. this is why we in the communist movement need our own news media

reading academic papers will have you saying shit like deleterious

For me the word that entered my normal lexicon from reading papers is spurious

fuck off yankee colonizer. stop spouting bullshit when you have never even lived there. i’m actually from hong kong and life there is far from “authoritarian fire”. we don’t need you yankees starting color revolutions and trying to turn asia into another neocolony.

When it comes to Hong Kong, "pro-democracy" is like "pro-life": a nickname used to whitewash one's actual position and poison the well. The "pro-democracy" camp in Hong Kong is the pro-Western anti-communist camp. They are fighting for capitalism and imperialism, not for democracy.

I appreciate this is probably right, but may I have some actual sources for the information?

considering we have personally literally seen the old colonial flag and the American flag flown during the protests it’s uhhh not looking great. also while we would say most supporters at the time weren’t literally calling for the re-establishment of the british empire, the vast majority are US loving liberals which is basically the same thing lol (source: just ask my family lmao ).

Usamericans "care a lot about what happens outside the US" when they're shepherded by corporate media, hence their vociferous support for al-Qaeda in Syria, the neonazi coup regime in Kiev, or NATO-backed religious extremists in Libya, but they certainly don't care enough to listen to a single thing any non-white, non-westerner has to say about global geopol