change does not come from a place of comfort
occasionally subtle
RMH

d e v o n
Phantogram Three
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Product Placement
The Bowery Presents
Fieri Frames
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
The Stonewall Inn
Interview Vampire Daily
taylor price
Claire Keane

PR's Tumblrdome

Discoholic 🪩
todays bird
cherry valley forever
🪼
seen from Indonesia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Canada

seen from Spain

seen from T1

seen from Venezuela

seen from China
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Mexico
@jimmythejiver
change does not come from a place of comfort

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the unimaginable power of saying "huh, guess that's not for me" and moving on with your life
it's just. I don't think I've ever experienced this much misogyny as a "cis woman" than as a trans man who doesn't want to sit down and shut up. I feel like I'm going crazy. and I grew up in the south! I'm no stranger to experiencing it the literal moment I was born, but from fellow progressives and sometimes even other trans people is driving me crazy!
if I still identified as a woman, most half-decent people would at least hesitate a moment before calling me whiny, hysterical, bitchy, probably on my period, incapable of deeper thought, lying about being sexually assaulted, only good for cooking, cleaning and spreading my legs. but now that I'm a man it's like the gloves are off. they're GIDDY with excitement to see who can call me a cunt the fastest. it's "fair game" to hit me now, because now the target looks different, looks like he needs humbling, and so they have a free pass to commit a social taboo.
I'm firmly of the opinion we all have internalized misogyny to unpack at some point, every single one of us as we all live in a deeply patriarchal world, but it just breaks my heart to note that so many see themselves as generally progressive and thus think they've already done the work.
I need other trans people to take it seriously when nonbinary people are misgendered
I got a new phone that has amazing pen control. So, of course, I had to doodle something that shows off exactly none of that. 😂

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Emily Simmons - Curiosity at the Fountain, 2026 - Aquarelle, watercolour on canvas
Tumblr is super big on the "I didn't say it was good, I said I liked it" but really need to discover the value in its opposite of "I didn't say it was bad, I said I hated it".
You can acknowledge that something is good, great, a masterpiece even, and just straight-up not enjoy it.
I wish the hate George Lucas and every actor on those mid Star Wars projects had thrown at them would be redirected at J.K. Rowling and all the adults making money off her fascist I.P.
if i were a respected british actor with any principles at all i would simply not agree to a project whose earnings will have material consequences for trans people but maybe i'm built differently
another one bites the dust
List of other people who also suck for this reason:
Bill Nighy
Hugh Laurie
James McAvoy
John Lithgow
Katherine Parkinson
Keira Knightley
Kit Harrington
Leo Woodall
Mackenzie Crook
Mathew MacFadyen
Matt Berry
Nick Frost
Paul Whitehouse
Peter Serafinowicz
Riz Ahmed
Shirley Bassey
Simon Armitage
Simon Pegg
Stephen Fry
Stephen Mangan
Warwick Davis
Black Mirror director Ally Pankiw rejected an opportunity to work on HBO's Harry Potter series because of J.K. Rowling's views on gender.
"It simply is this easy to say no to funding transphobia"
did you have to use that photo for that
i mean good on them...? still paired with that image thats uh. interesting
I respect the fuck out of this. The whole site is trying its hardest to go against every selling point the dog robots have as its selling points.
The dog robots are supposed to be autonomous, threehalves is explicitly only for being piloted by a human. The giant horns make it difficult for this machine to enter through doorways, and that is the point. Coupled with the built-in weak points, it is very easy to disable this thing, so it can't be used by the police or the military effectively.
OP alluded to how unsettling the machine looks, and I believe that it was a concious decision; the robot dogs have garnered sympathy due to their apperance, which makes it easier for the police to morally justify their use. This thing? You're not gonna get many people to sympathise with it. The only people who would are monster and-or robot fuckers, and I believe these circles generally understand that a machine cannot be trusted (though of course many would willingly approach it for pervert reasons (positive) knowing full well it's a bad idea).
If @horsefigureoftheday and @wouldyoufuckthistaur haven't seen this yet then I'm fixing that right now.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
One of my biggest literary pet peeves is when historical or history-inspired fiction pretends that "courting" is a synonym for "dating". Usually it's just a one-to-one word swap--in a modern context, these characters would be dating, but this is olden times, so they call it courting instead. Sometimes they'll pretend there's a shade of difference, and that courting is a more serious exploration of marriage or something. But I read a lot of fiction that was actually written during these historical eras, and the word "courting" is never used like that.
Two people do not decide that they are "courting". One person decides to "court" someone else. It's an action, not a stage in the relationship. A man decides to court a woman because he wants to encourage her to have romantic interest in him. He's trying to win her favor. It's not an exclusive relationship--a woman could be courted by multiple men at once. She'll spend time getting to know the guy who's interested in her, but they won't officially define their relationship as one where they only show romantic interest in each other. If they reach a point where they want it to be exclusive, that's when you propose.
There's no middle ground--either you're getting to know each other, or you're committed to marrying each other. This idea of a period where you kind of commit to each other until you decide you definitely want to get married is a modern one, and it occurs in eras where they use the word "dating" to describe it. The closest equivalent I can think of are times and places where they'd talk about a couple "stepping out together", but they're still not calling it "courting". Words have meaning, and the word "courting" has never meant that, so stop using it that way!
the other mild historical disjoint i run into is when people talk about dating in the fifties like it automatically meant exclusivity. the whole reason we have the expression "going steady" is because the default was to or "go around with" or "go out with" multiple people. not in the sense of being in a stable polyamorous vee, but in the sense that archie is actively "seeing" both betty and veronica during the entire time the two girls are competing for his attention and they're both seeing other guys to make him jealous, and nobody involved considers this "cheating."
bizarrely, America has in many ways gotten more conservative about dating since World War II.
bizarrely, America has in many ways gotten more conservative about dating since World War II.
Some of that was the rise of the Moral Majority in the late 1970s, but it was really in the 1980s, when heterosexuals realized that they could get AIDS, too, that the open attitude toward sex that was so common in the 1970s slammed shut. That's when the idea that sexual activity was "dirty" -- as in, literally disease-ridden -- broke out of the religious right and returned to the cultural mainstream.
And yes, there's a difference between dating and sex, but it didn't take long for "dating more than one person" to be considered a sign of implied promiscuity and moral laxity.
As I said at the time: "The Sexual Revolution is over, and we lost."
my most ungrounded and unresearched fear is that so many companies are pushing AI in part because it builds them a pathway towards a subscription model for a huge number of things that should not be subscription, but theoretically could be:
do you want to talk to verizon's help desk because there's an error on your bill? to access a real agent, you have to pay for Verizon Access+, only 5.99 a month.
want to filter out all the fake job postings from the real ones? subscribe to Indeed: Advanced Tactics and only verified postings will appear on your dash.
sick of the infinite ai slop? buy Google Premium; it'll automatically detect ai within a site and gives it a credibility score. with premium plus, you can shuffle high-credibility results to the top.
do you want a "luxury" experience? well, you'd have to pay for that luxury, and since the company sure doesn't want to pay its employees; the cost would fall to the consumer.
when automation has made every experience unpleasant; the experience of genuine humanity will be commodified.
This is already happening – one of the softwares used by a museum I work at only lets you talk to a human help agent if you have their premium subscription. It's such bullshit
the fact you are not the only one in these notes saying "no this is already happening; i have to pay money to speak to a representative" is just... really awesome! you said a software used by museums is doing this shit? okay! great! wonderful!! anybody know where i can scream
genuinely I'm so sick of people wanting all fiction to be ethical. can we all just get a little gross with it. the point of fiction is that it's not real. we can be unethical in fiction; same goes with being perverted with fiction, being unrealistic with fiction, and being grotesque with fiction. not all fiction has to be ethical, not every character has to be ethical, and that's okay. can we stop with the puritanism. be gross. be unrealistic. be whatever. if I don't like it it's not my business as long as we're all clear that its fictional.
via ered.bsky.social, the only kinds of unethical fiction:
people in the replies are going "what about books glorifying unethical things" and "what if it's propaganda" and you, my friends, are who this comic was made for
The pathologization of anger needs to be talked about. What do you mean my therapist is telling me that there’s something “chemically wrong” with me because I am still angry about my mom DYING OF COVID.
of course I’m still angry? My mom and 1.3 million other Americans are dead and you want me to shoot sunshine out of my ass about it?
“But It’s been 3 years since she died, you have complex grief” yeah and she was on a ventilator for 11 days and she kept writing “I am scared” and “I don’t want to die” on a notepad over and over again. While you were still going out unmasked and unvaccinated and coughing all over each other, I was living a nightmare I couldn’t fucking wake up from. And every single day I’m reminded of it in the form of “haha wasn’t the pandemic such a wacky time haha” and “I’m not getting a booster you can’t make me 🤪 (nobody asked)” and “it’s not real they made the numbers up!!!”
“You’re not coping” Ok here’s the deal; I’ll stop feeling this anger when we have a national memorial (we don’t) or a cdc equipped to stop it from happening again (we don’t) or a population that takes a deadly disease seriously BEFORE it effects them personally (WE DON’T!)
until then, I’m pretty sure my anger is A COMPLETELY NORMAL HUMAN REACTION given the facts at hand
Idioms of the World, Matt Lindley

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Annie Dillard
[ Image ID: A text quote
"One of the few things I know about writing is this: spend it all, shoot it, play it, lose it, all, right away, every time. Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book, or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now. The impulse to save something good for a better place later is the signal to spend it now. Something more will arise for later, something better. These things fill from behind, from beneath, like well water. Similarly, the impulse to keep to yourself what you have learned is not only shameful, it is destructive. Anything you do not give freely and abundantly becomes lost to you. You open your safe and find ashes."
End ID. ]
I love when people try to gotcha me on my stance that all sports should be gender integrated with "even American football???" because I can instantly come back with "oh lmao, no, I don't think ANYONE should play American football at all, it's way too dangerous" like nice try but I know no amount of testosterone is going to protect you from the profound, life ruining health issues caused by getting repeated severe concussions over the course of several years. No one should play this sport.