jiminy-cricket12

"They forget to mention Johnny depp wants to take $50million away from a baby, Ambers baby. He says it’s “not for money.” Well that’s true, it’s for pure evil."

are they this dumb on purpose??? 😂😂😂

someone answered

"🤦🏻‍♀️ Johnny filed the lawsuit before the baby even existed. Amber brought that baby into this world in the midst of a lawsuit & while she’s claiming she has PTSD that affects her daily life. What would be pure evil is if a person had a baby to gain sympathy or to sway a jury"

which is facts, amber was whining she doesn't have money because jd sued her, but in the middle of lawsuit she decided to start hella expensive process of surogate pregnancy. she wanted baby pity points, but was too vain to go through body changing process of being pregnant herself. she decided to rather throw money on surogate instead of giving money to children's hospital as she "pledged". roxie hart 2.0

It’s being reported that the lawyers are back in court today. That is complete moot, until Judge Azcarate says a verdict has came in.

Excuse me while I cry into my pillow

I've seen a lot of Mini Leia criticism, some people say that a 10 years old little girl would never act like her, and I'm wondering

1) Why do people think that a 10yo child can't be smart or mature? and

Super random return to Tumblr after what I think must be years! But having fallen down the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard rabbit hole, I’m seeing some Amber apologists on here posting the ultra gaslighting bits of Rottenborn’s closing without allowing comments, so I just felt compelled to come on and make my own comment to say: 

“If you didn’t take pictures, it didn’t happen. If you did take pictures, they’re fake. If you didn’t tell your friends, you weren’t injured. If you did tell your friends, they were part of the hoax.“ 

That is Not. TF. what we (or Camille) are saying. And it was unbelievably insulting and gross for him to frame it that way.

The reason what Amber’s done makes me so angry is because I DON’T assume anyone would lie about having suffered abuse, ever. I have argued vehemently against misogynists who DO treat women who come forward as lying until proven otherwise. So no, sir, I do not appreciate being lectured about how I’m harming women when it took the absolute mountain of evidence of her NOT being truthful to pull me away from that default. I don’t appreciate being gaslit for being upset that someone would take advantage of that default that the 99% of survivors who would never dream of lying about the abuse they’ve suffered fought, and continue to fight, so hard for. 

This is not about “if it happened you should have pictures.” This is about there being a mountain of photos, videos, and recordings proving that the incredibly severe, specific allegations she sat there recounting in gruesome detail under oath never happened. 

This is about her sitting there swearing up and down under oath that the video we all saw with our own two eyes of her completely uninjured, was her with two black eyes and a busted lip after having been brutally beaten in the face by a man who wears the equivalent of brass knuckles in rings. Not “the abuse wasn’t the type you would see in this video” - but specifically “yes, I had severe facial injuries in this video where my face looks flawless.” This is about her having carefully documented all manner of OTHER photos and videos exploiting Johnny’s struggles with addiction, and insisting that the harm he did to himself is somehow evidence of him having brutally, severely harmed her, while deliberately having avoided taken photos of herself after the alleged most severe attacks. 

No one. is saying. that the abuse has to be severe in order for it to count. No one is expecting survivors to have documented everything. SHE made the allegations so severe that they don’t match up with the reality we see. SHE made it impossible to believe she wasn’t sitting there this whole time appropriating the very real suffering others have had to go through. 

So to the survivors out there (especially women, for purposes of this discussion): 

I can’t control what others do, but please know that I believe you, and will NEVER expect any bar of proof to do so. It took a heaping mountain of proof I could see and hear with my own eyes and ears that Amber IS lying - Amber, one single woman out of the 99% who would never dream of doing so - to make me not believe her. And her lies will never make waver in standing by you. I will always believe women, and I’ll continue to call out anyone using this trial as an excuse to do otherwise. 

I just don’t believe Amber. One specific privileged cis white woman who coopted a necessary, hard-fought feminist movement as a shield for her abusive behavior.