Switzerland considers steps to allow weapons re-exports to Ukraine
The motion that would allow for the re-export of weapons to conflict zones under certain conditions was adopted with 14 to 11 votes on Tuesday (24 January) in the committee for security policy of the National Council – one of the chambers of the Swiss parliament.
The text adopted in the committee on Tuesday now wants to make it possible for the Swiss government to revoke non-re-export clauses in agreements with third countries if the weapons in question are to be shipped to a conflict which has been condemned as violating international law by a two-thirds majority of the UN General Assembly.
In the case of Russia’s war in Ukraine, the UN General Assembly has already decided accordingly.
In its current form, Switzerland’s War Material Law states that countries that buy weapons or ammunition in Switzerland must sign a non-re-export declaration, which means they need Swiss approval if they want to deliver to Ukraine.
Only recently the law was reinforced, making it even harder for the Swiss government to allow the re-export of arms in regions of military conflict.
Traditionally neutral Switzerland has faced criticism from several European countries, including Germany and Spain, over blocking shipments of Swiss-made ammunition to Ukraine.
Germany wants to supply Ukraine with ammunition for Gepard anti-aircraft tanks, Denmark wants to deliver Swiss-made Piranha tanks and Spain wants to do the same with Swiss-made anti-aircraft guns.
However, Bern so far has dismissed those asks on the basis of arguing they would breach the country’s neutral stance.
The shift in the committee for security policy became possible after the Social Democrats gave up their opposition inside the body.
According to the committee, the decision would not contradict neutrality because Switzerland would not explicitly allow the shipment of arms to conflict zones, but it would merely target the non-re-export clauses in the purchase contracts.
This interpretation is controversial, however. For example, the former Swiss ambassador to Germany Thomas Borer said that the proposal would indeed violate neutrality law.
The committee, meanwhile, explained its decision with security considerations.
“The majority of the committee believes that Switzerland must make its contribution to European security, which means providing greater aid to Ukraine,” the majority of the committee members said in their statement.
Their motion explicitly relates to the war in Ukraine, limiting its validity until the end of 2025.
For the change to come into effect, however, both chambers of the Swiss Parliament have yet to agree.
Moreover, depending on the legislative form of the change of the rules, the move could even be subject to a referendum if enough signatures can be found to oppose it.