Doesn't this person do this constantly?

(Guessing this ask is in reply to this post I just made: [link])

So. I don't think I mentioned the trans men, boys, and transmasculine people in this post being misogynistic. You made that up. Probably because you are a transphobe who thinks that when certain people transition, they're automatically misogynistic. And so, you telling me to "be better" makes it clear that you want me to detransition in order to not be misogynistic. And I'd rather die than detransition. So yeah.

This "emasculation" is dysphoria-causing. I can't tell if you're a regular terf or a trf because of this. Cause like, a LOT of different kinds of transandrophobes like causing dysphoria in trans men, boys, and transmasculine people. You either know how dysphoria feels and are looking to inflict it on people you deem lesser, or you don't know how dysphoria feels and therefore don't gaf where you spread it.

Then when bisexuals spoke up and were like "hey we actually do experience homophobia because we are often perceived as queer. Also I'm really uncomfortable with how I'm being treated in my own community" but I responded by spouting statistics about corrective rape and violence against lesbians (despite the fact they never denied the suffering of lesbians), while ignoring their actual objection, we could agree that would be a horrible and biphobic thing to do?

Like for example if there was a “lesbophobia affected/exempt” binary then gay men would be excluded from that and while both are marginalised for the same reason this basically turns into “lesbians have it worse for being attracted to women gay men never face real issues because misandry isnt real” instead of “lesbians and gay men face unique challenges as well as similar ones, and we should listen and respect each other while fighting the patriarchy meant to keep all of us down)

Then in comes bisexuality (+pan/omni etc.) which breaks this binary entirely. What makes a bisexual lesbophobia exempt or affected? Are all of them exempt? Affected? Then comes in the constant binarisation (just like intersex and non-binary people deal with) to try and fit these moulds. Are you boy bisexual or girl bisexual?

The point is it’s all stupid and a gay man could be subject to lesbophobia/a lesbian can be subject to homophobia usually directed at gay men

Also seeing how homophobia is used for both homosexuality amongst women and men, but women have the more specific lesbophobia term while the use of homoandrophobia to distinguish it from lesbophobia would be seen badly, I feel that could parallel the discussion over transphobia, with transmisogyny being used to be specific about trans women's oppression but trans men being told that their experiences are just transphobia.

I also think the whole example gets complicated just like the original discussion the moment trans people are taken into account. Can you transition away from lesbophobia/homophobia? If a trans person used to be a gay man and now isnt a man anymore, are they exempt from homophobia? If a trans person is seen by others as a cis queer person, are they affected or exempt based on their internal identity? If a straight butch woman gets mistaken as a man, are they homophobia affected or exempt? If a straight femme man gets mistaken as a woman, are they lesbophobia affected or exempt? Would butchxbutch and femmexfemme be more oppressed than butchxfemme because a butchfemme couple might be mistaken for a straight one?

Context: OP (it/she) made a post claiming that the people who believe in the existence of transandrophobia as a concept would be upset at a study because it included 10% fewer trans men than trans women. She then went on to assign all nonbinary people (including those intersex people who identify as nonbinary) to be either transfem or transmasc, based on their reported agab in the study, so it can go "See! In reality there's a few percent more transmascs than transfems in this study!".

When I pointed out that, hey, it's pretty disrespectful to categorise ALL nonbinary people as either transfem or transmasc (since many aren't either of these and it's just another binary), especially based solely on their agab, it went "Fine, then I'll change it to TMA/TME instead. Happy?"

I received the above reply when pointing out that, no, you're still categorising nonbinary people (and now explicitly all intersex people too) based solely on their agab. Something which many people in both of these groups explicitly wish not to have done to them.

But hey, TMA/TME isn't trying to ask about people's agab, right? Quick, tell me which genitals your doctor thought you have/had/should have, so I can declare you categorically exempt from a type of discrimination and assign you a box! Let me put you into one of two gender boxes now. You're anti-feminist if you don't let me put you into a box.

"I got no problem, if you're a boy, girl, or tranny, you do you"

Like yeah, that's not nice to say, but he at least doesn't care about trans people?

Same here. Yeah, he may be still going off the "man = male = penis and testes, woman = female = ovaries and uterus" that is "Basic Biology" even though that's not quite fully accurate to either biology or gender, but at least he's not *maliciously* transphobic, and he's dunking on a Trump supporter, and isn't into Alpha Male BS? So people are just willing to overlook it and shrug it off as "cis stupidity" because he's on the right side for the most part.

I think that's why people are willing to overlook the erasure. He's not exactly being intentionally malicious, he's just being a typical cis person.